You WILL get the vaccine

Attached: GettyImages-1252191631-645x645.jpg (645x645, 63.37K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=uxde0IImnWs
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

No.

Attached: whenyouhearit.gif (420x431, 3.08M)

Yup. Thanks for helping it get to my city, Bill!

Ok, thanks a lot Gates. Hope those anti-patriotic trumptards don't disturb us.

Yep, thanks for that shit tier Pester file you included in muh windows.

id rather go out shooting then hop on a boat to belize

okay master

what did he mean by this?

Attached: BILL-GATES.jpg (2199x802, 353.41K)

You have lost.

Attached: revengeofthesith-macewindu-lightsaber.jpg (1133x529, 235.05K)

youtube.com/watch?v=uxde0IImnWs

This. Will shoot my way out of any situation involving forced vaccinations

No I'd rather be sick for two weeks and pass a deadly virus to my vulnerable family members.

Imagine a virus so deadly you need to do a test to know you have it.

thank you mr. Jobs (owner of Amazon), very cool

You will get the vaccine

Attached: 53B2EC08-C795-4806-A130-223D113FD9C2.jpg (800x1000, 77.94K)

You need to be tested to know you have any virus. Feel free to believe covid is overblown, but this retarded meme needs to die.

Not for a deadly virus.

No I will not alter my DNA mr gates. BECAUSE IM A ANTI VAXER

Please explain the retarded logic that makes think this.

Haha, make me poop jar man

Attached: 1595148139145.jpg (636x382, 44.46K)

CATCH THE PISS, WHYTE BOI

Attached: 2079888E-2B66-4FA9-A336-BF838282B883.png (1334x750, 3.07M)

If the virus is deadly, you just die, so there is no need for a test.
Ebola, for example, killed the host in a matter of hours.

So your definition of deadly virus is only something that kills someone in a matter of hours?
HIV, Dengue, Smallpox, Sars, etc aren't deadly viruses, despite all the people they've killed?

They are deadly too, and easily detectable.

Detectible, by tests...

No thanks

Flu is deadly. Even water is deadly.

You are a complete retard

It doesn't kill all the people, it kills some of the people who get it.
Which is reason enough to try to not get it and spread it to others.

I don't know why this is controversial.
I can act in a way that has a higher chance of one of my loved ones dying,
Or I can act in a way that has a lower chance of causing one of my loved ones to die.
Either way doesn't really impact my life in a meaningful way (like I wear a mask inside stores, wash my hands more often, otherwise no major changes).
Why do people insist that it isn't deadly "enough" to take such actions? Any percentage of death is more death than there was without this virus. So why shouldn't we work together to limit the toll?

The logic is that if a virus is dangerous enough to warrant extreme preventative measures, then you'll know you have it without requiring a test to confirm it because you'll be exhibiting the symptoms that constitute its danger. This is the case with all of the viruses you list in , with the exception of HIV. And, with the same exception, no one tests for any of those viruses in the absence of symptoms.

Then stay in your basement. I'm going outside to get fresh air and not live in fear because of ALL of the viruses that might be out there.You know there is more than one virus in the world.

because you crashed the entire fucking economy over it. if you're so fucking scared, stay the fuck indoors. do you even comprehend what it means to people to have their entire livlihoods destroyed over this bullshit? do you comprehend what ar15s selling out in every store in america means? do you understand, at all, how many millions of people you and your faggoty meme-coof ilk have fucking left with nothing to live for? jesus fucking christ you brainlet, you have no idea what's coming, good luck.

Why didn't you care about doing these things during a normal flu season?

how many SAFEX coins could Bill Gates buy if Bill Gates could buy SAFEX?

high likelihood that i will be wearing bill gate's face while he begs for death within the next year

>if a virus is dangerous enough to warrant extreme preventative measures, then you'll know you have it without requiring a test to confirm
You realize the people on ventilators dying from this virus are fully aware they have it and can't breathe and are dying.
I don't understand your point ... that everyone why carries or transmits the virus must be aware they have it or measures aren't needed?
If everybody who has it is that sick, it wouldn't be such a problem ... because people would stay home, etc.
The reason this particular virus is so problematic is precisely that reason that so many people can have it and transmit it without getting super sick. That's exactly why we should try to limit transmitability.

>I can act in a way that has a higher chance of one of my loved ones dying,
>Or I can act in a way that has a lower chance of causing one of my loved ones to die.
When did you campaign to ban fast food since heart disease kills more Americans than any virus? What about alcohol, where were you on that issue? My little sister was ran over by a drunk driver, but I've never seen a cultural movement to ban alcohol consumption. What about all the homeless people and trash in LA which is causing other diseases to spread, why did no one ever care about that? What about smoking? Driving? How about social media, which has arguably been the greatest contribute to increased suicides over the last two decades. What about medical error, the third leading cause of death in the US?

Because no one who virtue signals about following coronavirus policies cares about saving lives, its about something else.

I'm not fearful - I live my life the same as before. Just wearing a mask when I go to the store. No big deal.
Also I didn't crash the economy, and we're not even talking about shutting down stores and restaurants and shit. This is a thread about a vaccine. Getting a vaccine or not getting a vaccine has nothing to do with "shutting down the economy."
Not everything is black and white you know.
You can support getting a vaccine and still support keeping stores open.

if you're an immunocompromised person or a person waiting to die from chronic long-term disease, then you will need to take care to limit your exposure to the public. everyone else is fine. common colds are common.

>When did you campaign to ban fast food since heart disease kills more Americans than any virus? What about alcohol, where were you on that issue? My little sister was ran over by a drunk driver, but I've never seen a cultural movement to ban alcohol consumption.
Jesus christ talk about moving the goalpost.
I'm not talking about banning or changing anything about behavior.
This is about whether I'll get a vaccine when it's available.
Yes, I will.

Have fun vaccinating my dead corpse since that is the only way I ever take that 666 vaccine.

flu vaccines only reduce your odds of getting the flu by 50%. if you have a 1% chance of getting the flu, congratulations on your vaccine, now you have 0.5% probability of contracting the flu. completely useless. speaking of the flu virus, masks are unable to stop its transmission. turns out that masks cant stop viral particles, or in some cases, will collect viral particles and increase your odds of catching a disease. nice work.

that's fine, I'm not really talking about you then, I'm responding to your argument, which is the main rationalization that people use to justify forced masks, forced vaccines, forced social distancing, forceful closing down of businesses, etc.

this is payback for all those pirated copies of windows you little cunts

Nigger I hope Bill Gates sterilizes you. You fucking dumb cattle. And after that you’ll go to Hell because you took the mark of the beast. Have fun shilling for masons and jews.

Attached: 2E2BE30D-BCDC-40EF-A891-55EA7E3DF39B.jpg (682x736, 87.62K)