Why are top LINK holders adding right now?
See for yourself biz
Why are top LINK holders adding right now?
See for yourself biz
based
>wearing pants
Because we are going to $25 eom
based nopants poster
>the return is to great
Also anyone who thinks that Chainlink is going to sell the vast majority of their tokens is a brainlet.
>9 trillion dollar market cap in a 90 million supply
Mother of god... $1000 truly is fud.
9 trillions divided by 90 millions equals... 100 millions? That's the price of 1 single link token?
OP says LINK will be $1000, but doesn't an overly expensive LINK make LINKs unattractive to node operators? I believe in the technology but don't see how it can moon in that way.
No. 18 decimals
*nostalgia intensifies*
fuck this reminds me of the good old days. someone once responded to my same, brainlet question and now I have the honour of doing same. I know this has already been said but the answer you seek is: 1.000000000000000000
The OP post is retarded and was written by someone in 2018 or so that doesn’t understand anything about what Link does...larping as a whale
these guys are right the price of using a link node will likely be measured in dollars. The price of link will be relative. A well setup link contract will likely never even show the end user what the fuck chainlink even is, UNLESS of course that in itself is a selling point -- but the job request will still be relative to the dollar.
I know bro. I know.
this, companies wont spend that much on it. they can just make their own oracles. why would they pay all this money for it when they can just make their own oracles?
you literally cannot help yourself can you
>Why are top LINK holders adding right now?
Sunk cost fallacy.
I'm gay
> Deluded Linkies thinking that someone or something will pay 10$ to refresh some data, when you can have some pajeet doing it for less than a dollar. .
>Why are top LINK holders adding right now?
Delusional cultists will continue buying and never selling no matter how much it dumps. Eventually they will achieve their goal of holding all LINK in existence, but there will be nobody to sell it to and no jobs for their nodes
The top holders aren’t cultists you moron they’re companies or funds
Any legit Zig Forums user that lurked the required 2 years still replying to threads posted in the last hour should lurk more.
sage goes in all fields
BECAUSE. NO. OTHER. FUCKING. COMPANY. CAN TRUST. ANOTHER COMPANIE'S-
>much oracl ulul
IT IS SEPARATE FROM ANY ORGANIZATION. ANY PARTY. IT ALONE IS ITSELF. THE CHAINLINK NETWORK IS ANYBODY AND EVERYBODY THAT WANTS TO BE REWARDED FOR ACCURATE DATA, AND NOT TO BE PUNISHED FOR BAD. COMPANIES HAVE ALREADY ESTABLISHED BULLSHIT TO RE-LAY INFO TO AND FROM EACHOTHER. BUT IT'S SUS.
>IT'S SUS I SAY.
companies are cults of profit
I missed you
I know you know lol. I was replying to
Checked.
It's funny how LINK is legitimately the only project that matters and people still see it as a cryptocurrency project lumped with the rest.
what?
on the plus side I'll be a millionaire if link succeeds
on the downside it won't be until im in my 40s
its 100k you retard
>Why are top LINK holders adding right now?
source?
>The $20 LINK run wasn't ran by retail FOMO