Cue cognitive dissonance in 3...2...1
Cue cognitive dissonance in 3...2...1
Dominic Clark
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
aei.org
aei.org
investopedia.com
thebalance.com
twitter.com
Gavin King
In the latter I can save for early retirement. In the former the state chooses how many years I must work.
Adam Parker
It's a question of decentralized wealth vs. a system where the wealth is centralized.
Michael Foster
respond to the fucking video. you cunt.
Zachary Lewis
>600 billionaires control the economy
Seems pretty centralized to me
Jeremiah Torres
In reality, both are forms of centralized wealth. The latter is just a slightly looser version.
Jaxon Brooks
it's almost like extremes are retarded and constant pull/push needs to occur to discover the optimal economics of a functioning society. whoa.
Julian Thompson
>early retirement
retirement is a spook. good job falling for the boomer meme though.
Christian Morgan
1 branch of the government was responsible for a loss of a considerable portion of US's GDP. 600 billionaires are more decentralized than a single fucking branch of government.
furthermore, in the economy, it's always a different set of 600 greedy capitalists. it's cyclic. A star rises and falls based on merit and value propositions alone, whereas in government we have career politicians.
fucking respond bitch.
Austin Parker
Is it? Is it really? FUcking jesus christ do I have to reiterate a fucking statistic.
Hudson Gutierrez
no. it really isn't. and the value statement of x amount of billionaires vs a government is entirely different.
Colton Johnson
Not everyone is so poor as to have retirement even out of reach of their mind.
Josiah Sanders
aei.org
aei.org
aei.org
JESUS FUCKING
Ethan Price
wow what a meeting of the minds we have here
Owen Reyes
retirement is a ponzi scheme. I'm sorry you're too retarded to recognize the reality.
Adrian Davis
CEO of spazzing
Bentley Edwards
Jaxon Cook
Lincoln Nguyen
1955 to 2017 was a wide span of time. what is your actual point and what value do I get dissolving a government and rebuilding A GOVERNMENT headed by x amount of billionaires? It's stil centralized and it's still a government, just one lead by some neo-nobility feudalistic retardation vs the semblance of choice and democracy.
Isaiah Miller
It's simple. The government serves a purpose, it offers a unique value proposition, just don't fucking take it to the extremes. Bad shit happens. They have a monopoly on war for fucks sakes.
The billionares are at each-others throats for a larger share of the market, to do this they need to please the populace which is why we get shit like the gillete ad. "A best a man can get". There will always be bad actors, but if the machine is broken into several hundred segments of power, and the ones that become corrupt lead short lives before a quick downfall, and it only affects that isolated segment, it's gucci. The government encompasses the population as a whole, it is very unique in this, and is valuable, just keep it reigned in.
Alexander Carter
Shouldn't the first one say "work and starve" ?
Ryder Jones
more delusion. American history already demonstrated confederacy doesn't work (Articles of Confederation) and generally Federalist ideals won out all the way up to the tipping point of a supreme federal government. No one wants a "decentralized governance" where retards can do retarded things in their bordered corners and your feudalism was provably destroyed for how anti-freedom and moronic it was. You're living in the delusional past and have missed the great push and pull of ideas that have gotten us to 2020. seek help you psycho retard. You're whatever amount of billionaire fag shit neo-nobility is a dead end idea.
Ryan Reed
Samuel Perez
Based
Hunter Walker
We're talking finances. MONEY. Not governance. I don't give a fuck about policies. I don't give a fuck about laws. I CARE ABOUT SHIT LIKE 2.3 TRILLION DOLLARS CAN SIMPLY GO MISSING and all anyone can do is light up a cigarette and crack a beer. You got rugpulled by the centralized system that unites all of us together, because it's bad with money. If you have 600 people where 90% of them are good with money and 10% are bad, this is a better ratio than 100% of the system being terrible with money. Fucking. Refute this.
Kayden Myers
investopedia.com
thebalance.com
It isn't like the government can accumulate debt for free. More and more of the government's budget is being allocated to paying the interest in the 20 trillion in debt. How is this stable.?
Juan Lopez
Funny enough, free market capitalism gave us the term starvation wages.
Dominic Hernandez
Obviously, if wage workers in Russia, from 1917 to 1991, would have been exploited to the death by republican liberal Capitalism, like they were in England by the end of the 19th century, it would have been better. R-right?
Never underestimate that if it has a different name (USSR vs "democracy"), different uniforms, it is fundamentally different. The reality of the fundamental social relationships don't matter. What matters really is always the appearances.
Lucas Reed
>1 branch of the government was responsible for a loss of a considerable portion of US's GDP. 600 billionaires are more decentralized than a single fucking branch of government.
wow you are retarded. you think those billionaires are divided ideologically or something? looool
Wyatt Hernandez
>Pointing out where a term comes from
wow you got him!
Gavin Baker
wow, good 1 fellow TPUSA patriot xD
Dominic Anderson
>The billionares are at each-others throats for a larger share of the market,
you are delusional dude.
it's all a big club, and you ain't in it.
Aaron Thompson
When RealCommunism™ is implemented, everything in the economy will be controlled and owned by a central party and state, and you ain't in it. In Capitalism, the big boy club owns 70% of the world's wealth. In Communism it will be 100%.
Please tell me you're not an anarco-communist..
Brody Barnes
ftfy
Jordan Powell
>and you ain't in it.
That wouldn't be RealCommunism™, then, would it?