the guy just said he thinks its dumb to have stop losses cuz you need to believe in your stocks and all i said was no there could be a random bad news event you werent expecting and tank your entire portfolio down 50% within minutes
strange to look at the price action, considering all the cancellations (marked at the beginning of the chart is sept 9th), actually went on a major bull run. would there have been any way to know so many people were canceling at that time? or should i just be following twitter hashtag trends on specific companies more often?
Yes it is. Fidelity is the way to go. I plan on buying more when I get my next unemployment check.
Joshua Ortiz
*softbank crash, sorry. obviously this shit doesn't work during covid or 2008 style clusterfucks, those you should just stay out of but those only happen once a decade, if even that, and you should know about them from the news or at the very least from the circuit breakers.
Hudson Fisher
>let me just overfit this one example >wtf? see? TA works All of youre posts are like this.
Anyone else daydream about being able to time travel back 24 hours and become a billionaire
Sebastian Davis
I'm a leaf so my choices basically boil down to Questrade and Wealthsimple (IBKR is apparently great but they want me to have things like "an income" in order to trade stock)
Owen Phillips
SPAC hype is over
Ian Roberts
$420.69
Jack Jones
I don't care about SPACs, I care about SPACE TUGS. There's basically three players in that space and two are private (ULA and RocketLab). Space tugs will be a big thing when Starship is flying regularly, because it lets you launch on whatever trajectory Starship happens to be flying, and reposition your satellite to your desired orbit. Starship is a bulk space yeeter, but it's like a bus – it's going where it's going, and it's up to you to find last mile transport.
Aiden Powell
>pre new consoles $30 >after $10
Nolan Smith
>overfit
lmao nope, it's always gonna be a 200 hour SMA with some form of 10x or greater ATR keltner channel. the only question really is whether you want to wait for the big dip which happens much less frequently, or take smaller positions at lesser values and scale in and out if it goes down further. buying below the 200 hour SMA is still always going to be good value (not including literal crashes which are extremely rare), as long as the stock or index is fundamentally solid.
you don't have to believe me, put it on your own chart and look at your favorite stock and see for yourself. volatility is a mean-reverting phenomenon, it's just a fact. all my chart is telling you is when price has moved too far away from the average too fast, and as such is likely to reverse. pretty straightforward. only thing you really need to account for is the impact of company news and world events. even like with the softbank manipulation, it can get above that level but it likely won't stay up there for very long, and if it does it's likely due to some kind of manipulation that you should be very wary of. not including low float penny stock shit of course.
im not overfitting though, you want to give me a stock to look at i can look at it with the same settings easily.
Isaac Evans
Don't let dreams let be dreams.
Just find the Die Glocke Bell time machine to 1995, find a job at McDonald's, accidentally bump into Jezz Bezos, such his dick and ask him to be business partners.
Oh ok you are talking about 5 - 10 years investements.
Landon Diaz
>you don't have to believe me, put it on your own chart I did. I already confimed that you're a faggot. There's a simple reason why. Because stocks don't work like that. You're drawing lines around the shadows on the cave wall. Technicals are secondary.
Landon Anderson
So pretty much work is dead and the only way for millennials to become wealthy, buy a big house, and afford lots of kids is to do anything BUT work:
