>math.random()

Attached: chainlink.png (225x225, 3.29K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=O23MirKabvk
blog.chain.link/verifiable-random-functions-vrf-random-number-generation-rng-feature/
eprint.iacr.org/2017/099.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

While you shitpost, you can aslo listen to Sergey talking some backstory, how he came to space and what they are actually doing, in very simple way for brainlets.
Good podcast, very recommend.
youtube.com/watch?v=O23MirKabvk

Attached: buy.png (2048x1294, 2.68M)

sergeyDiceRollingInBedroom()

yeah but proving integrity in randomization is a big advancement for use cases such as gambling

Now prove it.

>protip: you can't.

Not just gaming/gambling but tons of other services and applications.

No users though.
Why ?

this made sense during covid19 lockdowns and I too was rolling dice along with serger for a bit of exercise (280 5'6" mutt master race here) but now it's just absurd to think Sergey will hire a "Head of Random" with seven years of dice rolling experience at a profession level to fulfil this verified random function.
Imaging waging for serger and getting paid to literally roll dice in the Chainlink Random Department

Attached: 049C81E102594E1BB9FDD16EF80F19A1.jpg (341x279, 24.15K)

>proving integrity in randomization

how more retarded can linkies even get at this point? you retards clearly don't understand compute or mathematics. It's unreal how fucking stupid you people are.

FUN will use VRF to keep anons having fun

Attached: sergeybiz.png (1540x1424, 2.43M)

> understand compute
if only we could understand the compute

Attached: 1597368667292.jpg (335x220, 49.2K)

Because Ethereum hasn't got their shit together yet with 2.0 and no real institution wants to build on 15 TPS high fees garbage.

Arbitrum will destroy Vitalik's little fee bubble and all will be well with the world

Attached: 1597289543923.png (500x700, 558.77K)

a product that doesn't exist will definitely kill Eth this time, for sure. Linkies need to learn their place.

you realize arbitrum makes vitaliks little script shitcoin viable again. good for eth, neutral for link

link node operators will run arbitrum and be compensated for the roll-up work
he doesnt know

Attached: 1574364306000.png (830x692, 962.02K)

I'm thinking once more and more dapps are built across different industries VRF will get plenty of calls

blog.chain.link/verifiable-random-functions-vrf-random-number-generation-rng-feature/
eprint.iacr.org/2017/099.pdf
You can read about chainlink VRF's and how they are implemented here.

Arbitrum is on mainnet today with their V2 coming out month, and an expected 10x growth in tps next year with v3

VRFs are not random and would be a function of centralization though you clown.

Again, unsurprising that a centralized shitcoin like link depends on centralized solutions to work.

Oh you didn't know...
Should we tell him?
He probably won't understand but let's do it anyway, what's the worst thing that can happen?

Programmatically call a randomization function is slightly biased, which is why you say "a random function is not actually 100% random".

Search around and you will find tons of resources on this subject. It's been a long known "issue thats not actually an issue".

This is part of the reason why you can find hundreds of "random generators that is fairer than native randomness"

dude are you chinese lmao lern2reed

Attached: 1580945374765.jpg (280x291, 19.2K)

>A verifiable random function is not random
Sure but it is indistinguishable from random unless you have the private key. Or have you cracked RSA cryptography? If true you basically have incomparable virtual power and can destroy all tech systems from Bitcoin to the Pentagon to your local bank. Why haven't you? Oh because you're just a mad nolinker that doesn't know what's going on in the space.

yes, which is bullish for node operators, not necessary the LINK token price

>He doesn't own 15 Linkpool tokens

> splitting hairs like a pendant
don't think your average cryptos investor will tell the difference

Attached: 1563153406427.gif (645x773, 40.51K)

At best it's just emitting a value based on some input associated with a contract depending on it. There is nothing inherently preventing a node or aggregate of nodes from using statistically passing PRF's with signed outputs (VRF).

Your qualms are answered in Appendix C of the NSEC5 paper that Ms GoldBerg put together

I'm just a private, pissing in OGs soup, SIR

Irrevocably btfo but intends to post claiming he's not

arbitrum next month and is on mainnet today? can you post sauce user?

Attached: seeyoufuddingretard.png (780x584, 49.48K)

The problem is technique. During smart con serger specifically made it known the smart contract approved methods of dice rolling.
I was devastated, I roll dice despite my slight disability (broke my wrist as a kid) and I was so upset to hear they didn’t make any room for non sanctioned techniques.
My form is normal to a laymen but to a seasoned pro or even worse, to their verifiers, I’m a disgrace.
I just wish they were as accommodating to me as they are to niggers.