> Is LINK being suppressed?
If yes, who's doing it, and what's their end goal?
Is LINK being suppressed?
Chase Cruz
Leo White
No everyone is just dumping it to get on more exciting projects.
Lincoln Moore
>more exciting projects
name one
Jeremiah Brooks
>he thinks it's "price suppression"
>he can't accept it's Sergey dumping for weeks
Ryan Perez
>more exciting projects
bahahahaha
Levi Sullivan
Yes, by cz and his chink friends.
Luke Long
>Sergey dumping for weeks
>so he can aggressively expand and create a monopoly empire of data
bullish
Ian Scott
Yes they inadvertently let it pump 30x in a few months but now they're suppressing it, they'd rather accumulate at 12$ than 30 cents because it's more efficient.
It's impossible that people take profit after 3000%, literally impossible.
The fact that every coin who pumped hard follow the same curve than link now is actually just a coincidence, other coins were naturally going down but link is so special there's an international Kabbalah going after it.
I'm sorry, you could be rich with link worth at least 2k$ now but they won't let you.
Landon Howard
sorry it was me. bought ico and just managed to load off the last bit of my stack.
i'm all out so no more dumping from here dw
Juan Walker
> Is LINK being suppressed?
No, it's a $12 stablecoin, deriving it's price from two big Mac meals (or a quarter serger as we call it). This is clearly stated in the whitepaper.