The Graph is one of the most adopted projecte atm (9 billion queries per month)

Attached: 101B9E9B-DA10-43E5-9310-960F54E53E8E.jpg (700x365, 226.46K)

kys

Missed the sale?

Even if you got into the sale you could only have bought $5k worth. Literally nobody in retail has a chance to get a full stack yet.

I see, so actually we should’nt be talking about this project until we filled up our bags first?

It's way bigger than Zig Forums, it's going to be a feeding frenzy at launch anyway. The question is just does it pump and hold, or does everyone that FOMOs in at the start get J curved.

Most likely a J curve, it’ll probably open af multiples at the flippers/short term holders will take profit. After some consolidation it’ll pump untill the 6 months unlocked and another retrace will happen imo. After that the only way is up.

Yeah i'm trying to pin down what price I draw the line at, but it's hard. I would say up to $0.15 I would be fairly confident about going in, which is an instant 5x for the crowdsale buyers. Much more than that and I might wait 6 months until some "next big things" have come along and sentiment has settled a bit.

When is trading going live?

To be fair, in the long term the diluted marketcap is more important. $0.15 gives it a diluted cap of $1.5B. You should the ask yourself, is this a fair valuation or will it be much higher in 1-2-3 years..

Still only Ethereum data accessible? Covalent can do this AND Polkadot AND Cosmos.
And Covalent didn't fuck up its own token sale yet

Attached: cqt.jpg (710x710, 287.32K)

You're getting dumped on tubs.

Incoming red wojacks at the 6 month inflation wave.

Attached: GRT memes 3.png (1489x674, 152.41K)

>Covalent
chinese VCs? pass

The closest one to "chinese vc" here is Coingecko lol

Attached: backerscqt.png (962x479, 114.81K)

first of all the Graph is in talk with all major layer 1 protocols Polkadot and Cardano included. Second of all Covalent is centralized. Third of all it’s already obvious which protocol is winning the race by a landslide. And lastly TRG capital is a scam VC. So this says alot about Covalent.

Have you looked at the tokenomics of Chainlink, Hashgraph, Avalanche, Algorand, Filecoin, Serum? Then you’ll know that nobody gives a shit about locked tokens.

>is in talk
yeah that's what everyone says here. "we are in talk with Binance regarding listing" is not equal to "we are listed on Binance"
>Covalent is centralized
So what, how is that a problem? I noticed its a recurring part in Graph narrative. Covalent isn't building a farm or a network, they are in data analytics business.
>Lastly, TRG capital is a scam VC
That's a pretty big claim

Point 1. Fair enough, lets wait that one out.
Point 2. If they stay centralized, then they shouldn’t create a token don’t you agree?
Point 3. I’ve done business with them. Also they were the one that heavily shilled Sparkster (together with Balina).

There's zero reason why this type of layer would need to be decentralized and have a token except to make opportunists rich, similar to unibright. It's not a network, there's no network effect.

oh NO NON ON ONONNOONNO user don't do it sir you are fucked if you do.

wait for bonded.finance

(redacted) partnership on (redacted)
(redacted) partnership on (redacted)
(redacted) partnership on (redacted)

Actually there is. Decentralized networks/exchanges (Uniswap i.e) will need to use an indexing/quering protocol for fast and efficient transactions/communications. If they end up using a centralized indexing/quering protocol (hosted on AWS for example) then the whole point of decentralization/DeFi is gone. You shut down the centralized hosting point and the whole DeFi space is dead.