BTC and ETH doesn't scale
XSN is capable of instant BTC/LTC transactions and soon integrating ETH with almost zero fees
>Give me ONE reason as to why you aren't holding this GEM?
BTC and ETH doesn't scale
XSN is capable of instant BTC/LTC transactions and soon integrating ETH with almost zero fees
>Give me ONE reason as to why you aren't holding this GEM?
Other urls found in this thread:
google.com
twitter.com
And?
BTC is abandoned ware and LTC is double abandoned ware
Btc is digital gold. Xsn appears to make it easily tradable gold
>2016 shism
>2017/18 fucked by wallstreet shorters
>2018 second shism
>2019 crabs along
>2020 loses core devs left and right
>needs third parties to scale
>still only a handful of tps
certainly gold
xsn masternodes will not run the raiden nodes as it's eth based and not a btc fork. so what's the fucking point.
Have you seen gold price and volatility? Seems alright to be
Wtt????
You are not worthy enough to talk about THE MAN.
Xsn nodes will host the dex on stage 3. Plus masternode can be used for other things such as watchtowers.
they wont host the raiden nodes.
Despite what you said Bitcoin still dominates the majority of the crypto marketcap. This dex will allow that value to flow into other coins.
Why do they need to host raiden nodes? How do you know they won't?
they can't, because they need to run on eth mainnet to broadcast the channel closures. read their documentation
>why
because the amount of nodes, and the capacity of the nodes, is very crucial to a dex don't you think? if you can't control them, like you can the xsn nodes, then what's the point.
should've stuck with the original xsnETH and xsnEOS route which they had lined out in the whitepaper. but oh well, what to do.
okay, lets be honest for a moment
you fucked up. At one hand there are a bunch of extreme late comers that got tricked into food scams got burnt so hard that they wont come back, and on the other, you have a group of fanatics from 2016/17 who decided Sergey Nazarov is going to be their Messiah, most in such an extreme plus, that they wont switch to anything else or go back to bitcoin, at best use pump and dumps to accumulate more
At the same time the world economy is going to the shitter because the repo market trick and private banks having made central banks their bitches forcing hard inflation so no new dumb money isn't arriving for crypto. The gig is over. The fanatics will keep buying, with little they have, the rest is dependent on whales swinging at extreme high risk. You hedge your bets.
If the world economy goes down that's good for crypto. T. Smart contracts.
>Companies technically insolvent take risks in new tech
>Companies that barely survive and don't get loans to pay for their workers take high risks
As said, hedge your bets
XSN masternodes all run ETH full nodes which can police others with checks that they also are running full nodes. They can easily check their peers are running a L2 client by opening and maintaining state channels with each other, if no channel no client, no reward.
am retard. did you disprove his fud?
I have an MN and I will ask the same question I do in all these threads.
When, not as in "in X number of build outs" or "probably by the end of the year", but what is the date confirmed by the Devs, at which we can expect the Raiden integration to be complete?
The answer is that there is no date. It's been "just around the corner" since 2019.
IF they deliver, it will be huge and my money will 10x. IF they don't, I will lose 1X my money.
But until that point, this project will not moon. It will at best crab. And we don't know when that point will come, or more importantly, IF it will come.
Based tech bro.
Nice, fudders btfo.
>will run
well, the day you do that is the day sn will email you, because as of right now it's impossible to run an eth node on btc forks. no matter how technical you try to sound in the latter half of you post.
>Will run
No where does he say 'will run'.
Chico army! To arms! To arms!
Favor chico army. Just got totally disrespected, and ripped off by this business in Chico. Bought a 500 dollar ph meter, which has already broke I went in and tested both pieces, the probe and testing body. Both things passed on their tester, individually, but when you tried with them both connected, it wouldn't read. He told me they couldn't refund, as both pieces passed the test. even though he was sitting their watching it not work. He then told me, I should maybe take better care of my ph meter and to get the fuck out. Told him he will regret being a shitty merchant. Time to bombard his business with 1 star reviews. Go army
...they don't need to, dude.
master nodes don't host lightning channels either. your point is irrelevant.
See
how can i run a masternode with XSN stored in a ledger
this is fud. bitcoin is diaper doodoo.
but XSN has invented and implemented new unique and practical innovations that leave me quite impressed. this is a long hold for me.
the current xsn client is based on pivx. all you need to run a node is the tx id of a 15k xsn transaction to yourself IIRC. so you can probably easily store the keys or wallets of the receiving address on your ledger
The next major update will support both staking from cold storage and running a node from cold storage/ the light wallet.
Best MN project out there
you do realize a master node is just allocated compute space with a core wallet running on it, right? the install pack for the dex doesn't have to be a part of the core wallet for the node to be considered functional. in fact you don't even need the dex rewards to be tied to the core wallet at all; you'd just need some way to signal to the dex hub software that it's on an active master node contributing to consensus, in order to unlock/enable dex fee sharing with that particular hub.
this is all theory of course but it's not difficult to think of elegant validation checks for this stuff, and since nodes would in theory have a myriad of uses in a mature environment, having that extensibility will be key.
lol the devs don't give dates. it's fairly common to see that type of practice with legitimately innovative product developers.
if you don't like it you're free to take down your node and invest the collateral elsewhere, but you're not actually a node owner or you wouldn't be such a shitty sniveling bitch about well-intentioned development practices from a team that has never intentionally misled it's investors.