they are the true bitcoin, but that doesn't matter when you're up against brands and people. it didn't matter whether craig was satoshi or not.
seems like most of my bitcoin SV is in an unsplit BCH wallet... ugh. what's the easiest way to split? not sure if this is worth the headache.
He's basically hover handing those 40 year old slappers
>not hover handing
"he's basically hover handing"
You won't make it. You don't understand tech, you don't understand economy, and you don't understand people.
t. tech illiterate
Sure sure brainlets. You use Lightning Network often, do you?
theyve given up on bitcoin entirely.
what do you think could contribute to bsv's (or bch's) success?
i think:
tiny fees
layer 0 stablecoins (maybe SLP style)
cool scrypt functions
moneybutton type identication, signatures
the data storage/timestamp functionality has use cases but havent seen anyone care enough about that yet
>it didn't matter whether craig was satoshi or not.
He's not.
>You use Lightning Network often, do you?
Never. Also never BCH or BSV. I don't pay for things with crypto, I invest in crypto. I also don't pay for things with my shares. A credit card where you pay for things by selling fractional shares would be feasible, but not something I would be interested in. That's what cash, paypal and possibly USDT/USDC is for.
all bitcoin needs is actual usage to buy goods and services. BTC's refusal to remove the block size limit (meaning higher fees) was hostile to actual usage. all i wanted was for the block size limit to be removed, which is why I was disappointed when BSV needed to fork off BCH because they started to mess around with the protocol. but... BSV failed to get what it needed the most: actual usage.
and yeah, craig also failed to prove he was satoshi.
not a true believer i see. but that's ok, most in crypto aren't.