Does she regret it?

>haha tanjiros limbs go splurt

Death is a kindness.

I took that as them being assmad Wani was ending it right when it got popular so they didn't give any special privileges

>work for a few years
>earn enough money and reputation to do whatever you want for several lifetimes
My guess is no.

>muzan escapes
>manga continues
the final battle was underwhelming enough to warrant it

> Considering Wani/editor-kun asked for more pages for the final chapter and they declined, idk
Croc sounds like he had a good and better editor than most other authors.

>Surely wsj wouldn't be so retarded is to not allow any breaks at all for what was becoming their biggest hit in ages
That's assuming they want more money than they're already making with One Piece.

no matter how much money a company's making they'll never turn down more of it

Believe it or not, companies aren't always about making as much money as possible.

Public ones are.

Do you think Facebook or Apple is trying to make as much money as possible when they take political stances?

Why would they offer more pages when it could be a selling point for the tank? Far more people bought the series than the magazine.

The company leadership has an obligation to the shareholders to seek profits. So, yes, they lay out political policies with the expectation that it will bring them profits. As it turns out, governments have a big impact on how companies operate, hence all the lobbying.

Are you actually so stupid that you think they aren't profitable as they eclipse the monetary value of continents? It's those that avoid using these services or get kicked off who face financial ruin. Most of the people they ban literally go back and spend their time on there with anonymous accounts like the cattle they are.

>Far more people bought the series than the magazine
But wasn't this because the series blew up in popularity when there were already various volumes avaiable to buy?

Believe it or not, that IS INDEED LITERALLY how wsj runs and it is not fucking news.

Except they're already making profits before taking sides on issues. Do you think they're making the most money they can when they champion trans rights while alienating right-leaning users?

I have no idea what you're talking about, but I assure you the people at the top think whatever policies they're setting will bring in the most money. They don't just quit trying to make more just because they're in the black. Because their pay packages are tied to growth and market comparisons, not purely on whether or not they're able to pay out dividends.

The editor in chief already said he wants to make 3 or 4 'pillars' in wsj that are at one piece level popularity.

Not that he even needed too, idk what you're arguing, of course wsj wants to make more money.

>Do you think they're making the most money they can when they champion trans rights while alienating right-leaning users?

No, but they think they are. All these companies are doing this virtue signaling lately because they have calculated it will make them more money in the long run than they lose.

Also you're forgetting there is a huge difference between WSJ and a company like apple and google. Wsj is a specific branch of a much larger company. Apple and google are so rich they can take huge risks and are basically borderline merged with the government and culture.

How do people at the top of big tech think their policies will bring in the most money when they're potentially alienating a large portion of the population that's anti-LGBT? In case you forgot 70 million voted for Trump.

>retire
>keep making money
>japanese fans happy
Good enough.

No, he/she doesn't