I am an Ethereum maximalist. Come at me fags. Why should I not be one?
I am an Ethereum maximalist. Come at me fags. Why should I not be one?
Other urls found in this thread:
1) L1 space super congested and a many horse race.
2) Fat protocol theory not necessarily true as the oracle L2 could actually perform the vast majority of the work with ETH value representing only the transactional cost of settlement
Nothing wrong with that. Some people are ok with losing money or at best being stagnant. They get sexual gratification from making bad financial decisions. Whatever floats ya boat :^)
Nothing else beats or will replace ETH
I hold LINK too but I bet you have no gains
this projects bad
already priced in
Ethereum maximalism is obviously going to win, not only against BTC maximalism but also multi-chain anti-maximalism.
However the gains are to be made foremostly on projects that have no parallel to traditional finance, as that is where the most value will be created. Oracles/APIs aren't new, lending isn't new, overcollateralized loans aren't new, etc.
However, Synthetic assets as they are presented on ETH are entirely new.
I won't spoonfeed which projects are worthwhile, but the next wave of millionaires will be minted from synthetic asset platforms.
Give me some crumbs, your ideas intrigue me.
same desu
thinking about turning my remaining btc into eth
he's going to sell you DMG or some other crap
I can't spoonfeed you. Synthetix is a good starting point--the project I'm referring to has a tiny market cap and is backed by Binance, Alameda, big VC names.
I would post it but I am genuinely afraid of others buying in before I'm happy with my position size.
Last time I became an eth maximalist eth dipped hard and I lost a lot of money. I never disrespected daddy bitcoin again after that
>Why should I not be one?
For the moment, because ETH is pure spaghetti code congested garbage like stated. But 2.0 should (hopefully) fix a lot of these issues.
Why didn't you hold?
Because their chain is extremely congested? Because AVAX and Radix is gonna dominate it?
So many reasons
Literal who?
You can't even run a node why do you trust the network enough to put all your shekels in it?
your smart contracts are actually dumb. they can only execute based off data on the chain. they would be smart contracts if they could execute based on data off chain. plus, your inability to scale has slowed and stalled many other legit projects. good job!
>Nothing else beats or will replace ETH
rgb-org.github.io
^eliminates ETH's entire use case and nestles it into the lightning network using bitcoin.
ETH shits on all the cypherpunks who built this space.
They're unironic pedophile scammers.
Imagine not having 32 ETH
I deleted my shit on ETH folder, but there's A LOT of bad stuff surrounding the project.
Unironic communists writing pedophilia blogs promising cryptographic solutions that the best guys in the space couldn't do.
They're not from the cypherpunk roots like bitcoin.
It's queer scammer bullshit look at the people involved.
Ok boomer
I trust the guys who basically designed the internet, encryption, TOR, and a bunch of other stuff over weird pedo apologists handwaving "world computer" you can't even sync a node with.
your doing it right
bitcoin and ripple and chainlink maximalists are the ones that are retarded as heck
agree friend
Do you think uma will hold a place in crypto synthetics 2 or 3 years from now
no
And rightly so.
t. Have ~70% of my networth in eth
based