Kirby gives u a simple financial advice

not buying your bags emin you turkroach cunt

stay poor haterz!

Attached: avax.jpg (577x432, 83.07K)

Can we stake avax?

This link helps u mate
medium.com/avalabs/staking-avax-by-validating-or-delegating-with-the-avalanche-wallet-f4d9adc182a6

Still not too late jump on the train. Buy AVAX now!!!

someone shill me on this, i want to believe
why won't this project fail? read the whitepaper and it seems to fall short of what's promised

also stop spamming our board you ic3 faggots.

Fall short how? The platforms been out for 8 weeks and is fully functional. Subnets, tokens, nfts, evm contract support, etc etc...

i'll just leave this here for u

you have no other option but to accept assimilation faggot

Attached: 128371298371237.png (1046x481, 99.3K)

Falls short because this graph, directly from whitepaper, conflicts with claim of resistance to 51% attack
which seems to me like the biggest advertised strength, everything else exists elsewhere in the crypto sphere
the strength of avax are the alleged properties of its consensus algorithm
maybe i'm just a brainlet and haven't considered what parameters avax actually uses for the Avalanche consensus in the network, idk

Attached: snowflake_bft.png (423x228, 34.27K)

>1.000 avax is a "make it" stack
Actually the make it stack is 2000 because thats the minimum amount needed to run a node and thats what you should be aiming for.

>Nodes give you passive income and are easy to run
>VPS are cheap (15 bucks a month)
>in the future Nodes will Validate other subnets making you even more money
>People can delegate to your node and increase your rewards
>you contribute to decentralization

Attached: 1604743297222.jpg (488x629, 45.91K)

oh not only am i skeptical of the claim of resistance to 80%, their site also admits that only safety is preserved up to 80%, liveness is compromised at a lower threshold, presumably the one specified in the graph above (33%). and if the entire network can just be prevented from transacting that's not useful

this is fucking poetry

it's just fiverr paid shilling

>conflicts with claim of resistance to 51% attack
you would need 80% control to attack it
Emin said it.

emin wrote the paper that graph came from

>> haven't considered what parameters avax actually uses for the Avalanche consensus in the network

Correct, right now its not resistant to 51% because it is going for liveness over safety. It be parameratized up to 80%, but this is one of the params that is being waited on for governance to vote on, sometime early next year.

>> everything else exists elsewhere in the crypto sphere

In some capacity, but not anywhere close to the extent that it does on Avalanhce. A good example is subnets vs parachains. The are very similar, but while polkadot is limited to 100 chains, and the process to creating these chains is complex and involves a very expensive bidding process, Avlanache is not limited in number, and anyone can spin up a VM and chain with a few bucks and some basic CS knowledge. Many things exist somewhere in the cryposphere, but they suck in execution and effectiveness in comparison.

Emin is a smart guy, there is a reason hes the Number 2 of IC3.

emin is also full of shit and wants to make a quick buck off of rubes like you.

Emin delivered on his promise.
I run a node since mainnet launch and it works as advertised.
Its decentralized and its fast and there is basically no risk running a node.

Got any more of that low tier fud?

Attached: 1599491964835.png (438x543, 266.81K)

You know what they say about things that sound too good to be true. On a sidenote though, if avax is so good then why the need for a persistent shill campaign on Zig Forums?

>things that sound too good to be true
He delivered and it works so its not too good to be true, its already reality and working as intended.

>if avax is so good then why the need for a persistent shill campaign on Zig Forums?
Because its good and exciting technology with huge potential. So same reason why we have so many Chainlink threads.

I agree which is why I'm listening to his paper:
"once the network drifts to some majority value, it tends to revert back with only an exponentially small probability."
so if anywhere more than 51% reports a false value it sounds a lot like the entire network should converge to this falsity

>he delivered
that 80% number hasn't been proven out at all and that is the most important part.

>if avax is so good then why the need for a persistent shill campaign on Zig Forums?
there are literally 20 LINK threads per minute

in the case you're implying LINK is not good because it needs to be shilled, you're straight retarded.

Ppl talk about it because its features are constantly highlighted, the same happens on Twitter (pic related). AVAX is probably the 2nd best altcoin for 2021, and the market has already anticipated it.

Attached: 161287326138712638712.png (2048x1152, 759.02K)

Which is statistically almost impossible, Emin said a failure could occur maybe every 5000 years or so.

so you agree that the system will converge to the majority reported value but you don't see how this makes a 51% attack possible?

Attached: brainlet.jpg (800x450, 44.6K)