LINK is still before the golden bull run

> LINK is still before the golden bull run
> Nolinkers are still priced out
> $ 1000 EOY is still fud

Go ahead goyim, buy the dip. It is the best thing you can do right now or you'll stay poor forever

Attached: 1599294351491.jpg (680x591, 392.68K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/kZLLsZVxypI
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

I aint buying shit, as you said im mega priced out. Link is never even going to $100 lmao why would I risk for a MAYBE 10x

>mfw i sold at $19-$20
>mfw it had the same pattern of all the other shitcoins
>mfw it will keep dumping with small recoveries from time to time
>mfw bagholders will hold till -99%

Attached: 1587327498453.jpg (300x577, 15.71K)

stay poor pajeet

"Heh.. s-stupid linkers.."

Attached: 20200916_134051.jpg (669x627, 50.66K)

Let's be real, link is going to go parabolic but not before sirgay and his team gets rid out of as many people as possible. They dont want normies holding LINK and I'm sure they didnt want Zig Forums autist to shill this since it was cents. Just check any exchange, its manipulated as fuck and the 500k dumps won't stop. This will continue dumping but its going to be free money on the long run, even if its just a x3 or x4.

i could rebuy my 10k for less then half of what i sold it for lmao
and yet i wont, because it's was just a bubble
you will be just like all the retards who didn't sold btc at 19k

You will be like every retard that sold his ETH at $12

link isn't eth, it's an erc20 token

Lmao,nobody wil b priced out soon when this pos just keeps dumping

>fudding link in 2020
just go back newfag. u had 3 years

>holding eth at 1,4k
>never selling
good luck fren, i have been there

Genuine question to any oldfags who rode eth in 2017, did you swing at all? I've seen people brag about how obvious this recent pump was for link and that a correction had to be coming, but how do you determine that (and don't give me bullshit answers like Portnoy or twitter psyops posing as moonshine boys)?
Example, eth went from 10 dollars to about 350 before its first correction. What did it correct to? 160. You could have looked at it at 80 dollars, said this is ridiculous, gotten out, and BEST case scenario, you could get back in with half your stack at 160, if you timed it perfectly.
This is why I'm sticking with the hold brainlet strategy, anyone that held large stacks of eth or btc for years is already fucking rich, if you think you picked a winner just ride it out.

i always swinged eth with around 50% of my stack it worked out very well untill 2018
i wish i sold everything then but i unironically though that there was a chance for eth to follow the same patter of bitcoin

What was the indicator for you that 20 had to be the top for link, and why didn't you get wrecked with eth in the initial pump?
Also if your eth swinging worked out well until 2018, and it was 50% of your stack, you should have been fine, cause worst case you cashed out 50% near the top which is better than most people did.

Sure if you time the tops and bottoms perfectly then you could make significantly more money faster. The problem is most people will fuck that process up. The only fool proof method to not fail is by not selling in a short time frame and only accumulate with the intent of holding 3-7 years.

Imagine buying BTC or ETH when it was under .50. If you missed the top on ETH you might be a little salty but in reality you would be still sitting on nearly a 700x in regards to BTC its beyond ridiculous. It sounds gay but time in the market>timing the market if you have successfully found an obvious long term winner. Don't get me wrong its worth the time studying to try and learn how to identify local tops and bottoms but in crypto things are blatantly manipulated and one wrong swing can ruin several successful ones.

Checked and that's been my thought process as well. I've seen people brag about selling the top of the recent link pump but nobody talks about how they sold when it pumped to 6 and never got back in, yet surely some had to do that. Probably a decent amount of those are the same people desperately spamming the board with fud now, because they fucked up and want to get back in at a good price.
I guess if you haven't actually researched link obsessively I could see someone preferring to dip in and out to try to make quick gains, but I'm comfy waiting my 3 to 7 years. I got in late (2019) so I'll see where we're at in 2022, maybe cash out a small percentage, and continue to hold a position (possibly rebuy if I time a swing perfectly).

