Do you actually have to lie, cheat, steal, manipulate, gaslight and push people to submission to be on top?
Is there any way to gain power through righteousness? Or do you need to be Machiavellian to other Machiavellian people and spare the 'good' ones?
those things don't work long term user. you need God
read up on what the bible says of perfect justice
>Do you actually have to lie, cheat, steal, manipulate, gaslight and push people to submission to be on top?
The people who don't do this will get taken advantage of by people who do.
>love each other as I have loved you
Are you retarded user?
>have to lie, cheat, steal, manipulate, gaslight and push people to submission to be on top?
>checked
Yes, you have actually to be a kike.
I used to be kind and warm to people, even to strangers then I realised i've been shat on regardless of how truthful, honorable and kind I was. I put a stop to that and trained myself to cut off emotions, since then I've been lying, cheating and taking from those lesser than me including my closest relatives who love their little user
These are questions I’ve struggled with as well and it does seem very much as though one needs to set aside things like morals and ethics to rise in the system as it stands. Even if one is able to maintain one’s moral integrity during the rise, power eventually seems to corrupt everyone. Sociopaths seem able to navigate the paths to wealth and power much more easily than honest, moral people
If you live a righteous life, you'll feel rewarded in your self before you die.
If you lie, cheat, steal, manipulate, gaslight and push people to submission to be on top then you'll have a lot of amazing moments in life but destroy yourself mentally and emotionally.
yes faggot
To be “on top” yeah I think so, not to be comfy though
Read 48 Laws of Power. Pretty much teaches you how to be respected in the work environment. It's an extremely popular book among elites so it has been proven to work.
You need to be a dick to get shit done. You also need to prove to people why you are important. If people forget why they need you, then that means you can easily be replaced.
Greeting fellow Paladin
great book
Believe it or not Dale Carnegie’s “How to win friends and influence people” is another amazing book. It’s quaint in how dated it is but if you can build a persona around the sort of shit in there it does actually seem to work
it is in the very question you ask. to be "on top" implies to be above others. of course you need to abuse to be in a position of power over others. such is the nature of the definition. to be righteous is to forgo the desire to be above others.
I realised this too. You get nothing for being nice. Being a prick gets you everything. Draw the line with family though
>Be top 1% academicaly
>Get a comfy +$300k job
You made it without being a kike if you dont become too ambitious.
This is what I'm thinking about when I ask the question. I've listened to Robert Greene talk before.
The way I see it is there are 4 main categories of people:
1. The Gray Stock: People that arent necessarily submissive or aggressive. They can bend either way depending on the situation. They can rise up to any of the next 3 groups
2. The Helpers: People that will never be aggressive and will always be submissive. They might be middle managers or workers, but they will always know their place is under someone else
3. The Machiavelli / The Faceless: People that will manipulate, cheat, steal, gaslight to get what they want. They have no allegiance to anyone but themselves. Aka Satanists
4. The Righteous / The Blessed: People that recognize their power over others and know the right situations to be forceful and the right situations to give lenience. Marcus Aurelius
>to be on top
Yes, but it's also possible to live beside the greasy pile instead of in or on it. If you want to be righteous you need a trade to ply.
>t. submissive wageslave
4. I prefer the term ”Paladin”
i'm teeterimg on the edge of total acceptance in this regard
Yes, you do need to act like Donald J. Trump to be rich.
Read Anti-Machiavel. Written by someone much more successful than Machiavelli. Frederick the Great, who was also Voltaire's best student :)
Yes it gets you there easier than if you don't do it. The only reason to be righteous is if you don't care about that and believe you are doing something greater than simply being on top.
Be warned that socipaths eventually lose everything they have built in terms of relationships because all of the lies come crashing down like every 5 years or so, this may apply to you depending on the situation.
build up your treasure in heaven.
Jesus is Lord
No you don't have to be evil to get at the top in life. That is silly.
Anyone who starts thinking like this is being corrupted. People will hurt you and do things to try to get ahead of you in life. There's no need to lower yourself to do the same.
You can succeed righteously.
>lie, cheat, steal, manipulate, gaslight and push people to submission
This is the cheap and easy way to get things done on earth. Satan pushes this. Rotting in hell waits those subhumans.
It's very simple. If you help people, they want you to succeed. This is the core of voluntarism.
1. All agreements must be mutually beneficial.
2. Do not initiate force
With force defined as the intentional removal of personal choice through manipulation, threats or violence.
Screenshot this post and try to follow it. I'm a millionaire thanks to this ideology. It is based on the works of Tesla, Socrates and Epictitus, who said be the best you. If you are a ruler, be the best ruler. If you are a slave, be the best slave. You can be better if you stop thinking and start acting.
Here is an example of someone who is trying to lower your guard OP, crush him and climb higher.
What happens when a righteous needs to lie cheat or steal to get what they want? Might not a faceless know when to be forceful and when to give slack? You have crossed personality traits, motivations, and skills into some sort of ill-conceived cosmology. If people were so simple, this type of analysis would be common knowledge.
Bladee dharma will lead u on the path to enlightenment user
Then what I want isn't worth getting. The opposite of moral relativism is moral absolutism. The worse you act, the more paranoid you become and the less you enjoy life. The opposite is also true. Why would you want to be miserable?