Every crypto will use Quant and Chainlink
Other urls found in this thread:
tools.ietf.org
twitter.com
Quant and Link chads are all going to make it.
Please note, though - although priced roughly the same right now, QNT only has a 14 million maximum supply. This means QNT’s fair price relative to LINK is $300.
Link yes
QNT no
Hundreds of companies provably use LINK while nobody knows/use QNT
Kek, hundreds of banks and a dozen central banks are hooked into Quant’s Overledger.
Link’s client base doesn’t compare.
You’ll come around eventually, fren.
Quantfags are shitting up this board
>Hundreds of companies provably use LINK while nobody knows/use QNT
Okay. Lets start
R3? Knows nothing about QNT
Accenture? Knows nothing about QNT
Hyperledger? Knows nothing about QNT
Your only catch is SIA with 560 bank NODES which could be 1 bank with 560 NODES
WTF are you basing your daily shills on?
BSN the blockchain of China is using Cosmos and LINK
They and dozens others dont have a problem mentioning solutions. NDA yeah?
get out while you can retards
What the fuck are you talking about?
You’re literally so wrong and out of the loop, it’s entertaining.
Not quite.
You're mentally deficient, or merely jesting
Bring me proof because name calling wont help
NOBODY KNOWS ABOUT QNT OTHER THAN SIA's 1 BANK WITH 560 NODES
I know Sibos was bought, Oracle partnership bought
Oracle even shilled total wrecks like Noia but never mentioned the holy grail of Interoperability
you cucks are shilling a blockexplorer with a token
He’s still accumulating QNT.
> nobody knows about Quant
> he doesn’t know about MIT
> he doesn’t know about Intel
> he doesn’t know about Qualcomm
Sad!
Don't bother they are pajeet shills.
There you go again with the fucking Internet Draft paper.
Holy shit I have been out of biz for 6 months and you are still fudding qnt here lmao. You told us qnt will go 0$ when it was 1.5$. Now it is breaking ATH soon. Are you retarded or just trolling here every day?
iExec is much better than Quant
Everyone needs to read this paper on ODAP:
tools.ietf.org
Fudsters on suicide watch, kekek.
You need to ask Gilles to contact Gilbert and propose a partnership.
It might help save iExec.
See>Internet Draft paper
> doesn’t know how RFC works
> doesn’t know who MIT are
> doesn’t know who Intel are
Even more sad!
you know what draft paper means?
MIT get paid to research thats their fucking job
and anyone can upload their shitty tech on this website doesnt mean anything if nobody knows or uses QNT
This for fucks sake it's literally in the link they keep posting
>Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet- Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress.""
> doesn’t know how RFC works
> doesn’t know who MIT are
> doesn’t know who Intel are
How can any one retard be so, well... retarded?
>I'm going to ignore completely any arguments
>I'll just copy paste my greentext that will shut him up lel
> doesn’t own LINK
> doesn’t own QNT
> is a fag
> what is he even doing here?
Sad!
>is a jeet
>can't shill properly
>can't speak English properly
>can't greentext properly
>tries to connect a legitimate project to a vaporware shitcoin
>assumes I don't own LINK on a LINK board
This is a Quant board now.
Sia connects more than 1 bank. Try harder.
You fucking wish
Indeed. Any proof that some of these banks are using Overledger? I'll be satisfied with just one bank mate.
Any proof of Spunta or Perago integration?
What sort of "proof" do you usually require before investing into crypto projects?
The sort of proof ETH provided with EEA, or Chainlink with actual real world adoption, BSN integration, InterWork Alliance formation, transparency regarding development, and actual enterprises (T-Mobile) using that technology.
Is that too much to ask?