>What was the indicator for you that 20 had to be the top for link
Well, we all know that all altcoins are influenced by btc movements, and since btc has almost always dumped in september i knew that we must be near the top
>why didn't you get wrecked with eth in the initial pump
because i sold in summer and bought back in autumn, both in 2016 and 2017
> you should have been fine
no because my original stack in late 2015 was small since i was underage and had to ask my dad to buy it and he didn't wanted to put thousands of dollars on "internet funny money"
in the end i earned enough to buy a house but not enough to be free from wagecukcing the rest of my life

>It sounds gay but time in the market>timing the market
that is true for btc and kinda for eth if you went in early on, but a very dangerous idea for most of the other altcoins and i think link is one of them

Based that is an excellent plan given what we know about the future outlook for LINK. If you have a lot going on in your life( career, family, hobbies, and just a vast of array of responsibilities in general) its the best plan that requires the least time investment and will still reward you handsomely

Sorry to hear that bro but it sounds like it still ended up amazingly well for you. I think you're underestimating link, maybe the fud has gotten to you, but your intuition's gotten you this far so you'll figure it out.

>ETH went from 10 - 350 before first correction
wrong, zoom in. ETH had plenty of drops on the way to glory, nothing goes up in a straight line. pic related.

Attached: ETHmarch2017.png (1080x1920, 207.93K)

the problem with these guys is that swinging works until it doesn't.

Just ask to the people who sold at 5$ and 10$

The mongoloids who sold at 5 are still seething

>but a very dangerous idea for most of the other altcoins and i think link is one of them

Then you haven't done the proper research. Chainlink is the next natural progression for blockchain and to succeed on an institutional level. Distributed ledgers and smart contracts can't complete over 80% of their use cases without decentralized oracle networks and LINK has solidified themselves as the premiere option. There is virtually no competition that is even close to them in every facet of the technology.

Fair point but it still doesn't answer how someone times their swings perfectly. Other poster did clarify he only traded long positions which makes sense, although swinging ETH from summer 2017 to fall still seems like a risky proposition when looking at the chart, if you sold during the June pump 50/50 chance you wouldn't have even been able to get back in with gains in the fall.

42 to 35 is not nearly as drastic and much different than 350 to 160. Perhaps he meant serious correction

Didn't eth go from $20 to $6 at one point?

i agree. if you swing you might as well just cash out and go to the casino.
good point, does the DAO hack count? went from $20 to $6.

At this point in time, who knows if link is bottoming before another run or if it's dumping down to nothing. At any rate, crypto aside, the best fiscal decision you can make is to EVER hold an debt whatsoever. We can't have an evolved Ubuntu society until debtors give up their irrational FOMO and greed.
youtu.be/kZLLsZVxypI

Attached: eth.png (1281x687, 51.54K)

Now that is a drastic correction. I'll have to look at the charts and see how much noise there was in between its first rise to triple digits lets say. I want to know if it did a 10x or even a 5x at any point without a 50% correction on the way up

In 2016 ETH went from $1 in January to $20 in July and then it corrected down to $7. It wasn't until March 2017 that it broke out and went crazy. If you look at Bitcoins big bull runs they come in 4 year cycles. Link in 2020 is doing exactly what ETH did in 2016.

And I guess it counts if the price fell the price fell. I guess you could argue had it not happened the correction might not have been as severe or not happened at all but it did, its just not something someone could have predicted and successfully swung as a result is all.

holy based

Attached: 1567501306531.jpg (1796x843, 202.23K)

Checked two little ducks in a row, based and correctpilled.

2016 ETH is very similar to 2020 Link. Taking into account BTC bull runs happened in 2013 and 2017 (4yr gap) let's hope Link has a 2021 similar to ETH's 2017.

lmao

I don't think Btc pumped because it had such and amazing and useful tech, the initial discovery was due to criminals using it as a currency and then normies pumping up the price based on the speculation that it would eventually become a global currency.
For most normies eth was just btc 2.0, most of them even on an institutional level didn't give a shit about it's tech.
So my issue is that even if link has some useful tech it doesn't matter, untill either crypto finally gets adopted on an institutional level which still seems very far away or may even not happen since institutions don't seem to care much about decentralization and both btc and eth can't scale for now anyway. The problem is the i don't think there will be enough normalffag hype to pump it more than what we already reached.