SHILLBERT DUMPING

your name is billy and Gil thanks you for your donation

Haha lol. Board says it's a waste of money. And who knows, maybe they're right.

Looking at who's on the board of Quant I would rather listen to them then some salty user chasing gains on exchange listings. I didn't realize it's 2017 again! When rebrand?

We went up quite a bit lately. I'm happy with that. Still sure the marketcap will grow a lot. I can wait a bit.
Half the people in the telegram don't know what Quant is doing, most people in crypto don't see the potential. awareness will come, price will follow imo

this archaic thinking of the Board should make you lose confidence, not gain confidence. By not embracing the crypto revolution they turn themselves into pariahs. Lesser interoperability projects that do embrace the crypto revolution like Polkadot and Cosmos will steal the limelight. They cannot sell tokens and create liquidity if they refuse to use crypto infrastructure. It takes a lot of energy, technology and manpower to securely run a centralized exchange. I was thinking about buying more than 100 quant tokens but I refuse to do so until they get a decent listing!

There is potential and there is squandering potential. Gil can't afford to keep behaving like a spoiled princess in a highly competitive rapidlly advancing revolutionizing industry. If Quant loses out to competitors it's because they didn't go along with the crypto revolution and did not expand appropriately when they had the chance. Then on the other hand I have no clue what's going on in the background. If banks start tweeting about using Quant or something things could explode, it's a blackbox at this point.

IM DUMPING 115K IN 2 HOURS YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED

glad I finally sold part of my bag yesterday at $11.50. salty I didn't sell it all. the opportunity cost of holding this absolute piece of shit is ridiculous

it's funny because your id says "whale", where are you going to dump? on what exchanges?

Why say Gil doesn't support the crypto space? Because he hadn't got on binance?

I M P L E M E N T A T I O N

Attached: photo_2020-08-17_11-51-53.jpg (664x679, 38.59K)

These are fair points, Gilbert does need to think carefully about what he's hoping to achieve.

There's no issue with him selling tokens at any price level (every project does this, routinely - many disguise it more carefully but Gil doesn't care about hiding it, apparently) but he has to play ball with crypto at some point or he'll go nowhere.

I've met the man four times now (no larp) and I believe he's going to pull it out of the bag. A lot of the downside in the last year was not so much due to him but outside actors and community issues.

He is somewhat correct that muhexchanges are a short-term boost; most shit dies when it hits T1 as that was what everything was building up to.

Let's see what happens in September. Those close to the team may reasonably anticipate a repeat of 2018 - who remembers the tears of joy?

People are too crypto oriented here. Think bigger biz.

Who fucking cares if he pulls it out of the bag if it doesn't ever moon

>People are too crypto oriented here. Think bigger biz.

If what Gil says is true - wrt to their clients and wrt token listings etc, it will eclipse anything the mainstream crypto world could have offered, indeed.

So tell me, why does he use an intermediary account when selling his tokens? Genuinely interested

Shillbert here. My years at the treasury have taught me well.

Here at Quant, our corporate background has enabled us to leverage the promise of blockchain & decentralisation whilst offloading my bags whenever I see fit.

First colin & jp questioned my methods. I sent them packing. We are rearchitecting the financial system

whyyy

Let's be honest here, why would any dev use a closed source solution made by a boomer team when Polkadot, Cosmos, etc offer better cross chain interoperability solutions that are actually getting used right now? Quant Overledger is barely a proof of concept and is lagging in the interoperability sector. any lead it previously had is long gone. I'll reconsider my position on Quant when rockstar devs like Andre Cronje use it. As for the real world outside Crypto, Quant's partnerships are dubious to say the least.

>>Board says it's a waste of money

>10x your money overnight
>make it easier for corporations to buy QNT tokens
>waste of money

What sort of fucking retards sit on that board? You think a multinational corporation is really going to buy your bags off idex?

>So tell me, why does he use an intermediary account when selling his tokens? Genuinely interested

For some kind of organisational or record-keeping reason, I imagine? It's obviously not to "hide" anything, since it's still clearly visible, even to barely-viable dimwits such as yourself. In case you didn't know, it's all immediately visible on the blockchain.

Also, consider this:

QNT wallets have increased by 300 this month, mostly in the last few days. Those tokens are now off exchanges and in wallets. In order to maintain a functioning order book, tokens do have to be replenished and the MMs on bittrex are furnished with new tokens (and, indeed, new BTC/ETH - likely arranged by the exchange itself).

That's how these things work.

We know.

This should have never gone past $1. but scammers took it there. Supply meme.

Dump it for Suterusu.

>If what Gil says is true

I don't think he has ever said anything that is true. He is a habitual liar like Craig Wright.

>Quant Overledger is barely a proof of concept and is lagging in the interoperability sector.

Oh I get it, it's funny because the opposite is true and Quant is pretty much the only solution out there with real, working, important clients /right now/.

Good one.