Is anyone else rational as fuck and obviously know BSV is a scam and wright is an alchoholic schitzo but also very late at night wonder that there's the very slim chance he could be the one and it would be worth stocking up on a few BSV?
Are we the wrong ones?
Lucas Sullivan
Brayden Davis
I think what im inviting here is a small microscopic gateway for any BSV shills to give me a level headed pitch on why BSV is the real bitcoin
Connor Taylor
I don't think there is a chance that he's Satoshi. I do think Calvin Ayre will need to maintain an upward price channel in BSV if he wants new money to come in though. BSV would've probably had an easier time if they'd have not gone through with a Satoshi larp.
Parker Green
I think the complete opposite, that BSV is obviously the closest interpretation of the Bitcoin white paper and closest to the intention of Satoshi Nakamoto, and even despite patents, copyrights, international law, evidence and laying claim to the longest-running most stable and uncorrupted blockchain protocol with signature features fully intact and unbounded scaling capabilities, there is a very slim chance that crypto media bros and tech communists will convince the world that BSV is terrible similar to the way they control the mass media, through deception and social engineering.
Josiah Bell
>there's the very slim chance he could be the one
you should play the lottery rationally speaking
Evan Myers
No chance on earth he is Satoshi. He is a clever extroverted narcissist. Satoshi is a brilliant introverted autist.
Nicholas Taylor
Impossible. He is not Satoshi for many reasons. The way he claimed to mine the genesis block is incorrect. okex.com
Look up the pattern of mining and it proves without a doubt that he is not Satoshi. There are also other reasons he's not Satoshi, the white paper doesn't match him at all.
Satoshi imo was clearly a team of people lead by Nick Szabo.
Xavier Barnes
tell me why ultimately BSV will win out in the end im open to hearing it. Like specifically what's the strategy or key features that btc doesn't have that will ultimately see it take the top spot
Benjamin Foster
Posting real Satoj
Josiah Morales
Another thing that led to this thought was listening to Daniel Krawisz talk and seeing his blog post from a long time ago and thinking what does this man see that I don't. He's obviously very smart and independent thinker. What am I missing
Aiden Harris
craig likely knows who satoshi is, and that satoshi has entered some sort of nda in order to maintain blockstream and not get the assange treatment.
Craig's using this info to perpetrate a scam, which is kinda his MO. Get just enough edge on information on people to scam them
Tyler Reed
>Satoshi imo was clearly a team of people lead by Nick Szabo.
>Nick Szabo, James Bowery, Hal Finney
3 Satoshi email addresses
For the Three Satoshis
Jordan Hill
I'm not that user, but on a protocol level, I'd say BSV is closest to the Bitcoin originally mentioned by Satoshi. However, that alone does not necessarily mean that BSV will win.
Lucas Barnes
bsv is technologically superior to btc
the rest is politics and overall noise
Cooper Turner
Nick Szabo didn't even know, that Bitcoin is turing complete. He doesn't understand Bitcoin, because he didn't create it
I also got redpilled by Daniel. He's truly based.
BSV will win, if there is going to be people, corporations and institutions, that will want to make lots of fast and cheap transactions. If crypto is going to stay as a circlejerk of less than a million people around the world, from which most will hodl, and trade scams, than BSV will loose. In other words BSV could have superior tech, but still loose, because nobody wants to use it, but it's unlikely, that nobody will be interested in microtransactions. Google could make way more money with fees, over commercials.
Joseph Ross
Adam Back is real Satoji
Ryan Robinson
blockstream shill != satoshi
Caleb Bennett
No. You're simply just realizing you're not "rational as fuck" and instead are slightly retarded.
Jordan Taylor
please explain how
Jason Hughes
Nah. He's not qualified. The obvious answer is the obvious answer.
Jaxon Richardson
fine lets say its the closest to satoshi vision. why is this an advantage? satoshi wasn't Jesus (the codebase for example was ridden with bugs). why are terabyte blocks a high IQ thing and not just ridiculously unsustainable
Jackson Brown
Jesus Christ. Craig preaches people to work hard if they want to be successful, while you morons try to shill me worthless scam tokens. I fucking hate all of you goddamn shills.
Wyatt Taylor
20 years ago people used to have hard drives, that had tens of gigabytes at most. Now people have tens of terabytes, In 10 years terabyte blocks will be nothing. Making a 1MB limit is truly retarded. It artificially makes BTC into a "VIP" club
Jayden Parker
CSW != BSV
We have our own original thoughts. CSW is a workaholic. Just look at Calvin. He's everything opposite, of what CSW is saying.
Robert Gutierrez
This is not 2019 anymore, you're a thing of the past, old man
Noah Allen
I can honestly say I have never once considered buying this obvious scam.
the BSV shilling at this point is just getting sad.
Leo Williams
I think it'll be obvious BSV is what Satoshi Nakamoto created once the crypto market is gone 10 years from now and everyone will say they always knew this was going to happen and probably not a day before then.
People are using these coins to gamble and hope to get rich quick, no one is really being rewarded that much for being wrong or right at this point. Value-investing isn't yet a thing in the 'crypto markets.' Which is why BSV isn't so much overvalued or undervalued, but everything else sure is overvalued. You only need one blockchain and that is and always has been were it will end.
Kevin Baker
but it must take insane hardware for a node to process 1tb block every 10 minutes. or is the BSV idea that they don't care for individuals running nodes? (like etheream)
Colton Gutierrez
Specialization into huge mining farms. That's capitalism. The key factor in BSV's succes is being either marginally or way more efficient at literally everything its competitors do. It's impossible to micro-analyze everything in how BSV code interacts with actual human behavior and not come to that conclusion. Unless if you're a communist and use emotion logic over actual reason.
Beyond that, BitCoin at scale is a machine that sucks up and sorts all of the world's information in the Blacknet (others call it Metanet, but that's a bad name). None of what I'm saying is hyperbole, though all this will take probably decades.
Carter Perez
>Like specifically what's the strategy or key features that btc doesn't have that will ultimately see it take the top spot
Unbounded blocks and unbounded script length. This means fees are gonna stay incredibly lower than btc and eth, fees are already hurting their growth, while bsv keeps sub cent transaction fees allowing a plethora of applications that can only exist on a low fee blockchain like twetch (Twitter but you pay a couple cents per interaction), streamanity, peer game, powping.
IF bsv wins, it will be because the services built on top of it keep growing in popularity, bringing real users on chain, so it's a long game, wereas many coin play a short term marketing game and ignore regulations, but it's still not a given that bsv will win.
One good thing is that there is much more upside than downside. For example, Craig reputation cannot really go lower than this, even if he keeps making a fool of himself, the market has already priced in Craig being a scammed. But if there is a remote possibility he one day actually signs publicly with an early block, the upside is incredible (and consider that people like Gavin still swore under oath that they believe the private signing he witnessed was real)
Hudson Cooper
(still me) some relevant datapoints in pictures
Cameron Hughes
Jordan Peterson
Bitcoin (BSV) can do two things really well:
1.Eliminate the need for business processes and practices which currently cost corporations and governments hundreds of billions, if not trillions of dollars in overhead globally
2.Enable completely new online markets and private and public economies in which internet activity of all types can be instantly rewarded with negligible friction and no middlemen
These 2 statements alone encompass thousands of use cases and can literally start a fifth industrial revolution, completely online.
The problem (specifically with point #2) is a lot of powerful people will lose money, influence and power to the