Core + nyan finance?

Is it happening?

Attached: IMG_20201005_120019_306.jpg (709x608, 75.57K)

if so I dump my core immediately!

Dude...he just joined their tg.

I am also bullish on nyan when I figured out what nyan is. Arrogant shills are bad at it. You just need two words: decentralized whale

took u long enough slow fag

sta is also said to be a hedge fund and it's shit, hedge funds all over the place, and you still say hedge fund. Retards.
Also it's not core dev tg, it's coyote tg. Fake and gay

Imagine comparing sta to nyan. Kek.

I'd like nyan more if their marketing was better. It seems all they do is try and link themselves to whatever the latest fad is. There is no creativity. I like the idea of this project but now they've admitted that the original idea doesn't work I can't really see the point of it.

What you just wrote isn't an outward piece of information from you to the rest of crypto. It's a demonstration of your fucking ignorance. Nyan have not admitted the idea doesn't work you fucking idiot, they've adopted a new liquidity mechanism. How are you anons so fucking tiny brained?

Hahaha, so you're voting to change the entire token structure because the current token structure is working? Is that your position? Seriously? Do you even understand what you're even voting for? You're suffering from cognitive dissonance, that's why you're so angry. I see why everyone keeps calling you gay.

I don't really see the issue, it isn't changing the structure of the token, but liquidity is still a massive problem and this will fix it.

Again you obviously don't understand what you're talking about. The liquidity mechanism is being adopted. Explain to me the core liquidity mechanism? Why might any crypto projects be interested in adopting the mechanism?

It changes everything. Nyan holders no longer get a share of profits and can't mint nip unless they match their investment in eth. If they do match their investment in eth then they are life locked. It is a completely different structure and the dev team, to their credit admit it.

Do you understand the difference between what's good for the protocol and what's good for the holders?

Obviously never worked in the start up space. Think of this like an equity dilution. Would you rather sell your oranges to the local village or open up your orange selling business to the entire global market?

Every project would be absolutely blessed to be associated with CORE - volume and liquidity in core are off the charts!

We should charge people 0.2 Nip to voice an opinion as I'm so tired of this shit

It wouldn't make much difference to me if I'd signed away my rights to share the profits?

Maybe, lets see if it lasts?

Look when you get it you should come back here and we can have a proper discussion. Right now you're shouting because you're scared and don't understand the proposal. Go back and try and understand what the initial liquidity problem was and then come back here and see if you can work out why the proposed solution is something sensible that has been overwhelmingly voted for in favour by the Nyan holders you claim are getting fucked over. No need to reply to this message with your uninformed takes until you have done the above suggestion.

I'd support that. Especially in the telegram/discord. 1 nip per post.

What percentage of people voted?

Crypto badly needs Elon to release these brain boosting chips

Everyone is within their right to vote. Participation issues are nothing related to crypto governance. They are a common feature of most democratic governance systems.

Answer the question. You're quick to insult but by backing this proposal you're tacitly admitting you bought a pup in first place. You're not nearly as clever as you think.

What is your question? You know if you can't see the problem, then your first thought should be to try and see the problem before you shout at people who see the problem. The Nyan community had to go through this process before they listened to members who were pointing the problem out.

Agreed. If they had listened to skynomia they could have saved face. The dev isn't big brained at all, he couldn't even see the problem to start and the sycophantic nature of the community isn't helping

It's not reasonable to expect a community to change course just because of 1 persons views. They ended up following his lead and that is encouraging. People like you expecting things to happen instantly and / or running your mouth in public when uninformed are the problem. Now tell me what was your question and I will answer

Nik from admin called him a "fucking dog" when he raised the liquidity issue. Accused him of fudding. Now nyan is in crisis and looks ridiculous.

>Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people.

What was your question user?

What percentage of people voted?

Publically available information shall never be spoonfed lest we strive to create a dependent citizen body.

LOL, I'd say that if less than 7% voted. Vote was pretty quick too huh?