SWIFT GPI 3 DAYS AWAY

1 hour webinar, either its everything Sergey has been cooking or its a nothingburger like usual.

Attached: 20200911_075429.jpg (1440x2256, 370.3K)

Ya this is nothing. Anyway we don’t need swift plenty of other things going on

Link, if used, will be white labeled and we’ll probably never know.

swift gpi is nothing to do with chainlink

Why would I be interested in a Swift Gay Penis Insertion?

if the swift link breadcrumb is true, link should be triple digits right now

Exactly this. Fucking sibos bullshit you’d think 3 years later this would even be on our radar and it’s not close. One of the major major disappointments of my life I thought it would happen back when I bought on day 1

Thomas shot down the Link gpi rumors and stated SWIFT is no longer interested

This, you will never hear swift mention link. desu It's not even that exciting anymore much more exciting stuff coming these next 12 months strap in and if you swing be careful

it’s not lmao fucking new fags, stop hoping for nothing

Swift gpi is not link
Swift gpi link is link

>t. newfag

Checked

No one knows qualitatively what the Link token will be used for as far as collateral goes. So saying "it should be worth X dollars" is completely meaningless at this point. The truth is that no one has any idea how smart contracts will be used in the future, especially relating to things like Swift GPI. It's not like every transaction would need to reference a Link node. Only third party transactions that do some sort of automated function would require the use of a Chainlink node, and in those instances, it wouldn't be related to Swift...it would be a third party application that extends some of that Swift GPI functionality.

I think a lot of linkies don't really fundamentally understand what Chainlink is and for some reason think it is necessary for every sort of transaction, financially or otherwise, in the world.

Attached: 3876B3F9-F0F9-4277-BDD0-2B8896D02296.png (1334x750, 356.82K)

Any fellow oldfags who were in that fun Swift webinar in 2018? My question was addressed and that pajeet misspoke and said "chainlink gpi" KEK, good times at 40 cents

>breadcrumb
Aren't breadcrumbs things that aren't 100% confirmed?

You have no idea what you’re talking about newfag

Me too. Making over $100k per year on a $10k investment has been extremely disappointing. I thought I would have AT LEAST made $1M per year. This has been the scam of all scams.

>think it is necessary for every sort of transaction, financially or otherwise, in the world.
it’s not?

cope

Well I’m at 650k on 20k investment but still look at the bitcoin peeps right

What did sergey mean by this?

Attached: 1E081540-CEE3-446D-8950-CD5F5E3AAEFA.jpg (1200x677, 96.69K)

The Swift GPI Link
Which is the settlement layer for smart contract applications
Is a chainlink oracle that will be “pinged” to settle transactions on and enterprise grade DLT applications
No one knows how frequently this will be. Also SWIFT as the node operator can set the price.
Could be 0.001 LINK for all we know

Swift GPI and Swift GPI Link are two different things you fucking retard

Then what the fuck are you complaining about? You've made nearly a quarter million dollars per year for doing nothing...

retard

back in the good old days

It means that chainlink can be used as an intermediary between legacy systems and Ethereum and/or Hyperledger. Is that not obvious? You don't have to be a "partner" working with a company in order to use their APIs. For example, when I use a Google Maps API to put directions to my store on my web page, that doesn't mean my web designer has partnered with Google (or that I have). I think it's pretty clear that the people at Chainlink are familiar with using Swift's APIs and are using that knowledge to build middleware. Chainlink needs Swift, Swift doesn't need Chainlink. That's how I view it at least. This doesn't make Chainlink any less interesting or useful.

I remember that, can't believe it was 2 years ago. I think he said "gpi chain link"

swift gpi is not even blockchain related
the absolut state of biz

Problem is that it was a fake out. If sibos was true then all I needed was 60k link. I would have bought 2x if I thought it wouldn’t be the case maybe 3x or 4x

The breadcrumb is true imo. Look at the chart up thread. GPI link is coming, and soon. Even if link is whitelabeled, there will be a big increase in network traffic if it’s being used.

Learn not to speak when you don’t know what you’re talking about you FUCKING NEWFAG NIGGER RETARD

Attached: 4A049E82-5380-4386-8D8A-469FF7206C94.jpg (1377x582, 393.66K)

Nothing you could have bought over the past two years would have out-performed Chainlink. So your complaining is inane. Your choosing to believe in narratives you can't prove isn't anyone else's fault. Just stop being retarded and appreciate how lucky you are financially.

POST YFW XRP KILLS LINK

Attached: 1599059984010.jpg (1000x700, 298.33K)

PSD2 deadline is on December 31.

Attached: 1597772093535.jpg (841x778, 240.64K)

Checked. I was there, I remember someone managed to record it and shared that particular part with Zig Forums.

Not saying it’s anyone’s fault CL didn’t mislead us either but come on if the first crumb is a presentation and an award at sibos what else would you be lead to think

just stop retard

I’ll take that as you being to immature to admit your defeat, so you’ll switch to a stance of
“Hehe just trolling bro...”
Fuck off