It is interesting that some shady characters have suddenly gone dark and a new clone pops up, with the first shill being in a Statera thread, run by a team of unknowns who obviously copied Statera's approach to deflation with the Balancer pools, being very familiar with the working of the project despite never being seen around it or any of its discussion.
QQQFanon has been telling us for a month that Noke has been working on something.
"Ryan from Statera" has recently "left crypto to work on his Master's" (again) after being involved in a rug pull with Equus. In case you missed that he was the main name behind it that lured people in.
A throwaway personality was the "head" of Equus and his angle was advanced math student. Equus was a very bad pointless scam but at the heart of it was that they would dazzle you with staking returns where you were (surprise) penalized for selling, keep the token locked, and then they eventually said the staking token could be used to vote for literally ANYTHING, because they had no use case so they figured being able to do everything with it was a good line.
On your guard anons.
Asher Nelson
Ive been watching etherscan today. Former STAGGOTS selling all STA for XMM
Blake Edwards
Definite Moon, will outshine STA by a large margin. Get in before we take off! Moonsuit ready
Matthew Brown
This is a rehashed scamcoin that rugged back in July. Don't give these scammers any fucking money. Let their village starve.
>Former STAGGOTS selling all STA for XMM Post transactions
Honestly this sketched me out at first, but the charts don't lie. It's like a gut feeling. If statera is doing so much work, this is the same fucking thing with out a hack, so there is no bad news. Telegram community is legit. token burn increasing the price makes this a comfy hold. Its all spergs and good vibes. Im holding these bags till a dex listing at least or 1$. Dont be dumb user, get in now or regret
Jace Roberts
It happens to have the same name. You fucking retard. Only a goddamned smoothbrained mongoloid could believe that a scammer would launch two scams WITH THE SAME FUCKING NAME. How fucking stupid do you think people are? Or is it just because you judge everyone by your own measure? Your intellectual level would make you run two consecutive scams without even bothering to change the name, so you think no one else would see nothing fishy? Jesus Christ almighty, this actually made me a little mad.
reminder- liquidity is locked for 16 months. There is no mint function. The dev is an autistic sperg math wiz. No pajeets, niggers or trannies on the team. Audit being worked on literally as we speak. Listing likewise, as is a better website and possibly logo. All this with 400 holders, and a laughable market cap. This is going stratospheric from here. We're so early, its fucking atrocious not to be balls in. Join now or cry later.
Jordan Thomas
Coingecko demand already done, i've heard of the medium article finished this week-end. The hacken audit was supposedly started about 24h ago.
Isaac Jackson
Thank you for eliminating my FUD. I hope this moons!
Benjamin Cook
Fucking hell i love it
Nolan Miller
New leg up. I'm having difficulties concealing that boner
Jesus Christ, at 1 dollar I'll have 120 thousand fucking dollars from an initial investment of 30 dollars. This is insane. My only regret is not dropping an eth or two. Christ, I dropped half an eth on fucking ZZZ, and it dropped like a rock right after, AND my pool got hacked! Win some lose some I guess, and a lesson learned.
Colton Mitchell
Sell your organs, you will be able to buy synthetic non perishable ones. Maybe even get a Neuralink.
Daniel Wilson
I have seen at least two other instances of scammers rehashing the same name for a scam. They already have a domain name and other shit with the same name, so why not reuse it? The logo is clearly a derivative of the other one, too. Even if it wasn't a scam, it is still just a clone
Wyatt Diaz
Sorry user. This is my first investment into a new token so I'm pretty nervous. Only been in crypto for about 3 weeks, but it's been a lot of fun lurking on here.
Leo Bailey
dr;ns
Ayden Sullivan
"The logo is clearly a derivative of the other one" Sir you need to get your eyes checked, sir.
Nathaniel Jenkins
>Simple geometric shapes inside a circle >One uses triangles, one uses rhombuses C'mon man, you are telling me those aren't made by the same person who has to come up with 20 different logos a month, so they don't put much effort into them?
