Gay Nyan

Schizo user wins..............the nyan proles finally understand what was being attempted.............they're shouting down BLACKEDZERO.com in the TG as we speak..........original holder vindicated...............liquidity problem still remains though.............very gay

Attached: nyan.jpg (299x168, 8.59K)

I thought the vote to switch to the core style lp was only advisory anyway? Did they ever have the actual vote or was that a lie?

...you need to go away...

There was no second vote...........these people lie..........BLACKEDZERO.com and his fluffer NIK KIM are the glibbest of falsifiers...............thery're also very gay

why?............cos i was proved right?..........As always?..........Ur gay btw

Tbf he's probably the most accurate source of info on nyan. The devs just shift the goal posts every 5 minutes ngl I'm kinda glad someone tells the truth for once

schizo never lies...........unlike gay nyan

You’re a retard if you follow that one. The most accurate source of info is whats actually happening. This schizo is nonsense

Thing is though what's actually happening is exactly what he said was going to happen on his thread last week. He said they'd spring the eth trap on holders and he said they were lying about the advisory vote. He's been proven right on both counts. He also told about the private group, I asked the dev outright and he denied it to me then three days later he apologises for posting the announcements in the private group by accident. I agree it's a sad state of affairs that the schizo narrator is more honest then the devs but it is true unfortunately.

Been away for a while... why exactly does it look like theres a bunch of free inflationary handouts for every token in the ecosystem?

Because that's all they could come up with apparently. That's and buying nyan with the funds money because it's undervalued. Becoming a bit farcical really.

Based on my reading back through the chat logs that sounds like a stupid comment desu.
Looks like the nyan bonuses were to offset losses for liquidity providers?
Looks like BZ backed down on the proposal straight away.
Not sure where this hysterical reaction is coming

In what way was my comment hysterical?

"thats all they could come up with apparently"
"becoming a bit farcical really"
That's 66% of your comment

I'm glad we've established you can count. Again though, which bit of that is hysterical? Also, which bit of that isn't true?

What exactly does "thats all they could come up with" mean though? It didn't even attempt to answer my question. It was just a throwaway emotional comment, like the farcical bit. I'm sure there are solid criticisms which I expect the schizo to outline in his own unique way but otherwise...

From what I can gather BZ has offered to help out members of the community that have supported the project in its early days - through the LP bonus. And has now suggested an idea which got shot down so he backed down on it immediately. Aren't we meant to be looking for co-operation amongst the community. Is this not it? Or is it the farcical result of not coming up with much? Ball is in your court to make a case I'm an evergreen pessimist.

It means that they're unable to solve the liquidity problem, that is intrinsic to the token structure, by using market forces. Therefore the best solution they could come up with is attempt to inflate the tokens and shift value from one set of holders to another. The farcical bit is just my opinion of the optics of the situation. I really don't think it's particularly emotional language, I'm surprised you'd take it that way. Unless of course you're operating in bad faith?

Out of interest, Why do you think they lied about the previous vote being advisory?

They lied for the good of the protocol................they will always lie for good of the protocol............whats good for the holders is not good for the protocol...........crust doesn't get this............he's gay

Ah right I see well I apologise for labeling you hysterical.
Are we certain that the changes don't solve the liquidity problem?

I guess its a game of definitions. From my memory it was never "officially" advisory, just some complained at the rashness of putting the decision to vote straight away?
To me this raises more interesting questions about governance rather than being a direct indictment of incompetence.
Reminiscent of the Brexit vote if you're away of how that all played out

Sorry just rereading your comment and i don't think this is accurate at all:
"Therefore the best solution they could come up with is attempt to inflate the tokens and shift value from one set of holders to another"

The 2 things are not related to the best of my knowledge. Schizo to confirm please. I believe what I said about compensating liquidity providers is the reason for the bonuses and they are in no way related to the v2 tokenomics?

Here's a picture of the dev saying its advisory.

Attached: IMG_20201012_185738.jpg (2976x3968, 2.42M)

Scorpz isn't BZ though.
Either way, I think it's fair to criticise these things but only in the sense of "here i is something the project can change in future" rather than the more sinister "omg u lied to us wtf man".
What would you vote for if there was a final vote and why?

bonuses are a red herring............no one cares.............liquidity issue cant be solved without locking eth..............nip still worthless..............polka bridge a gay meme for now...............50$ nyan likely

Scorpz is a dev though correct? He's listed as such on discord.

Tell me where the nyan hurt you.

sir........this is a gay nyan appreciation thread

can you confirm that the bonuses are just a rebate for LPs and then we can move on from it because its really inconsequential to me.
People can start locking liquidity once the new tokenomics launch right? the only difference it seems was that BZs proposal was to have a LGE which would require essentially resetting Nyan holders (but giving them first choice on providing liquidity). The decision to swap tokens before locking them just means there is no option to do a LGE?

whats wong cats got youw towngue?

*your

From my knowledge he just does the front end. If it was a company I don't think he would traditionally be a decision maker whereas someone like BZ would be the CTO.

I swear to god, anyone who uses a lelouch avatar always turns out to be a giant fucking faggot, and not in the homo way. How does it keep happening? It can't be the same person all over the internet.

I don't see how creating aa secondary lp market helps the liquidity though? It just means people will trade the existing liquidity all while unlocked nyan is devalued as it becomes merely a speculative asset. Its a sticking plaster at best.

The androgyny appeals to a certain psychology.........you are astute

He is a dev though, correct? BZ would be cto, coo, cfo, ceo etc in a proper company but this isn't a proper company. It's a centralised crypto project ie one entity has the admin keys

your voice is appalling and you have nothing to say

Well in the case of Nyan the liquidity is the fund (- already held assets). So locking the Nyan/Nip/Dnyan liquidity creates a floor for the fund whilst liquidity in the secondary market can do whatever it desires without causing the available fund to be volatile and affected by large price action

lol..........very gay dude

This is my point though. You're holding up a screenshot of a throwaway comment by a junior dev (no offence if he's not, just for illustrative purposes).
This is why I'm saying it raises more interesting governance questions. There should definitely be a clearer process in place, but of course all this stuff needs to be built and we're talking about a project that is barely 6 weeks old.

What's the value if the already held assets minus the value of the fund owned nyan?

to take that further - nothing official should ever be communicated in telegram, everything said there should be taken with a grain of salt. There should and hopefully will be a proper platform for managing these sort of issues. There are plenty of projects that have solid governance UIs (have a look at the YFL one). I wonder if there is an off the shelf solution that could be quickly implemented.

Not following what you're saying there sorry.
With locked Nip there would be a hyopthetical price floor. Therefore the Nip liquidity pool doesn't collapse when moving in and out of markets.
Schizo should be weighing in on this though instead of flirting with that red id

I agree with that. The way the supposed advisory vote was communicated was 'farcical' too. BZ needs to code, someone else needs to take over the other parts of the project imo

Schizo just wants nyan to talk............properly.........i quite like you two

I'm asking what the price floor is and how it helps incentivize nip? I get it with locked eth but with single staked nyan I don't?

Sorry don't think we're on the same page here. Can you reformulate your question?