kind of an insider, but not really. I know a few people. I highly recommend you guys check out this video before the upcoming event. Itll be significant breadcrumbs for where the direction of LINK is headed in 2021
Hint: it involves the microsoft plugin
Other urls found in this thread:
Holy fucking shit, this is big.
Oh fuck nice
I’m more excited about their DOT work desu... imagine writing the smart contracts for the Web 3.0
DELET THIS. IM ACCUMALATING
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA MY LINKIEEEEEEES
Wow....so much wow
Wait, is this fucking real? Holy shit
>Implying I would click any 4channel link
This is fake... right? RIGHT??
WTF I CLICKED THIS LINK AND MY METAMASK WAS DRAINED
holy SHIT
How can I create something like this?
kek theres no way that's real
> I know a few people
No you don't you lying neet
I can't hear that shit about smart contracts anymore. This is the biggest meme concerning crypto out there atm.
You really believe clearing can be replaced by a few lines of code? Ffs you would need lawyers and negotiations to create a smart contract working between companies. Why did you think clearing was needed in the first place. For everything complicated, where smart contracts would in theory bring efficiency, they are not simply applied by some programmer. And for the non-complex tasks they can indeed be applied but they are not really needed, any company interface or program handles eg supply chain tracking. That's the big problem out there that is not understood by nerds, as they lack business experience. No company will pay you with inflated pre mined tokens to execute on chain requests concerning issues like delivery tracking. You're simply vastly overestimate applicability.
lmao "nobody will use the internet" etc
Didn't read, didn't click, just bought more
more like dumb contracts, amiritereddit
Your lack of arguments shows me you came to overthink your opinion. That's good retard.
> Huuuurrrrrr I'm a boomer lawyer and nothing ever changes
Cope
You clearly don't understand any of it. There will still be lawyers. Two lawyers. One on each side. They will hash out the details. The details will be set into a smart contract. The smart contract will do the rest. All the other lawyers will be sacked.
>Hurrr i'm a 13 year lacking basic knowledge about business processes. The linkies i bought with my pocket money have value
Aha, so a bipartisan issue is solved by two lawyers in the coming age of smart contracts. How many lawyers do you think are needed today?
16. One to write the contract, one to draft it, one to contest it, and 13 for arbitration
> Hhhuuurrrr processes change faggot
> Hhhuuurrrr my scam coins are worth more than your fiat
Hhhuuurrrr ddduuurrr
I mean i'm no lawyer and desu i don't give a shit if they would lose their jobs, but just think: Contracts are used in business all the time, and still you need legal settlements and negotiations. And you're assuming this will be solved by some lines of well-written code?
Imagine thinking we have to convince you of anything at this point, you stupid cunt. Continue to miss out, remember to be smug about it, and we'll be laughing all the way to the bank.
Smart contracts are disintermediated EXECUTION of terms and when you understand that you'll stop being such an insufferable stupid dipshit.
Look up docusign and open law you mouth breathing nigger
Well that was clear from the beginning. Now think about how they'll be applied for complex issues and tell us. And don't come with shit like temperature tracking and delivery status. No company needs blockchain for that.
That's a perfect example. Pay shall pay third party expenses, not specified what. Typical case: Disputable positions on expense list.
>Smart contract not executable
No company will give a blank cheque that an auto executing mechanism books money on not specifically named "third party expenses"
It's not as easy as you think.