I'm starting to doubt LINK anons.
Long term holder (bought in sub $10) but I am starting to doubt the need for a token. Why can't a major company like GOOGLE copy and paste LINK's code and make their own token? Do you really think they will spend millions of dollars on an oracle?
Other urls found in this thread:
>long term holder
>bought in sub 10
It was sub 10 like a month ago user. That doesn’t prove you’re a long term holder at all. I don’t consider anyone who got in above $4 a long term holder, it consolidated around $3-4 for like a year
>Why can't a major company like GOOGLE copy and paste LINK's code and make their own token?
they can, it's open source so they can do it and not even get sued
it's that easy
literally nothing is stopping them
in developer lingo, it's simply called "a fork"
if you're still holding with this knowledge, you deserve to get rekt
Trust Sergey, he think of these things already. Chainlink is good token, safe pump only.
Facebook tried to do it, but you know what happened?
Take a guess.
>long term holder
>sub 10
Weak bait
>Why cannot x make their own operating system
>Why cannot x just make their own x product
There is a reason why people use Windows, Linux, Microsoft, Apple etc and "don't just make their own" like you propose. Or use some weird and unknown alternative from China.
Chainlink is already becoming a standard.
>long term holder
>bought in sub 10
Dude, you realize some of us have been here since etherdelta days?
i dunno seems pretty effective so far
The code for their operating systems are proprietary and not open source. Anyone could create their own LINK token. If Microsoft created their version of LINK then Chainlink will dump.