Dividend shilling thread

I['m afraid the oil price will stay

I've been sliding into vale and ko. I think they're going to do well. Xom under 40 is worth averaging into imo. I'll be slow there for a while.

>renewables
Currently unsustainable
>ev
Currently unviable
The better argument is uranium. Oil demand is likely to pick up. China will be starving for resources at the tail end of the short term.

>dividends
lmao cringe

I doubled my stocks in RDS when it dumped. Still positive it'll go back up and it'll be relevant for atleast 10 years before I'd consider kicking it out of my portfolio. Oil isn't going anywhere soon.

>atleast 10 years
Probably 20 to 50.

Don't be like me. I fell for the leveraged mREIT jew
>MORL
>MRRL
You can look what happened to those; they were auto-liquidated in March by the eternal Swiss because NAV dropped $0.04 below $5 (triggered their auto-redeem clause).

Before that, yield was 20%-30%. For me it was like $8k per year. It was my "retire-by-age-30" plan A kek. Just turned 30, so time for plan B

Right now there is still REML, and unleveraged REM and MORT for 12% yields

Attached: Moar_Krabs.jpg (998x751, 54.11K)

Some REITs are a good buy now, some are good all the time. Right now mREITs and apartment REITs like AIV are still ok buys. I'd never DRIP these but would buy the crashes every time.

Some specialty REITs are really overlooked too. AMT and WY are great to DCA for ghe foreseeable future.

I'd never fuck with industrial or office REITs though, especially not office since companies realized they can eliminate occupancy charges by having people work from home.

>renewables
>unsustainable
>renewing
ok

>ev
>non viable
>already in production and practice

>china
china is tjhe biggest renewables pusher

There is really no argument for mREITs, since mREITs are leveraged heavily (usually 5x) even if you buy an unleveraged asset, and equity REITs historically generate comparable total returns while only being 2x leveraged

You must be retarded. We don't have the technology to make the materials consumption sustainable for renewable energy and ev. It's not going to work out without many scientific breakthroughs. We're still prototyping this technology. It really shouldn't be rolling out at scale. Go be stupid in /smg/.

Are you kidding me? The return on energy for modern wind turbines is somewhere around 6-12 months and return on investment ~3 years, I just hate the fact that every tech stock in existence has been priced in and sold off by early investors during IPO hypes

Isn't that completely due to the subsidies the owners get for installing them though? I don't really have a horse in this race but that was my understanding. People mostly do renewable to abuse tax cuts/subsidies/grants on multiple levels of government.

I like dividend ETFs in general (VYM, SCHD, SPHD) and mostly aristocrats like JNJ, MMM, etc. Most Zig Forums anons will never understand a basic compounding formula and the value of dividend growth investing, and will instead blow out their crypto accounts on margin every two months for the rest of their life until they an hero.

SDIV is trash that has only ever depreciated in value, a literal scam

don't chase yields, a healthy 3-5% yield is what you should look for to get sustainability

Of all the types, I personally see hydro and wind as much further along, but the maintenance costs make them difficult to profit

Yes, especially on solar and ev. We really need nuclear and uranium (and for the plants to have a consistent design to make them actually efficient).

That's the price for a 10% yield, just look at oil and telecomm and tobacco. Slightly lower yield and they are just giant s&p 500 eternal crab companies.

I did find out that mREITs are not even considered Real Estate, they are classified in the Financial sector.

RWX is the only actual REIT I still hold.
>AMT, WY, DCA
Adding these to the watchlist, thanks

residential solar and wind is extremely inefficient due to the overhead of labor sometimes being much greater than the cost of the panels, I'm talking about the . But subsidies or not, there is a return on energy versus 0 return on energy which is always worse

Fuck divvies unless you are a poor fag. They get taxed way too much if you are in high income bracket.
GARBAGE

For me it's the phore blockchain, I'm so lucky to be in possession of $phr

>VYM
>SCHD
>SPHD
Even with compounding divs you still get less total return in all of these than the SPY the large majority of the time. Why even bother?

Can someone tl;dr me on dividends?

because to get the larger returns from SPY you'd have to liquidate shares. But no one says you can't have both a divvie portfolio and a growth portfolio, which is what i do, and both reap great rewards.