Why is Quant not top10

Tell me the truth

Attached: quant.jpg (250x250, 4.23K)

Other urls found in this thread:

twitter.com/cryptoseq/status/1318653571110404097
twitter.com/theoverledger/status/1318139636707975168?s=21
twitter.com/theoverledger/
ledgerinsights.com/digital-dollar-cbdc-us-congress-hearing/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

(It's a ponzi)

Attached: 1598448882398.png (473x500, 181.23K)

It’s still under the radar for the majority of the crypto crowd. They literally do not understand its genius.

It will be shock and awe when the price finally takes off. Think Chainlink 100x and then some.

tokenita no es necessita

Tokens not needed. Just to pay the subscription with it LOL are u serious. Could also be paid with dollars or any other crypto

This is how lame Quant fud is. These fags can’t buy their stacks back which they sold at $2. We are now at $16, going to $160.

Kek, they are pathetic!!

Token not needed.

This, it's also not on big exchanges because gil doesn't want a huge speculative bubble before OVN goes live.

Pic related, this is a forwarded message from Gilbert posted in the tg in regards to exchange listings.

can you sum up why, frend

Forgot pic

Attached: Screenshot_20201107-165651~3.png (1080x1936, 320.04K)

Zig Forums does not understand the magnitude of QNT. Just DYOR.

Start here: twitter.com/cryptoseq/status/1318653571110404097

Quant themselves congratulated the author of the thread, Seq, on its quality.

ETA on when OVN goes live?

>This, it's also not on big exchanges because gil doesn't want a huge speculative bubble before OVN goes live.


This. I admit I used to be frustrated by Gilbert's exchange position.

But it's fucking genius, it's perfect. Just look at the chart this year - that could not possibly be better. It's been controlled exactly as necessary to ensure a solid, sustainable growth. Bubbles do not help yet. When the whole market goes apeshit, QNT will be along with the ride.

It's established on uniswap now and that is unironically enough to guarantee total participation in a major bullrun, when that finally comes.

Until then, Gil is doing things just right.

Attached: whatnext.png (1027x574, 40.13K)

I have no clue, people were speculating Q1 2021, since launching something like this now right before Christmas/end of q4 doesn't really make sense, since all their customers probably wouldn't even implement it until Q1 anyways. Idk if youve ever worked in an office, but literally nothing gets done in December, it all gets pushed to next year.

The man's a cold calculating genius. Like I said in another thread
>For guys like this, a 'pump and dump' lasts for 30 years
Guys like gil don't know how to do anything but play the long game

The token is needed.
- license subscription
- platform fees
- consumption fees
- developer fees

Maybe they didn’t have to make a token, but since they did that means the token certainly has utility. Correct?

This will mean that more adoption leads to increase in token price.

And what's funny, because of how banks work they literally have to include us in their vision. Don't get it twisted, I'm pretty sure gil would rather just keep this internal and make all the bank himself. But, banks require proof of concept and real-world usage before they adopt new tech. Unfortunately (for them), blockchain networks need a large user/investor base to work properly. So, gilbert was faced with either releasing slowly and getting the Zig Forums autists onboard with insanely heavy technicals and more breadcrumbs than any other crypto project Ive ever seen. Or, he could get the zoomer moonboi reddit pajeets involved and turn his project into a pnd shitcoin with a million bagholder's village all waiting on the edge of their seat to cash out. Gil's going with autism, to say the least.

Just one tip guys :
1) Sell all your useless shitcoins
2) Buy the biggest QNT that you can afford to buy
3) Congrats you've made it.

Oh , and don't be surprised to see Quant climbing to the top 5.
It's just a matter of time.
DYOR, you will understand better.

Do you think the token is needed?

first 100k coin

Yes, it is needed, pic related. Btw, in Gil's own words (I'm paraphrasing a little)
>Central banks and financial institutions in general are just one vertical
Quant isn't just stopping at banks, the longterm vision is much larger than that

Attached: 20201107_133400.jpg (1080x699, 162.27K)

Delusional

Price prediction for future? Not financial advice just curious

Token not needed. Gilbert didnt even plan to introduce a token. Only because of the ICO hype in 2017/2018. Its an obvious cash grab. No fud, just the truth. But some poor fellas here are so emotional attached to their little bags...

>The token is needed.
>- license subscription
>- platform fees
>- consumption fees
>- developer fees
>Maybe they didn’t have to make a token, but since they did that means the token certainly has utility. Correct?
Opinion?

I have no clue desu, and it's hard to guess without knowing their fee structure and what kind of volume they'll be dealing with once ovn goes live. I'd basically just be throwing out random numbers, because even though customers will need quant tokens to perform overledger functions (think: eth with the etherium network), we don't know exactly how much.

Then why are quant tokens needed as payment for every single transaction on the overledger network? He's not doing this because of the ICO craze, he's doing it because banks don't adopt unproven/untested tech. He had no choice here, as explained here The reason we're allowed in this is just due to banks infrastructure adoption. They always go with private contractors rather than developing purely internally, but with blockchain you can't really have a tested, proven network without allowing regular investors in. It's a catch 22 that we benefit heavily from.

They DO need a token, I dont expect pajeets to understand why in this technological marvel

twitter.com/theoverledger/status/1318139636707975168?s=21

First of all it’s not even a blockchain/DLT
Second of all it’s patented and not public
So it makes no sense to create a whole new token for this. They can just let consumers pay in fiat or ETH for the subscription. Why are you guys so blinded by your emotions?

Read my fking post pajeet, it not being a blockchain is what makes it so bloody good. Check the twitter account of this account: twitter.com/theoverledger/

You are fucking retarded.

What the fuck do you have to do with Quant’s business model? Fuck all, kek.

Quant’s business model requires QNT. It is their universal utility token needed for licences, access, transactions, payments, staking and so on.

So fuck off with your fud, brainlet.

ledgerinsights.com/digital-dollar-cbdc-us-congress-hearing/

>It continues: “Unlike the CBDC approaches currently under discussion, which would use complicated and inefficient distributed ledger technology and would be walled off from the existing system of money and payments, the FedAccount CBDC would be seamlessly interoperable with the mainstream payment system and would rely on technologies that the Federal Reserve has used successfully for decades.”
>FedAccount CBDC would be seamlessly interoperable with the mainstream payment system

Guess which blockchain company is the only one able to do this currently? Think it's a coincidence that while everyone was working on blockchain -> blockchain interoperability, gil was looking at blockchain -> offchain interoperability, and that he just happened to come from a central banking background (has worked at the fed reserve and uk ministry of finance)?

All part of the plan. Tech like ripple, eth, ocean, chainlink, swift, iso 20222, etc getting adopted is bullish for quant, since OVN will bridge them all together.

>He had no choice here, as explained here
If we forget about this, then yes he could have just not made a token and let consumers pay in fiat. But since they did choose to create a new token, it doesn't mean it has no value. It's still needed in the network

So emotionally attached baka
Goodluck with this cash grab

Why do you think banks pay each other using essentially the same money we do (Eurodollar shadow banking excluded)? They need the supply/demand from regular people to give the currency value... If there's no adoption or speculative nature, theres no currency, and they're just shuffling useless shitcoins back and forth

Refute this twitter.com/theoverledger/status/1318139636707975168?s=21

Token is needed, stop your shitty fud campaign jesse

Fuck of back to asylum, mental case.