Should I be diversifying? Is everything remotely worth speculating on going to pump again like '17? >t. All in marine since 40 cents
Jaxson Richardson
Always diversify
Brody Jones
Based
Gavin Turner
that's not what i asked, though. and if i did that in 2018 i wouldn't have six figures now...
Wyatt Young
>implying you can "diversify" in crypto when everything is so correlated
Samuel Rodriguez
>that's not what i asked, though. and if i did that in 2018 i wouldn't have six figures now... You asked if you should diversify to which I replied you stupid fuck.
>and if i did that in 2018 i wouldn't have six figures now... You got lucky. There were tons of people who went all in on stuff like Ambrosus etc and lost everything. Never forget this. You got lucky retard
Aaron Morales
sensible user
Jackson Lopez
>Link research autism = Ambrosus's "revolutionary" RFID technology I think I'll stay all in. You've answered my question, in two very different ways. I appreciate that. Let me know when your holoport starts to pay for itself!
It's easy in hindsight user. Well done for getting in Link early, but don't fool yourself one second that a lot of it was luck. Were you here in 2017? Don't you remember how many promising project there were which actually seemed legit and were solving real world problems? Come on mate
James Wilson
ironically, my ambrosus nodes are raking in about a thousand dollars a month now. once 75k node (which is ~$2400 atm) yields around $150 every month after having ramped up. not saying people who bought at the top didn't get JUSTd, but atm the roi is pretty sweet.
Ian Wilson
>BTC is the new Apple >ETH is the new Amazon >XRP is the new Enron >LINK is the new Google FTFY
So you're saying all stonks and crypto is gambling. Fine. But let me ask you - while playing blackjack is it luck when you stay on 20 and win the hand? It is called a smart play. There is very little luck involved in that decision. You don't say "Hurr y'know MATE, in hindsight, that was the easy call!!" unless you're actually clinically retarded.
Jaxson Barnes
I hate retards and niggerfaggots, but I'm still courteous to you.
Jordan Young
>10 years
What's the fucking point?
Lucas Robinson
>The decentralized nature of smart contracts that makes them tamper-proof, also removes their ability to access key contractual performance data, denying them the use of any & all web APIs, as well as precluding them from utilizing important existing outputs like bank payments. This lack of external connectivity is inherent to all smart contract networks, due to the method by which consensus is reached around blockchain transactions, and will therefore be an ongoing problem for all smart contract networks. >This lack of connectivity with external resources creates a large limitation for what a smart contract developer can build today. Without key inputs like data feeds to prove performance, it becomes difficult to build smart contracts which have the functionality we’ve come to expect from a well made web/mobile application. If we examine the way a successful application like Uber is built, we see the application’s core code using a combination of key inputs, and critical outputs. If we tried to build an application like Uber without access to these key building blocks, we’d have to build the inputs/outputs ourselves, in addition to the highly complex application itself. Making all of the building blocks that a good application relies on to come into existence is the work of multiple companies; providing accurate GPS data, interfacing with telecoms for SMS, and providing usable bank to bank payments, are all critical building blocks which were not built by the companies that rely on them to make a working application. The ability for smart contract developers to easily access similarly useful building blocks for their decentralized application, is what we believe would be needed to enable the creation of increasingly more useful smart contracts. >Hey, honey, where are you going? Well... you won't mind if I finish your hotdog then?
Carson Campbell
>Link is the new Tesla Nice FUD
Josiah Morgan
>while playing blackjack is it luck when you stay on 20 and win the hand? Your analogy does not make any sense. If you are at 20 on blackjack there's like 4 cards out of a 52 deck which can make you hit 21. This means that in 92% of cases you are better off not getting another card. Now you are telling me that the same odds were in place for you when you bought LINK? Come on mate