Massive retard here, hold 35k link

HAHA
No.

You are so fucking wrong lmao

Terse replies usually point to insecurity, I'm ready to answer any arguments you have.

I haven't believed in btc since 2017 when transactions took 10 days to complete.

I believe any *cryptocurrency* is a joke, and btc fails to deliver on what it actually sets out to do.

In the case of ETH/CL, I consider the token more of a share of the network, rather a currency. To be consistent, this is why I have not, and will not invest in any "currency" cryptos, for example, monero.

Will I potentially miss out on gains? Of course, we all are betting on what we believe in, and we can only use current information to have a general idea of what is to come.

tl;dr bitcoin is an ancient shitcoin and needs to die

yfuel

>Link is built entirely around memes and a naive understanding of how technology/encryption/software works
This isn't an argument, it's just a retarded statement made to troll. Therefore, there is no counter argument to be made nor does it deserve any. Dilate.

Institutional wealth isn't looking at it as a currency. Cryptocurrency has never been used as a viable currency, in fact "use case" is dropping. This should be a hint. No use case has ever been found despite thousands of ideas and projects essentially forcing crypto into every market conceivable.

They are looking at it as a store of value i.e. the gold of the future. But Millenials are more interested in digital assets than they are gold, and there is a huge transfer of wealth that will be occurring over the next decade. Bitcoin doesn't have to be a store of value AND a currency. It does one of those things very well already.

fidelitydigitalassets.com/bin-public/060_www_fidelity_com/documents/FDAS/bitinvthessisstoreofvalue.pdf

BUY BAT

Chainlink is 150X ICO user. Big boy gains are over. DIA should be heavily considered before it's $25+

What is a non sequitur.

dumped my bags for bat a while ago
maybe it will be a store of value, not really interested in it for that reason either.

>I'm talking out of my ass but maybe they'll think I'm cool if I use a Latin term.

dumped my bat bags for link a while ago**
by that I mean in 2018

It’s an old proverb meaning „fuck your mother if you want fuck“

I'll extrapolate since you can't form an argument. The problem is that there's nothing Link can do that encryption/software cannot. There is no need to insure a data process with a cryptocurrency. Encryption secures countless data processes that are flowing through your skull right now. Modern encryption is solid, hackers don't crack encryption, they use creative ways to find vulnerabilities.

Take a sports betting website for example, countless network transactions that all need to be 100% correct, untampered with and accurate, anything less would be risking a chain reaction of financial loss. Insurance is often cited as being Chainlink could be useful for but it has a very limited amount of uses. Insurance isn't binary. Chainlink belongs in the realm of crypto, the financial paradigms have no reason to buy your bags.

kek

>no reason to insure data with a crypto
csoonline.com/article/2130877/data-breach/the-16-biggest-data-breaches-of-the-21st-century.html

Attached: 1573955671210.jpg (750x723, 67.46K)

>Modern encryption is solid, hackers don't crack encryption
>
Take a sports betting website for example, countless network transactions that all need to be 100% correct, untampered with and accurate, anything less would be risking a chain reaction of financial loss. Insurance is often cited as being Chainlink could be useful for but it has a very limited amount of uses. Insurance isn't binary. Chainlink belongs in the realm of crypto, the financial paradigms have no reason to buy your bags.

All of this is centralized and non-transparent. How can you achieve true randomness, for example, on an online casino?

You lack the vision, you trust the brands, you are a consumercuck

>institutional wealth is looking at seriously investing in an asset where its largest whale and founder is a mystery and could come back and dump everything
BTC maximalists are the dumbest cunts out there by far. There is no refuting this.

Find me an example where modern encryption was hacked. Google your heart out.

Dunno dude. Team is led by a marketing guy. As a marketing guy myself, I know they're mostly scammers

Bitcoin isn't going to moon anymore.

If you want 1.5-2x returns max just buy a decent stock. Crypto is high risk investment anyway. You buy it to 20-1000x your money.

> Ftm
> Team from university of sydney
No thanks

If millennials are more interested in digital assets than physical ones, it stands to reason that NFTs will zoom in value

Link is centralized. Transparency is another issue (some corporations don't want transparency). Code doesn't care about trustlessness. It simply executes based on instructions (if x then y).

>How can you achieve true randomness, for example, on an online casino?

Link making sure the data feeds are accurate have nothing to do with the code that makes the online casino work. You'd have to get a copy of the source code and read it.

>You lack the vision
I understand the Link prophecies. A world where corporations have "linked" together in a myraid of ways via a third party crypto staking mechanism will require an amount of infrastructure that is comical. And there is no demand. Give me an example of a use case.

Not a maximalist. I'll wait for you to come up with a crypto that isn't astonishingly centralized. BTC and ETH are probably amongst the least centralized at this point.

Uhhh ok.
vice.com/en_us/article/z3emm3/encrochat-encro-hacked-encrypted-phones
vice.com/en_us/article/5dz9qx/encrochat-hacked-shutting-down-encrypted-phone
Can't forget this gem
defenseone.com/ideas/2020/01/saudi-arabias-phone-hacking-shows-we-need-better-encryption-not-backdoors/162589/
Here is a qoute:
Saudi Arabia’s Phone Hacking Shows We Need Better Encryption — Not Backdoors
End-to-end encryption isn’t good enough. Files and cloud backups need strong crypto as well.

Attached: Screenshot_20200907-022301_Chrome.jpg (1080x2220, 706.76K)

whats your net worth?

Provide Liquidity to Balancer, YFI, or YFV

By doing this you will give a shit about the current price action because you make constantly gains. But it is not riskless as if the shitcoin that you pair to your Chad Linkies start to dump then you will encounter get a life of maximum pain.

Play it safer then use Balancer pools and pair your Chainlink to ETH, USDC, WETH.

Check predictions.exchange/balancer/None
to find out which pair is the most profitable one.

If you want to make massive gains then you will have to wait for YFLINK to open their LP or you start now at YFV.

Risk-resistant LINK and KNC chads seem to prefer YFV right now.

Attached: ambvboeoc2651.png (1888x923, 277.13K)

I forgot to mention that you should keep an eye on arcx.game/

They are getting currently audited by Quantstamp. It is something like MakerDAO just with the difference that you can use any asset to create 1 USD stable coin.