Daily reminder

Which is why BTC is going down. Imagine that monstrosity continuing with the name Bitcoin.

It's doing human genetics a favor, you'll just drag the average IQ down

r/buttcoin2.0

Under serious scrutiny, it seems unlikely that CW is a fraud:
1. Anderson claims he signed a transaction of satoshi in front of him and the signatures match.
2. And. also said he was convinced by his manner of speaking, knowledge of the protocol and general attitude.
3. A lie of this magnitude would completely tarnish his reputation, and it seems that one existed before the satoshi ordeal. seems unlikely for a reputable person to blatantly lie about something as big as this.

All in all I think it is more likely that he is Sat than not. His character and likeability are of no relevance to the matter

based og

yeah let's not go there it's not like the honey badger gives a fuck about ticks... the honey badger doesn't give a fuck about lions.

based village

CSW got fucked by Richard. Just imagine

Just lol. Hex has owned it hours ago.

For me, it's default judgements

>faggoted OP

>the corecuck comes into the bsv thread to not give a fuck about it

Attached: Satoshi.Nakamoto.Getonyourknees.Edition.jpg (1024x683, 51.54K)

the honey badger goes where it pleases, worm...

TiK ToK corecucks
Segwit coin isnt Bitcoin

Attached: Djk8jCYVAAE_30U.png (1012x543, 243.11K)

how could they mess that image up so bad?
the script hash validates the sigscript that contains the signature and it's part of the transaction. all segwit does is move the actual sigscript outside the main block to an extension block and for a block to be valid on segwit ruleset the sigscript must be valid all the same like with a regular transaction.
only bitcoin clients not updated since 2016 would not validate segwit signatures. and those don't really exist.

i don't even know how to begin to fix this graph... it's just fucked.
you literally don't hash Alice's pubkey into the output but the next SH (it's a p2sh address after all) and the next SH validates Alice's sigscript which in turn validates Alice's signature.
and spends don't reference transactions they reference utxos...
it's just fucked... they oversimplified it to the point where it's just a big lie.

I thought the real bitcoin was just called Bitcoin?
I bet you were that weird kid in school that tried convincing everybody that your 5$ gypsy market "Hike" sneakers were a limited edition pair of Nike.

Core cucks are about to hit 100k, but in transaction fees compared to BSV.

Attached: fee.png (523x69, 4.47K)

Attached: cope.png (918x255, 14.63K)

What does SegWit Do?
Under the proposed system of Segregated Witness, an extended block must be created alongside the main block. This extended block would contain the signature data of the transaction. The system proposes that the main block is divided into two, one with just the signature data, and the other with just the record of the occurrence of the transaction.
This would substantially reduce the space occupied per transaction in the main block and would enable the recording of a greater number of transactions without piling up more and more blocks frequently. This would also reduce the weight per block in the blockchain of transactions, which in turn would reduce congestion and ensure that the network does not slow down. Thus, transactions could be verified much quicker than they are being currently.

So apparently Iran is going to use bitcoin to circumvent the (((USA)))'s economic sanctions. Should we buy