G-guys? What did the EU mean by this? Why are they quoting Chainlink as reference for decentralized voting?
Source: ejece.org
It was published just this month.
Why the fuck am I missing all of this all the time?
Every fucking time it dips I regret not selling and then I find stuff like this and I wonder what kind of idiot sells it instead. Every....Time....
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Exhibit 1
aaaaaa my linkies are gone
dgen gamblers fucking with their lineages future
It’s starting
delete this
Exhibit 2
Just go to the article and CTRL+F Chainlink or Nazarov to find yourself.
Why is every fucking major institution aware of Chainlink and research it? Fucking every. One.
does even matter when its crashing so hard?
thanks for sharing user
Nothing, it was quoted as a reference whaf a smart contract is, not even an oracle, lmao
Holy checked!!
That's literally a nothing burger. It says nothing about chainlink or oracles. It's using slides that sergey uses every single talk he gives as a source. He has mastered the explanation of what a smart contract is and that's his biggest biggest achievement
kek didnt even realize
> went to the article
> ctrl-F'd Chainlink
> found myself
> tfw
>nonce
Do you even know what a nonce it?
en.wikipedia.org
nice find op
CONCEPTUAL USE CASE CONCEPTUAL USE CASE CONCEPTUAL USE CASE CONCEPTUAL USE CASE CONCEPTUAL USE CASE CONCEPTUAL USE CASE CONCEPTUAL USE CASE CONCEPTUAL USE CASE CONCEPTUAL USE CASE CONCEPTUAL USE CASE CONCEPTUAL USE CASE
You niggers really need to learn what the word CONCEPTUAL means, did you even do your research on the KENYAN writer? A literal student.
I know what you are thinking - you think we think this is some sort of integration or partnership.
I know it's not.
It means they are aware of Chainlink.
Can't speak for everyone but at least I am not suspecting it. I'm just glad it's quoted for reach.
So this is kinda the same as what the USPS has recently patented
Who cares? They're aware of bitcoin and ethereum too. Doesn't mean shit.
Interesting. I was reading about blockchain for voting just the other day as with the US elections coming up and the whole USPS shit show happening I was wondering why we haven't yet made moves towards this.
What I found was that the guy the government keeps asking to speak about it (Ronald Rivest) is a major anti-blockchain guy. He started out in early days around 2013 shitting on the use case for blockchain entirely, and especially for voting. More recently he says blockchain has its uses but not for voting.
The thing most curious about this to me is his logic basically implies that with something like LINK blockchain voting will work. For a top expert in the field, he's clearly unaware that LINK exists or about oracles in general.
Problem: We are still relying on dinosaurs with dinosaur ideas to make decisions. I have a feeling he'll live to eat his words, but at the very least when he dies (he's 72, so soon), I bet things will take a very different turn for blockchain voting... or if the EU adopts it first, US will be soon to follow.
US is unironically on the path to 3rd world status. Lacking innovation in government & a depreciating currency. Yikes.
You wouldnt know what a hard crash was if it smacked you across the face with its dick faggot.
You absolute retard, this is a scientific journal. Not the European Union.
holy fuck the desperation of linkies
U seen nothing boy
Imagine being this desparate to prove your coin may actually do something (which it doesn't).
You guys are in a deficit of use cases now for claiming all these partnerships which in reality, don't exist.
U T T E R C O P E
>t. Burger who thinks all scientific journals operate privately like they do in the US
t. Burger
YFLink.
Surprise: Chainlink will be used everywhere
>Some random Journal
>is
>The EU
OP is a retard