Stakenet XSN

Daily stakenet thread. Fuck fudders, fuck cz, fuck scam coins and fuck cexs.

Attached: 4p.png (490x1337, 590.12K)

Other urls found in this thread:

twitter.com/SergeyNazarov/status/1314347295966543872
youtube.com/watch?v=8pLU6bUFoKY
pastebin.com/jiMdEAN8
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

I know nothing about stakenet, but can you explain why you would need it to convert between different programming languages if all of them end up as byte code or binary?

Blocknet

Attached: jannies_man.png (604x1138, 983.83K)

Friendly reminder that stakeholders are now exclusively posting in official /XSN/ generals

$1 eoy

Attached: 5283537603716869648.jpg (1024x576, 127.75K)

Chainlink nodes and DECO + wrapping make it obsolete.

I hate people defiling this graphic with their shitcoins as the ‘fourth’ one. But every time they do it solidifies the reality that link is an essential part of crypto.

Attached: 0670133E-4A84-4CBF-8E09-8B46145EA0B9.png (487x1265, 188.61K)

They stole our graphic sir

how would that facilitate instant, cheap, private, interchain trading? dont need a technical answer. just come and boil it down for us all

>Your p2p interchain trading platform is doing a particular use case of what Chainlink allows in an inefficient and less scalable and secure way.

no, it isn't. i already asked you to explain how chainlink will fascilitate p2p interchain trading of real blockchain assets and you have failed to deliver. instead you referred me to a post by sergey which i would guess you hardly understand yourself.

you are a chainlink enthusiast who is in so deep you cant see the forest through the trees. i would not be surprised if you are a late chainlink investor who needs to rationalise why its the greatest investment of all time every time another opportunity comes along. there have been so many linkmarines on biz of late months who have no idea what they are talking about. they are just speculators.

although they are connected, one thing is not like the other.

Explain me like I'm a retard

Hi Rajeesh.
It's nice to see you learned to copy and paste what looks like an argument.
But while I posted a very complete tweet from Sergey linking to 3 full articles explaining everything in detail, you not only failed to read them, but didn't show any argument from your side proving your inability to think rationally.

i can assure you i didnt copy and paste anything, and typed it rather quickly.

once agin, for i shall not engage in inane discourse with you once more,

explain how chainlink will facilitate instant, cheap, private, interchain p2p trading of blockchain assets

>Explain me like I'm a retard
this is retard proof

pastebin.com/jiMdEAN8

Looks like XSN fuders are now going down the 'chainlink already does this' route. Probably their best bet desu, considering no one on Zig Forums even understands what LINK does

Ok so that's yet another decentralised exchange project, what make you think it's not a scam like most cryptos are and that it will beat all the competition?

you clearly didnt read it because it addresses the two questions you just asked. you can download the beta wallet and try the tech for yourself

im so fucking sick and tired of dealing with the lazy niggers on here who cant do 10 minutes of their own research

bla bla bla, you seems like a standard shill dude I don't trust you nor your project

See

Not only is Vitalik implicitly bullish on Stakenet because he calls for trust-less inter-chain swaps, he is also a huge proponent of layer 2 as a scaling solution for Ethereum, which is the other massive pillar of Stakenet's first native application, the Stakenet DEX.

Attached: 1601677988942.jpg (1080x1350, 185.59K)

I'm sorry but citing arguments is not the same as citing sources. If you can't even make your own argument and cannot explain other peoples' its a huge red flag that you do not really understand what you are talking about.