Associated Press:

so sick of this constant retard braying on Zig Forums that chainlink doesn't pump on every little bit of news. it presumes that millions of people with hundreds of millions of dollars are following ALL crypto news and throwing money at whatever is announced. It NEVER works that way.

why have a year long accumulation for a x4 though

>Associated Press is using Chainlink to record voting results
>"it's not news at all"
That's a big yikes from me dawg

>it's weird they're even using link for a single data point like that
Confirmed for absolutely clueless about Chainlink.

Attached: 8685546432164.png (637x921, 1.22M)

>Because its not news at all. No votes are counted on blockchain
They will in the future though

The thing that will drive price increase is network usage. One job (counting votes) isn't enough to facilitate this.
Everyone knows this now.

>arbitrum
>tsigs
>staking
>v 1.0
>20000 nodes

There's your yardstick. This isn't going to be about adoption, either you use this system or you cease to exist as a business. 1k really is fud.

If you get massive news like this, followed by a huge dump, that indicates something is seriously wrong. Whether it's manipulation or whatever.

Sure, doesn't change the fact that's this isn't really news of any note.

You just plainly don't know what you're talking about.

Price is always determined at the exchange, always.
Whether it's gold, stonks, crypto, ...

>You just plainly don't know what you're talking about.
Says the faggot who thinks Chainlink is supposed to be a decentralized network of sources.

>Associated Press is using Chainlink to record voting results
>"this isn't really news of any note"

Attached: P1EGg6U.jpg (720x706, 63.28K)

In part yes it does depend on that but more pertinently here this is just election result being put onto the blockchain, nothing about votes, electoral integrity, it's as meaningful as a football match result being fed. I don't even need to make the case for it being trivial as the market's doing it for me.

Yikes a double reply.

Clearly thirsty for attention so I won't give you anymore.

>so what if Associated Press is using Chainlink; it's only to record voting results, nothing special

Attached: 1580207162233.jpg (1080x1020, 130.98K)

Those are additional features, Chainlink is fundamentally a network of oracles, which are functional.

a year? try 3 years
4x? where u pull these numbers from? ur ass?

If u are confident that a project like link will succeed why not accumulate for a year? why not accumulate as much as u can as long as u can? the thing is that link is very very obvious for some of us. its basically guaranteed to succeed. and you are asking why accumulate.

Reddit kill yourself.

I've been all in link since -17 but I don't see this as any huge news either, maybe im missing something I just bought link because of the memes

If you think prices instantly follow every little piece of news you're a fucking retard. Where would that money be coming from? Who is sitting on the sidelines with a fat stack of fiat who would only buy LINK after this news comes out?

>I've been all in link since -17 but I don't see AP using Chainlink to record voting results as any huge news either

>AP using Chainlink to record voting results is just a little piece of news

Attached: 1582057981154.jpg (1008x1008, 165.29K)

>Sell the news
Not really. Might be delayed pricing in like with korea/china.

>sell the news
What was the rumor?

This kek its Zig Forums's 3rd call. Btc eth and now link. Unbelievable posting with you whackos is going to have been a wiser decision in the long run than going to school but thats clown world.

Do you think its just a delayed pump then?