Is usury immoral?

Is usury immoral?

Attached: 6a00d8341bf67c53ef01539433f3ea970b-800wi.jpg (447x380, 32.83K)

Absolutely.

Attached: 1600459630306.png (483x513, 485.71K)

delete this anti-semitic post immediately

Yes, but so is defaulting on the loans that you agreed to.

In medieval times when Usury was illegal, banks made money by imposing massive late fees if you were slightly late in repaying debt.

Attached: 1574364306000.png (830x692, 962.02K)

Based, that system punishes people for not being competent human beings instead of not being financially minded robots

cute kitter
it introduces inefficiency into the system of capital so we are incentivized to prevent it

Is Israel a legitimate state?

Back then if you couldn't pay your debt banks just emptied everything you had and then sent you to debtor's prison where you work shit jobs until you can pay back the debt.

Attached: 1566056274788.png (929x1175, 119.12K)

No.

Based

Attached: 1578809001233.jpg (237x212, 9.6K)

Yes. Any and all interest is sinful

What is the incentive to make loans without interest?

Isn't that effectively the same as interest?

Not really. Interest is something you always get. A penalty is a penalty (you get it only if you fuck up).

Anyways, banks made a lot of money using either method.

To please the Lord and do right by your fellow man, simple as. Interest leads to corruption, greed and Mammon worship, the very bedrocks of judeo-capitalism

Without interest, loans wouldn't be made in the first place. It's not profitable.

Does it truly profit a man to sell his soul for silver?

The modern banking system allows the wrong kind of people to have too much power and influence in society. It used to be that if you wanted to be a part of the nobility and lords of a country, you needed to invent or make something that benefited society as a whole. Nowadays, any parasite that makes a decent trading bot can be wealthy.

What does this have to do with selling your soul?

The central banking system is awful, agreed.

This threads go me right in the gorillion.

>people should lend money to others, expose themselves to default risk, without renumeration
>muh joos
Civilization can't exist without some form of usury.
>but muh joos
You can also just have a king who drops by, fucks your wife and takes 1/3 of your harvest if you prefer that.

You fucking retarded? Kill yourself you dumb cunt
The Jewish Question is an obvious point of interest, especially as regards usury and finance in general; to deny this is to deny reality. Civilization can exist without usury - access to capital is based on trust. Even now, in our modern era, trust is imperative, which is why we have credit scores and financial history. What the fuck do you think usury is? You charge huge interest on loans to people you don't trust. Usury is a sin.
Regarding your sly comment on prima noctis and tithes, you clearly know fuck all about how life worked before Jewish finance. For the record, prima noctis was a myth and tithes were a tenth of your harvest, paid to the church or the local magistrate. In fact, in most non-church land, taxes were as little as

>muh sin
>muh idealized medieval life
Ok guy, have fun with all that cognitive dissonance, self hate and cope.
Your catholic utopia is just around.the corner I'm sure.

>This fucking retard owes so much money he'll never pay it back what should we do with him?
>ehh just send him to that shithole we found near the orient hopefully he dies
This is how aussies came to be

Let's just get rid of dajooz and we don't have to worry about that anymore.

yes

bump

According to the Bible? Yes.
According to Capitalism? No. Buyer beware and all that..