I want to fomo

Explain to me why I shouldn't fomo into RNDR right now

Attached: file (2).png (1031x1132, 269.66K)

Other urls found in this thread:

rendercalculator.com
mobile.twitter.com/JulesUrbach/status/1295831278575448065
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

You don't need to FOMO because you're shilling your bags

I've been buying since 8 cents and I'm still buying. No other token has this type of infrastructure/ usecase with an active market segment. This isn't even on coinbase yet. This is the fuckking one...

Golem already does rendering.

because it's a shitcoin and the market for renting gpus isn't big enough to even discuss

I still have my tether on Hoo exchange waiting for this to dip.

I first found out about this coin at 12 cents, I expected it would go to 8 cents because then I would have a rounded number stack. Now its 24 cents and I am afraid that I am going to get priced out even more and more. I don't understand how this kind of project can exist and its not picking up volume. Something is not right with the coin otherwise people would be marketbuying the hell out of it.

Probit volume is garbage, that's why. When this hits Binance it's gonna take off, never mind Coinbase.

Render has much better performance and less friction for end users.
If you think there's no market segment for rendering digital media then you're not even worth my time.

Guys, $1,20 Render and I will change my Gender. Make it happen!

Because they've been on no big exchanges and building out the infrastructure. Everything is coming aligned now. The CEO said he wants big exchanges this summer in rocket chat. Smart money has been in and now it's gaining traction.

>If you think there's no market segment for rendering digital media then you're not even worth my time.
what is reading comprehension
SMALL market
that doesn't need a damn coin

$1.20 Render and I will change my Gender.

This shit is going to $10 tho.

How small is the market, oh wise one? In dollars please.

> 10B+ cloud rendering market is too small
> also ignoring the AI market coming to rndr soon
ok user.

> multi-billion dollar movie industry is small
> launching with apple products for easy access to end users

Kill yourself

Attached: Screenshot_20200829-134446_Telegram.jpg (1080x2220, 744.53K)

now is the dip

>market for renting gpus isn't big enough to even discuss
Wewlad, brainlet IQ

if the coin goes 4x
the price for rendering will go 4x aswell

No, the token pays for rendering power. You'll get your dollar's worth of rendering power regardless, a single token will just get you more as the price increases

yes
it is small
how much of it do you think RNDR is going to capture versus just, you know, having a cloud service that doesn't involve shitcoining
sage

To word this better:
If the price goes up 4x then you'll need 1/4th of a token to get the same rendering done as when it was 1x

The weakness of the fud attempts here is so incredibly bullish. This thing is unfuddable.

Rndr would make an individual render farm more efficient. It's an augmentation, not a replacement

> how much will capture
Probably at least 50%. They literally have google cloud on board for their first tier and have beaten all other render clouds in price. They are working together with the largest 3D software makers like autodesk to directly integrate rndr into their software.
There is no other centralized rendering service that has the amount of industry support behind them as otoy/rndr has.

Attached: EggqgyQUwAAEtUx.png (585x228, 14.07K)

Do you even know who is behind RNDR? They already own a significant portion of the market with Octane. Their biggest competitor is probably Autodesk Arnold and they're already bending the knee and providing support for RNDR.

This is a no-brainer.

wrong

Attached: waeaea.png (1310x280, 25.17K)

>a single token will just get you more as the price increases
I made the rendercalculator.com website and I'm pretty sure this is wrong.

RNDR token is mapped to a unit of work called OctaneBench, and the amount of OctaneBench work you can exchange for 1 RNDR depends on the tier you're rendering with. Price of the token doesn't enter the equation at all, so if the price increases, you get less work done.
idk I always thought it was an oversight, but they can always manually adjust the amount of work you get for 1 RNDR to keep a good balance of profitability for miners and low cost for artists. That way if price goes up from all the demand, people won't stop using the network because it costs too much, but this is all speculation on my part.

Why can't they make it so that the price of a render job is calculated, and then the tokens needed is render job price/render token price.

That is a huge problem that as the price of a render token increases then it becomes more expensive to do jobs.

> quoting two random people.

mobile.twitter.com/JulesUrbach/status/1295831278575448065

Fuck off brainlet. You can't even FUD properly

yeah thats why it doesnt pump

It already pumped from 8 cents. If there was a peg why wasn't it always 25 cents? Low iq FUD.

How does this counter what he posted?

How many times do you need to hear it, the CEO has said it himself multiple times:

They bought the tokens from probit to sell them to artists at a stable price of 25c when the price was low. As soon as this buyback is used up, they will readjust to the new market price if they do another buy back - why would the buy at a loss ?

You don't understand. Right now with the price of RNDR a job that costs 100 tokens will cost 25 dollars.

However, lets say the coin moons and is now 1 dollar. This means that the same job now costs 100 dollars.

That is a 4x markup to the artist, why would they still use the RNDR network? At that point there would probably be a cheaper solution.

This guy gets it

Man the fud is so weak