It's not a matter of if, just when. You guys have no idea how early you are...

It's not a matter of if, just when. You guys have no idea how early you are. I'll be surprised if even 10% of you actually make it to see the real rise, though.

Attached: 4gez36hf.jpg (1920x1080, 1.85M)

pretty accurate picture for how it feels to hold chainlink

you burnt your own field

You're genuinely suggesting it's not valued out. 35% of it is held by one wallet. Sergey would be the richest person in the entire world in these scenarios.

1k eo2030 confirmed.

I'm HOMOSEXUAL and I hold chaiNLINK

>early

It had its moment in the sun and there is basically no journalism or any normie awareness anymore. It's literally over until that fat faggot actually releases real working features which he never will. You're delusional.

More people that bought LINK

People new to Zig Forums: Yes, Chainlink seems like a promising project. Yes, it seems like the team is full of geniuses. Loads of partnerships. The world is going to run on LINK! Right?
Before you buy, let me tell you a story.
I was visiting San Francisco to see one of my friends. We went to a strip club, and while I was there I saw Sergey, surrounded by women. He was throwing tons of money at them, but not just bills. It was stacks upon stacks of $10,000, sealed up with white paper bands like he had just come straight from a bank.
I went up to him and congratulated him on the success of Chainlink as of late (this was about two months ago), and he started laughing. He took a hefty swig from a bottle of Dom Perignon and said, "Yeah? You think I care, stinky?"
Confused, I asked what he meant, and said that he had obviously put a lot of work into LINK and he should be proud.
"Fundamentally, I don't give two fucks about Chainlink, kid."
He was about to say something else but one of the strippers tapped him on the shoulder. Sergey pulled out from his pocket the biggest ziplock bag full of cocaine I've ever seen in my life. It looked like one of those gallon bags, almost bulging at the seams. The stripper ran off into a back room with it.
He then pulled out a Zippo lighter.
"You wanna know what I think about Chainlink?"
He snapped his fingers and a stripper handed him a bottle of Hennessy. He then pulled about 20 stacks of bills from a duffel bag, threw them on the floor, poured cognac all over them. He flicked his Zippo and dropped it onto the pile. Almost instantly the whole stack caught.
I stared at him, speechless.
"It's called a 'PUMP and DUMP,' kid."
He laughed as he watched the pile burn before losing interest and going into a back room with his entourage of strippers following carrying duffel bags full of what I assume was money and coke.
This is the man you are supporting by buying LINK.

This is a gay copypasta. No newfag should believe this shit!

This. All the normalfags will get shaken out by 50% corrections along the way, like we have just seen.

We know. The thing is, he’s already loaded. Even if he isn’t Satoshi, he was cloud mining bitcoin from the very beginning and has obviously ridden both ethereum and yield farming.

there hasn't been any new fag on here for a long time

I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. Zig Forums hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

there was a brief influx during the pump to $20 then the yield farming shitshow, but they're all gone again.

Ye ye ye 1000 eoy we get it.
EOY 2035 because we’re soooo yearly.

Attached: F1461519-011B-442E-9CDD-0716EEAA5427.jpg (160x220, 7.37K)

I know this is just bull shit but even if it weren’t: if Chainlink goes to $350, like ethereum is at now, I’ll have nearly 18 million dollars.

All of the OGs are just holding and waiting. As a nulinker I must bear the shame of wasting my life posting on Zig Forums instead of trying to get rich. Now I have only a few linkies but they are mine and I shall buy the dip.

If you get Fudded out of your links you are a fool. I wouldn’t even sell if it crashed to .01

Attached: 4C8AA2D0-4671-48B9-B801-9EA1C6AEF95C.png (600x600, 170.43K)

they are still here, you see lots of XRP threads

God I'm so excited for you guys

I have a PhD in crypto economics and mathematics. Crypto incentives in Chainlink are a legitimate concern. I saw Ari Juels speak at a conference recently where he mentioned tokens and asked him about the token economics of a node staking system like the Chainlink network is planning to use. The problem is that node operator incentives are fuzzy at best and not even figured out fully by the team (see the gitter for Steve stuttering about this). When I brought it up to Ari Juels, I told him that in the way the network is expected to be used, the fees payable to node operators would actually decline as requests become more ubiquitous because as the network grows it becomes cheaper to use. This makes sense if you took a few advanced cryptoeconomics courses. Ari admitted that it was a great question but that they were "actively pursuing research in that area." I sold my LINK immediately after that and saw a significant dump on the binance charts. It's pretty clear these guys are pulling you along making you think they're doing something revolutionary when the incentives aren't even fully determined yet.

Too true, it's why they never moved the stock market to those clicking clack number counting wires and metal plates.

i dont understand these threads
like, isnt the entirety of crypto considered in a bullrun rn?
it's super likely we get a 2017 level pump again
wtf is special with chainlink then? literally every pajeet and their grandma is going to make it

Please don't pump it yet.

Nothing
Just OG stinkers looking to dump their bags on newfags.

thats if sergey stops selling links

you’re good user it won’t ever pump again

You are very smart user

you're being sarcastic, but actually 2030.

So you're telling me this project has confirmed ties to the banking cartel (Iso 20022 compliant, just in time for the Psd2 directive), the cream of the crop of global legal firms and institutions as well as some of the biggest tech companies in the blockchain space focused on the soon to be mass adopted enterprise level smart contracts such as consensys, Microsoft, IBM, docusign, Intel and Digital Asset and that the solution to the oracle problem which it is aiming to solve is essentially the God protocol as described by the creator of the smart contract concept himself, ie one of the main pillars of the fourth industrial revolution and the backbone of the future blockchain infrastructure (10% of global GDP in less than 10 years) that will allow massive automation of post trade processing, thus saving all the biggest markets such as derivatives, logistics and insurance possibly trillions in saving, AND its the only project of its kind due to its blockchain agnostic and decentralized nature and has the first mover advantage, but despite all these confirmed facts it's being largely ignored by the crypto community, although it has gone up from 120 to 12 ranking in a bear market with no marketing just in a couple of months, simply because a dozens of dedicated autistic neets down vote every possible clue about it on reddit and ACTIVELY fud their own investment instead of shilling it, because they're the only ones who realized this revolutionary project would basically replace all the lawyers with neet nodes where 1 link needs to be worth at least 5k usd in order to be sufficient collateral for the quadrillion derivatives market, the same neets who first called btc and eth when no one was taking crypto seriously and have harnessed the power of weaponized autism and meme magick to put Trump in the white house? Do you realize how delusional and insane that sounds? Personally I'm all in.

So you’re saying it’s xrp 2.0 and we bleed down to $0.16 from here????? Wow personalee im all in!!!!!!!!

Kek I remember when I first read this I eas like holy shit. Too bad it was all fake

Checked and basedpilled

>1 post by this ID
Every time.