Gentlemen, I have a very important announcement regarding the future of Chainlink...

my body is ready

Attached: 1591910803769.png (900x770, 340.73K)

Do tell chap

Attached: 2183E852-2EBE-4578-8BC8-E1435A7713AB.jpg (1000x1000, 92.46K)

3 stinkers checking in.

Attached: 1597375588321.jpg (618x828, 47.33K)

Attached: 1596942576525.png (1118x618, 113.67K)

Small group tonight. Well now for the reason I gathered you all here tonight.

>What is this exploit?
There's a security layer in LINK's source code that deals with storage ticks. Basically, even in cold storage where they're untouched, there's a cache protocol that will occasionally ping public wallet addresses to verify their contents. Unfortunately, LINK has a slightly different version of this protocol in order to make micro-pings for staking purposes. Most staking rewards are going to be really small transfers, so the LINK devs lowered the tick rate for these pings. However, if you're using a hardware wallet, your storage is operating at the NORMAL tick rate, creating a cache gap where someone can use an SLQ% injection to gain access to your wallet. There's already been many posts of Anons opening up their wallets to find all their tokens transferred out to mysterious addresses, losing tens if not hundreds of thousands of dollars.

>Does this affect other tokens in my hardware wallet?
No, as this isn't a vulnerability with the wallet so much as Chainlink specifically. Other tokens, even on wallets that have been affected by the exploit, are safe.

>I haven't touch my wallet in years! Can someone really randomly gain access and steal my LINK?
Sadly, yes. This affects PUBLIC addresses, and these are most likely being chosen at random.

>I have my LINK on a hardware wallet! What do I do?
Either transfer them to a paper wallet (safest), an exchange, or trade for fiat.

>Can this be patched?
Yes, but it will take time. This isn't something that can be done in one week, as it's tied to the security layers focused on staking. These have to be rewritten very cautiously, else other major functions of the LINK source code can break.

FUCK NIGGERS
FUCK KIKES
FUCK THESE NEWFAGS FLOODING THE BOARD
AND MOST IMPORTANTLY FUCK JANNIES

Attached: 1582510077308.jpg (1148x871, 535.8K)

i was already sitting down.

Attached: 1574664632852.jpg (720x718, 59.15K)

HOLY FUCK ITS REAL

Checked!!! Hackers are never getting my 11 linkies

Checked and verified.

Absolutely based. Fuck niggers fuck kikes fuck janny trannys

Attached: 38900208-AEDF-4860-B557-CD3386ACCE53.gif (498x498, 1.13M)

My links are at Binance, i hope i am safe.

Please don't make us wait all night friend, I'd enjoy some refreshments

Attached: 1582952217200.jpg (250x250, 8.18K)

so is coinbase safe or not?

funds are safu

Attached: 1532415113289.png (512x512, 193.56K)

youtube.com/watch?v=dRYY9HjtZqs

There were multiple threads about how great hardware wallets are and that they're keeping your funds safe right before it happened. It's a (((coincidence))), goyim.

Attached: f7c.png (600x627, 261.28K)

fuck off tranny kike nigger

Can people who make these videos fucking die

MOSSAD INSIDEJOB, i repeat, MOSSAD INSIDEJOB.
youtube.com/watch?v=iWG4BZP4dzM

seconded

Dangerously based thanks for the heads up user. Chainlink team need to pull their heads out of their ass and do something about this!!!!!!! How did the government let this happen!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

fuck you newfags

Attached: 1565236260451.png (929x1175, 119.12K)

We think he's mortal.

Their goal is not the LINK in the wallets but to short LINK.

Attached: 1532045255830.jpg (200x233, 13.31K)

Oh shit an SLQ% injection attack over the cache protocol vector! Fuck me, better call Spock and tell him to recalibrate my hypertension stabilizers and Scotty to beam me up, because that’s some REAL SHIT if ever I heard any!

OMFGOOOOOOOODDDD go fuck yourself you had 3 years