You should be able to solve this.
You should be able to solve this
2
420
2, I've seen it before on mindyourdecisions. there is a little cabiat about when the function converges but I think 2 is correct.
42
I should be able to do so many things...
>Moozzi2
Off yourself
4
Looks like gibberish to me
>2^2^2^.... = 2
but it the limit is in the infinite so the number is not real I guess
he meant that ?=2, not x
Thanks.
200iq
But what is x specifically?
square root of 2, so 1 something
>What number to the power of 2 is 2
x^x^x^... = 2
logx(x^x^x^...) = logx(2)
x^x^x^... = log_x(2)
2 = logx(2)
x^2 = 2
x=square root of 2
only works in real numbers, not imaginary, minus square root of (2) is not the solution
it only proves that if the number was real, it would be the root of 2 but it did not prove it exists
just replace 2 with limit that would approach 2 in infinity and it checks out I guess
Remind me trig
I can't even tell what the top part is supposed to mean.
X is infinitely squared by itself? Is that even a thing?
Did you not learn about that in high school?
I don't think has finished high school.
Tetration
Thanks, we never learned that
I didn't either.
I recommend watching 3blue1brown on YouTube
you got anything on statistics? even better if it's applied to data science
3blue1brown is mainly mathematics and statistics though.
I don't have data science specifically sorry. I only watch gamedev and ML stuff plus other science channels.
>ML
works for me, from what I've seen data science ends up in ML anyway, the statistics basics should be the same
do it faggots
If you change tracks while the trolley is on the crossing then the back of the trolley will go in a different direction from the front. The trolley will go off track and depending on its speed either just fall over or have a catastrophic crash.
>he doesn't know about multi-track drifting
Look at the distance between the trolley's wheels.
These things are not drawn to scale.