What the FUCK is going on with chainlinks volume. this is seriously unprecedented

what the FUCK is going on with chainlinks volume. this is seriously unprecedented.

Attached: pepe3.jpg (218x218, 8.07K)

sirgay is selling link to partners in preparation for the staking go live

Attached: 1598552701209.webm (360x360, 2.16M)

Nothing unusual going on here, I really don't see why you would consider it unprecedented.

Attached: linkwtfcap.png (353x141, 10.08K)

gonna get dumped.

Why?

This would make sense, but do you have any other evidence?

It would honestly be unbelievably based if the team was like, "What? We said Q3, and we meant it. We weren't going to whore it out at our convention just to pump your little bags. "

Diarrhea of a lifetime.

Attached: PaneerKingofMumbai.jpg (211x239, 5.42K)

Staking went live...

pic related

Attached: Capture12.jpg (1357x1161, 141.52K)

rich anons bought

Attached: 23.jpg (1569x804, 135.67K)

>the royal family bought

Attached: 1595043888159.jpg (600x600, 27.68K)

this is the answer

could also just be algos or cmc spazzing, messari says much less

6.45 Billion in volume on the 10th according to coingecko. Unreal.

huh? what the fuck how is that possible

I thought that site was based Korea

Now we get new bots?

It’s a glitch sadly
Going to sleep now goodnight

Checked but not that impressive compared to other days in August

Looking on this scammy exchange and I think there is a miscalculation on exchange volume. They don't have the supply for this kind of wash trading. Not even Hedge Funds would have access to this kind of volume

more than 80% of is fake volume on citex

This

problem, newfag?

Attached: file.png (398x57, 1.87K)

>top volume coins are privacy coins
what did they mean by this?

the rug

alright since you guys have made 8 threads about this today I looked and its because a tiny asian exchange no one has ever heard of called Citex has wash traded 4 billion dollars. that's it.

wash trading on CITEX

Why is it wash trading it though?

goodnight :)

because if you look at the implied volatility of a perpetual it seems like it could be anything, but when you account for the decay of the extrinsic value compounded by the timeframe*apy for the week you can clearly see it has to be wash trading.

Checked and all for a Jason Parser
Let that sink in

Attached: 1561355027516.jpg (960x749, 59.45K)

because there is a grand total of 5k LINK on the sell book

just kidding, 1500 LINK

Attached: no liquidity.png (516x499, 48.26K)

1150 when i took that screencap

Nigga he asked why? Not how.

not too sure what garbage exchange that is

CITEX, the exchange responsible for the volume ATH on LINKUSDT and LINKBTC