Should I sell my Link and buy STA...

So I should sell my Link and by Axia Protocol?

if you want to kill yourself once LINK hits $1000, sure

So I should hold onto my Link stack?

He gets it

Attached: 72ED85F6-EDE9-4133-A7A0-5C5CBA2ED081.jpg (1600x900, 153.59K)

Sta is at 8 million mc and works as intended. Link is obviously way more important for crypto as whole but it has 4 billion mc. Id say sta has more room for growth but you do you

I think I’m going to go 50-50 in STA and axia protocol

Rip

I understand how hard it is too keep ahold of Link at this point. I bought at $2.3 last year and lost 40% swinging it and trying to chase shitcoin pumps shilled on Zig Forums and CT. Nothing panned out like it would have if I'd just hodled
Next September some user is going to be frustrated that Link can't break the $71-79 channel. And you'll remember the time you sold a chunk of your stack at $12.62 to buy some piece of shit project named Statera

If I don't intend to buy btc or with, why would I buy this rather than just buying link?

man what pros do you see on STA??

man link is scam, the only thing that maintains link is the community, the project is unprofitable

look at this and don't cry

Attached: link.png (942x530, 118.35K)

nice double doubles, but how are ETH or BTC profitable?

sounds good. join the axia tele to keep up to date with the v2 swap
/axiaprotocol

fact , give u the reason in this, but Sergey still owns the 60% of the total supply, that makes me think link is gonna go down when he sells.

Because Link is the standard--there's only 1 billion Link and there will be billions of requests per day
No doubt the team will have to push the cost to below $0.20 per once every major purchase made on the web needs several Link RNGs to ensure adequate security

what pros do you see in STA, never hear from this project

... why don't you go ask this on any of the 5 STA shill threads that are constantly up

No

link at 10 was the golden ticket. you can like triple your money now only.

*when he sells*
Sergey has built a $12 billion tech company without needing to sell equity to a single investor. All he had to do was sell 38% of tokens to the public. 35% is in dev wallets. Name another company of similar valuation where founders and other top employees own that much of their company at this stage of a venture
Sergey knows the long-term health if his company depends on being able to operate off of periodic 500k (used to be 700k if you remember) dumps until the nodes are profitable. Typical tech companies these days need 8-12 years to be profitable
Chainlink Labs is currently hiring 20-35 additional employees. This would be the third or fourth VC round if this weren't crypto where an ICO has already taken place
Even many marines don't realize how comfy of a hold this is. They just understand the tech, but now the org fundamentals are starting to catch up
Fudding Link at this point is like comparing Oracle in 96 or Apple in 79 to some startup that's still in a garage but "looks promising." Anyone who doesn't understand that is trying to invest based on CS knowledge alone and has no idea what the life cycle of a successful tech corporation looks like
>t. VC law fag

haven't seen any, link me

>t mumbai street shitter
this board needs flags so bad