Indeed, especially since they're already using solidity which should help speed up adoption.
Staking is working perfectly on day 1 and I can't wait to see the first dapps being built on Avalanche.
I think there might be some major announcements in the coming weeks.
Logan Richardson
Yeah it's shit. But in a years time, supply will be high enough - all those coins will be on the market and it should be pretty decentralized
Charles Baker
Waiting for that Coinbase listing!
Aaron Martin
Fuck no, mirror the staking reward, basically the team and foundation will own half of the entire supply Enjoy the permableeding, these turkroaches rushed the mainnet with dozens of shortcuts to ride the defi hype buzzword As soon as hype fades, this coin will be permadumped
Hunter Gomez
Thanks for your opinion trannies, it's not needed here. Go back to your scam coin threads, you missed out on the public sale and now you're surely priced out of AVAX.
Investor allocations unlock after 1 year, until then it will pump. Try and do a better job of understanding supply allocation and vesting schedules. Clown.
>rushed the mainnet they have been working for years before doing the ico. bear cope
Noah Reyes
We are all waiting for a lower price. There are a lot of tokens currently not in circulation. The current price is way too high.
Isaac Sanders
>"Avax is a fairly well known protocol in the U.S and it combines the best approaches of nakamoto and classical consensus into one package".
Idk about you guys, but I'm in.
Bentley Wright
>it combines the best approaches of nakamoto and classical consensus into one package nakamoto consensus was not about handing over cheap coins to venture capitals and keep half of the supply for the team. For fuck’s sake don’t even compare it
Zachary Cook
I don't think it was about 4 mining pools controlling over 50% of the network either.
This new consensus allows a lot more in the ways of decentralisation and still keeps performance.
The team have about 10% of the tokens
Jose Green
pooling is used to decrease the risk of getting zero rewards for too long pools don’t control how the network operates and miners cannot do much damage (they also have very little incentives to do that), they just mine new blocks and include tax with the highest fee thay have pay for hardware and electricity so they don’t just fuck around you are completely clueless avax is an oligarchic system where team/foundation (basically the same entity called with another name) owns most of the supply and will continue to get richer and richer because they will basically get the mirrored allocation for staking rewards
Colton Ortiz
So if they sold everything to retail you think that would make it fairer? What a terrible take.
Wow I feel dumber after reading that, you literally have no idea what you're even talking about you buffoon.
Great project looks solid. Probably a good idea to wait a couple months until price flatlines, like every other hyped project to come out recently, big or small.
Michael Myers
Classic BTC maxies seething Ethereum minted 72 million ETH from the start in 2015, that's 64% of current total supply, I'm sure it's a centralized shitcoin but Bitmain dominating ASIC production and Chinese mining pool aren't a problem. Keep screeching while Ethereum/ Avalanche bring your BTC into DeFi and make banks from it.
Hunter Morgan
So much disinfo. I'll try my best.
1) The foundation committed to burning/re-disturbing their staking rewards. So no, you shouldn't mirror the allocation.
Community & Development Endowment (1 year vesting)
Strategic Partners (4 years vesting)
Airdrop (4 years vesting)
3) Satoshi owns about 10% of Bitcoin's supply.
4) The team has been working on this project for at least 2 years and it had a functional tested network before the ICO, nothing was rushed.
5) Bitcoin mining pools do have great power. Remember Segwit2x? It was canceled only when the mining pools decided privately they won't mine at a loss for more than 12/24 hours. Imagine what would have happened if an enemy of Bitcoin decided to fund them. Before segwit2x, many exchanges said they will give the ticker to chain that has the most PoW. A true digital currency shouldn't rely on a cartel or hardware.
6) The public sale price is same as the private ($0.5). Only exception is the seed round ($0.33). So no, it's not a VC coin. Always DYOR. If you believed any of the disinfo above then Zig Forums will cost you a lot of money.
Carter Cook
I was wondering how a project with so little traction has so many new memes, and I realized they have a full-time corporate wage slave making them all.
None of this is organic, plus it is a VC coin and a Professor coin at the same time. Faggots.
Many people here still don't understand that Avalanche made the first and probably the last breakthrough in consensus since Nakamoto consensus.
100% of other coins are variations of proof-of-work or proof-of-stake. This is something new. Something that works today. Ethereum 2.0 won't be ready until a couple of years (according to Vitalik) and it's inferior to Avalanche.
James Perry
theres 100s of shitcoins better than ETH already, this is nothing impressive. See Harmony ONE, FTM, etc.
Hunter Richardson
The problem is not about if the project is good or not (it is very good), the problem is whether it is worth the investment at the current price.
Daniel Garcia
Nope. These coins are very centralized. Avalanche managed to be more decentralized than both Ethereum and Bitcoin while delivering a higher throughput and lower latency.
There's no comparison.
Oliver Hall
pretty much /thread avalajeets are being paid to shill this vc scam
Carter Mitchell
Thanks for writing this up user, hopefully it helps others make an informed decision.
Logan Hill
>Satoshi owns about 10% of Bitcoin's supply. No, satoshi doesn’t have 2 million btc, fake and gay And he learned them with proof of work, it was not a premined scam
Robert Carter
Personally, I believe it will be a top 3 coin, so I don't care about current fluctuation. It will eventually be >$100 no matter how long that takes.
Gavin Long
Bags filled. Ready for pump.
Jacob Campbell
>And he learned them with proof of work, it was not a premined scam
Difficulty was low, inflation was very high, and he and and few people knew about Bitcoin.
That's equivalent to a pre-mine or ICO team allocation.