Quant or Link?

Which one will make me rich?

Attached: 1602278889121.jpg (469x452, 39.38K)

haircomb token

Ghost

It's too late to buy link, I wish I had, but I didn't want to trust my money to a Zig Forums meme.

Nano

Quant without a doubt

It has to be Quant.
It will take a 30x before QNT matches LINK market cap.

Is link not fundamentally more sound tho?

Link

Absolutely not.
Quant is a blockchain operating system. They have hundreds of banks and a dozen central banks using their platform.
Look into MIT and ODAP - they are basically rearchitecting the internet.
Chainlink has nothing like this.

if you have to ask, you will not make it

>rearchitecting the internet
>definitely a good investment, bro. everyone is gonna move onto the QNT internet soon

What’s with the giga assburn cope? You do realize qnt needs link, right?

both but more quant

Isn't the sensible answer a bit of both? Link has mooned hard already so its doubtful its going to see any more insane explosive growth, at least for a few years.

QNT has more room for growth, but the truth is it could just be another shit project that never gets adopted, like ripple. There is no way to KNOW.

Sorry, anons. You’re ngmi.
It’s ok though. Just means Quantfags can buy more QNT.

When the best fud against qnt is that it could just end up like xrp, the current #3 coin and formerly 140bn cap.

Pretty much a chad portfolio is 50-50 LInk-QNT.
To start off, though, you should all-in QNT until they match market caps. After that, regular portfolio rebalancing makes sense.

RLC

>muh market cap meme
I saw hundreds of retards like you that claimed link already mooned when it reached 4 bucks>It’s ok though. Just means Quantfags can buy more QNT.
Kek knock yourself out.

LINK is, well, a scam, so it just depends on if they can keep convincing people they aren't or more people do their own research and figure it out and sell.

Attached: 1518054808842.jpg (640x611, 52.67K)

I mean, the banks who control like 90%+ of our money already have

Doesn't mean it will translate to significant token value though even if the tokens are used for the gateway meme and licenses used only by a relatively small number of entities (banks) with a relatively small number of employees. Especially in case it's on a cost per employee basis and automation kicks in. The license cost would literally evaporate...

Bitcoin will.

But buy LINK anyway. The project is quite good, user.

I mean, you don't know how significant the tx volume of interoperability will really be...

The banking system moves trillions of USD in assets daily.
Overledger improves the system, the value of their network will be mind blowing.
Yeah, I’m thinking Quantchads will make it.

Is that why:
"Chainlink developers have sold some $40 million worth of link this month according to our blockchain analysis of their holdings."

So the increase in "volume" referenced as being transferable via gateways due to an increase in staked QNT isn't TPS, but actual monetary value?

Yes

kek @ all these priced out quantfags

>the tokens are used for the gateway meme and licenses used only by a relatively small number of entities (banks) with a relatively small number of employees.
A small number of entities that shuffles billions around every single day, this won't just be a one and done hodl

Do banks who make use of permissioned chains have to stake, as well? Or only permissionless chains making use of community gateways? IIRC this was also one of the big questions in regards to link...

Unironically link, sweetie

> Sell signal

Let’s rephrase this question:

Gilbert Verdian or Sergey Nazarov?

*Apparently they do. Still not sure whether volume refers to tx, $ value, or both...

QNT will save you from a link stack even if you don't sell your link.

Just buy CLV or VRC, same chadmin