What's your hot take on Bitcoin and the three forks?

Sry, meant hate craig, hate bsv

Roger is a cunt faggot too.

RV has done more for the crypto space than all the people you know and will ever meet for the rest of your life user

Craig is a fraud and BCH and BSV's block size increases don't make the blockchain scalable enough for true general adoption, and they increase the requirements on running a full node, leading to centralization issues.
Despite this, BTC is getting centralized in China anyways, and no one is using the lightning network (which would be scalable enough for general use, but requires too much technical knowledge for the average n*rmalfag to understand in the current state).
BTC will probably stay afloat as a store of value anyways riding on its first mover advantage and the unwavering autism of the bitcoin maxi.
I'm still much more fond of Monero (parallelization resistance, privacy and fungibility) and Ethereum (genuine use cases for crypto through smart contracts) compared to any of the bitcoin derived tokens.

Attached: 1595804326797.jpg (897x658, 32.66K)

BSV is real bitcoin sir. Craig is real Satoj sir. Vishnu on blockchain sir.

None of the forks matter. BTC will always hold value and is the only one worth accumulating for the long term. The sooner you get this the better off you will be. Always stack BTC with your alt gains after they moon.

Craig wins. It's already decided. We are just going through the motions now, but the outcome is the same.

Attached: play_to_win.jpg (1079x378, 31.83K)

>BTC
crippled 1mb chain which stifles adoption forcing high fees. Price will stay high for a couple more years till normies realize its unusable
>BCH
chinese fork of ppl who support illegal/unregulated stuff. Community will split in november, will slowly di off afterwards
>BSV
the original bitcoin protocol unleashed. Will keep attracting developers due to highest capacity and lowest fees, initially price will be suppressed because of people hating csw and not understanding tech, in ~5 years will be the dominant version since a bunch of killer apps will have been built on it

Attached: 1599787599872.jpg (1059x952, 116.76K)

That is someone's grandson

The person that has actually done the most for bitcoin is Pieter Wuille. Roger Ver doesn't do shit accept scam people.
Real cypherpunks write code

90% of transactions on bsv are op_return, which any sensible node will immediately prune as the chain grows, since these outputs are provably unspendable.
Bsvfags think they are building this giant immutable database, but in reality they are literally paying money to have their data thrown away. The ultimate cucks

How do you think new nodes synchronize with the network? Do you think the blockchain gets deleted when nodes prune their merkle trees?

Lightning is a meme and nodes propagate blocks. BSV scales, deal with it. Monero will have to deal with this as well. Let's hope they don't shit the bed and just let nodes scale instead of being faggots like BTC.

>Real cypherpunks write code
Cringe

>any sensible node
Show me a node doing this.

specialization will happen, storage is really cheap so services storing op return data will appear, MatterCloud for example already announced they will offer that as a service. Most company storing in op return also store it locally in their database, there bsv is seein mostly as a backup/timestamp/signing service.

While the first wave of apps was mostly op return, now that higher level languages on top of bitcoin script have been developed (see scrYpt) we will start seeing a wave of more smart contract applications similar to ethereum.
I think the minimum timeframe to look at is still 5 years, but even without looking at op return or scrypt applications, just the micro transaction application per sé is a big killer app. Btc won't be able to compete,eth can't compete either, but might have a chance if/when eth2.0 is released

Lol except ur right

ETH 2.0 is just PoS scammery. I also don't think they can get it to work anyway. 2.0 is ETHs lightning

Imagine thinking the mining industry is going to use their bandwidth and storage to serve up tons of data that isn't required for consensus. You are paying fees to store data that will be pruned and ignored. What's the point?

This isn't happening. You can't point to a single instance of it and even when your argument is excepted Bitcoin still works as an index. There are incentives to store the data as the other user explained and again even if for some reason literally ever node removes something (which again has never happened) the data can be backed up off chain and cryptographically proven using transactions as index.

I feel bad for you user. Scammed so hard