ETH is over. What's a better bet, Harmony or Polkadot?

ETH is over. What's a better bet, Harmony or Polkadot?

Attached: 1540244637288.png (1260x869, 919.85K)

Other urls found in this thread:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=j7MeJionPMA
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Harmony

This only makes me more bullish.

Attached: 1594164588937.jpg (542x527, 57.07K)

Polkadot

30% of my portfolio is ETH anyway but holy fuck 2.0 isn't coming any time soon
why tho
Polkadot seems father along but Harmony is backwards compatible with Solidity which means it will be way easier to port all the defi shit over

Attached: 1546726476351.jpg (550x499, 99.89K)

hes a strange dude... and ETH 2.0 is a long ways away...

but i still have hope in the long term

Doesn't really even matter because most layer 1 apps like compound and maker will migrate to layer 2 solutions by end of year (optimistic rollups). dydx will leverage starkware to go L2. Basically by this time next year it won't even matter much if ETH2.0 isn't fully rolled out.

fantom. Nothing else competes

Cardano

Attached: 1583591503268.jpg (976x764, 171.48K)

If this couldn’t kill eth then nothing can.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=j7MeJionPMA

kek you guys I'm being serious

Attached: 1512162999818.jpg (532x681, 129.5K)

ethereum won retard

all fun and games till the next yams drops and you have to pay 40$ in gas fees to swap your shitcoins

No decentralized ethereum competitor can win (even including DPoS here).

Bitcoin didn't lose dominance in adoption because of scaling, it lost because it didn't have full smart contracts - ethereum could do things bitcoin couldn't at all.

Contrary to intuition, scaling is irrelevant as a sole competitive advantage because poorest users are priced out first, and poorest users don't have enough wealth to make other platforms grow. This creates a weird dynamic where lack of scalability impairs growth of crypto as a whole as poor newcomers are turned away one-by-one completely, but wealthier aren't, which prevents the emergence of a more scalable alternative.
It would take something like facebook to dump millions of users at once to change this dynamic, but no current 'ethereum killer' has this capability, as inherently this requires a centralized entity to leverage its userbase, which precludes any decentralized network.
In other words, ethereum is there to stay and no decentralized competitor is ever going to unseat it in terms of adoption (market caps are another thing, xrp pumped above eth once). Ethereum has turing-complete smart contracts so there's no functionality left that ethereum can't do at all.

If you thought that's 'anonymity' that's incorrect - few realize this, but full anonymity is coming to ethereum AND those transfers are going to be cheaper than current eth transfers (including for tokens). Xmr with its tiny userbase (13k daily transactions) is going to get eaten alive.

DUDE WEED LMAO

you are a deluded cultist and I say this as someone who develops solidity contracts for a living

Uhm try again sweetie

Attached: 1597078540971.jpg (1366x768, 343.95K)

>someone who develops solidity contracts for a living
while I have made enough from crypto to live the rest of my life from it. I'm clearly better than you at predicting the future.

Also developing in solidity is nothing special I write in it to bundle more complex actions and the ability to audit code is vitally important given the amount of scams, the money to be made currently from if you know how to avoid them is insane

Doesn't DOT somewhat disrupt your argument though as Ethereum can be run as a parachain on DOT? As I understand it, DOT doesn't have to replace Ethereum as it can just take the parts of ethereum it wants wholesale and then build around it.

Ethereum is like Myspace people only use it because they don't have easy access to the superior ONE

Attached: pajeet.jpg (345x345, 11.33K)

Fantom, unironically

>DOT doesn't have to replace Ethereum as it can just take the parts of ethereum it wants wholesale and then build around it.
Stripped from marketing, polkadot is a very similar model to eth2 phase2, just with a much less decentralized consensus. If you have turing complete vm you can code anything, including another vm. That's also true for current ethereum (eth1), although with poor scalability.
It's just another ethereum killer.

Wtf?
A good post?
On MY biz!?

Bet he played ally, the chad

literal nonsense
>scaling doesn't matter because 100 dollar fees going down the drain on a failed transaction is going to attract rich people
ramblings of a lunatic

That bio is an actual butterfly effect

Doesn't sound like you understood his point at all.

Yeah, but nothing is gonna kill ETH. I think we're seeing the first project that will be a legit competitor though.

As an analogy using websites, all the other layer 1s are telling websites developers that they can come use some new / better alternatives to JavaScript they need to learn and they need to convince their customers to download a new browser. DOT is saying you can keep coding in your preferred language and interact with your current customer base where they're already located.

I'm not saying DOT will definitely succeed, but it is light-years ahead of any other layer 1 competitors.

Yes, I did, and it's retarded. That's simply not the way financial systems work, otherwise banks would charge 20x their fees to try and reel in Bezos. If another platform that actually scales gets any sort of userbase before 2.0 releases it will at the very least steal a huge chunk of the marketcap from ETH, and the chances of that happening are pretty much 1:1