>kleros
>consensus of independent thought in an immutable digital ledger, incentivesed via game theory crypto-economics
>current applications include a result based betting site and a language translation freelance application
>Kleros jurors vote on the definition of words, sentences, phrases, or terms which can be made compositable into an alternative structure to legalese for contracts involving subjective human interpretation or independent thought consensus.
>Kanye West is complaining about shitty bloated legacy business agreements using courts of law are on Twitter
>Anons don't see the opportunity to partake in community driven consensus and opt-in alternative rule-books for the execution conditions of their smart contracts.
If I digitized my employement contract, and added a clause to permit me an extra week of paid time off in the event of a family tragedy, my employer would likely only agree on the terms that the funds at least go to an escrow service (haha) so there's opportunity for claim dispute to combat abuse. If I was choosing which escrow and dispute resolution service I wanted to use for my contract would I choose:
1) old and expensive lawyers that are likely friend with my boomer employer, or
2) a group of independent anonymous peers (verified to be my american peers thanks to a mix of LINKs CanDID and Kleros own PoH),
I'm going to bet on the anonymous peers to say my uncle dying does qualify as a tragic event in terms of my contract, and the tamper proof digital agreement will continue to function as designed from deployment, only relying or calling a session of Kleros "court" (which is really just a tool to verify humans agreed to a certain degree about a certain topic at a certain time) when the application or service, such as my employement contract, needs to perform an action in response to complex and inherently human question. I only have 5k. I want more.
