EXIT METAMASK NOW

EXIT METAMASK NOW

Attached: 92847371919485.jpg (1440x1888, 460.23K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=MIyBFNjc1kY
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

can you tell me what this means for a brainlet

Wtf does this mean?

I heard about this days ago. It means literally nothing to us.

LOL ETHEREUM IS FUCKED AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA

HOLY FUCK MOVE YOUR COINS NOW THIS IS SERIOUS

what license are they changing too?

Literally nothing, but they will try to buttfuck forks

Thanks just sold all my linkies

Judenfrei.

oh I see
>Developers can still copy, modify, and distribute versions of MetaMask. Yet for developers that copy, modify, or fork the MetaMask codebase for commercial use, we invite you to start a conversation with us to see how we can find a path forward together. For example, if you’ve copied MetaMask and offer it commercially to an audience larger than 10,000 monthly active users, we would like to enter into a formal commercial agreement.
fucking kikes, I'm deleting this shit from all my devices. Today it's a "commerical agreement", tomorrow it's locking down the code and charging .01eth per transaction or something, fuck that

Attached: 1586785300552.jpg (450x422, 51.32K)

Thanks just excited all positions in crypto and bought some magic the gathering cards as a hedge instead

also if they didn't want people profiting off of their work they could have used a GPL license, not MIT, that's literally what it was invented for. Instead they decide to be kikes

this is good news desu

Wait, they used MIT license, and their shit is all over GitHub for people to fork? LOL ARE THEY FUCKING RETARDED?

WHAT ELSE AM I SUPPOSED TO USE FOR MY SHITCOIN INVESTMENTS FREN
PLEASE HELP

Attached: tenor.gif (406x400, 1.07M)

what are alternatives
i just want to put a couple eth into shitcoins while i wagecuck

mit allows for relicensing it will only apply to new development of course

this most likely wont affect end users in a meaningful way but Zig Forums likes to freak out

This screenshot has no negative implications for MetaMask users. Brainlet thread on the first page of a brainlet board.

my ether wallet or mycrypto, also MEW has a mobile app

you're a brainlet if you don't see the implications of this. They shown they are ready and willing to change their license for profit can and will one day fuck over users, it's not gonna stop here, don't support projects that do this

this is unironically my brothers thinking process

IT MEANS ITS MONKEY SEASON
youtube.com/watch?v=MIyBFNjc1kY
$1000 EOM LETS FUCKING GOOOOOOOO

Attached: 943029071904901742.png (720x720, 486.43K)

no one buys them its just two dudes trading back and fourth between each other to make retards think its a viable investment when they inevitably hear about how a black lotus or whatever sold for 50k or some shit

yes because it was very very very smart to have your precious buttcoins and shidcoins on a fucking web browser KEK

Attached: 1598061687594.gif (128x128, 190.33K)

Please explain this to a smoothbrain.

Attached: 1596716691880.jpg (275x229, 12.64K)

before anybody could use metamask code to make their own metamask. Now if you have 10000 users they are making you pay them

it means they will likely jew their users at some point in the future

What do you mean they can fuck over users. If they implement anything you don’t like just restore your seed phrase in any other wallet cucks. This does nothing to you. Its a company struggling to make money trying to monetize their best product in an unintrusive way

You are a complete fucking moron. This is entirely insignificant.

Here's how this works. If you create software and use any third-party packages(which you do) that use Richard Stallman's stinky toe-eating license, then all of your software must use that license as well.

Someone used a package without checking the license first. Someone found out and told them. They are removing the package.

It's literally nothing.

So you mean a dApp which enables metamask for instance needs to pay metamask to use it's code? Kek capitalism grows again.

yes exactly, if they forked it and are using their code for their project then metamask will make them pay

it wasn't an issue before they switched their license to a jew license. I'm not saying it's immediately bad for users, just that's a bad precedent and not something we should support developers doing. If they wanna get paid throw up a donation link or something. You can't just extort people when it becomes convenient

The MIT License is not a fucking Jew License you fucking AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHSDFHSDUFS IM SURROUNDED BY FUCKING RETARDS

I've like $10 worth of REQ somewhere on some old metamask install should I be worried about my financial wellbeing?