Nano is in front of everyone. But this shit is radical in term of attention, FOMO is either extreme or "the coin is dead".
Most people here will buy above $10.
This shit will hit 5B of market cap, at least.
Triple digits is a question of when, not if.
Yes, a x10 with BTC can be nice. But what about the next x100-x200 of this bull cycle?
Hope you are accumulating user
Other urls found in this thread:
usa.visa.com
archive.is
archive.is
youtube.com
forum.nano.org
warosu.org
twitter.com
lmao, RailBlocks is a scam from 2017, many other scams from that time are gone like Safex or Signatum, just let it rest in peace like the other scams
this is unironically a shit coin
Pic, Nano hodler getting assraped since January 2018 by the Nano Devs, Italian scammers and the market, buying some more, while screaming:
"2 da moooOooooooOooon!!!"
Nano is a scam by ultra-liberal SJW faggots. Here:
Still the best p2p tech in the space despite butthurt people calling it a scam. Go figure.
The people running this project are dumping on idiot bag holders every week, the coin is a low IQ database with nothing of value. The NF officers are SJW faggots that care more about forcing their gay social values on bagholders, than they do about making a good crypto. The coin is down 99.9% from ATH. SJW faggot devs are always arguing with idiots on twitter. SJW faggot devs are always showing off in social media.
Sorry OP, you got scammed into buying an SJW shitcoin. It's going to zero, so you'd be wise to sell while your portfolio is still worth something.
So fucking bullshit when reading this worthless FUD ahaha
I like this asset and I will holderino.
>Still the best p2p tech in the space despite butthurt people calling it a scam.
Wrong. Your shitcoin can't even give 10% of your promised tps in 2017 and is still wide open for spam attacks crashing your shitcoin. There is no way in hell your shitcoin will ever be a global currency. Even former Nano core dev Zack Shapiro has no faith in Nano, pic.
Within a few months, the insane Nano scammers will have burned through all their Nano Foundation funds. Leaving Nano as a half-finished crashed tech project, dead in the water. Super bullish, ryte guys? Pic related.
This is again some BS. This is a purely theoretical discussion.
It's not clear why would LN become mainstream and widely adopted. I don't know anyone (me included) who would use LN on an everyday basis.
If LN is the best innovation for digital money, no thanks I prefer to use my fiat based apps like Venmo. It's just better.
NANO keep outperforming itself in performance and did 1400+ CPS (TPS with network finality !) on consumer hardware, without really reaching saturation theoretically.
If NANO grew larger and serious hardware were to be put on this network, it's max CPS would be far higher. Even though >1000 CPS is more than plenty these days.
+ I see the foundation running out of money as a positive.
Fully distributed, network is running for more than 4-5 years now.
The UX is a pleasure.
The only bet against NANO is to say that a 1990-like digital currency that is slow and not scalable is the only innovation brought by the crypto space. Allow me to doubt that
NANO is a good hold. Won't sell any before $20
Fucking Reddit faggot. Stop shilling this shitcoin
I like nano too my fren. it might not be soon, but once the wars for actual peer to peer internet currency starts nano is a very good contender. not to mention DAG tech and fully distributed with no inflation. when i was doing tests this asset was one of my favorites.
Nano is very controversial cause its so different. I think its a good bet.
it fits perfectly in my diverse portfolio.
Except Nano isn't a crashed tech project.
It works continuously and is a freaking pleasure to use.
It literally just needs to be picked up and used, like BTC.
Dude just stop, you're obviously one of the fanatical reddit fags that will endlessly shill this coin. You've probably pissed off everyone on cc and can't find any other idiots to baghold your scam of a project on that website, so now you're trying to scam people on Zig Forums.
Your coin is dead. Fuck off. You've likely cost many people tens of thousands of dollars with your shameless shilling. Nano is old news and down 99%. It's done. It doesn't do anything impressive. Cut your losses and move on, and certainly don't drag other people down with you. The sooner you realize this the sooner you'll start making money again.
>CPS (TPS with network finality !)
CPS is not the same as TPS, Nano scammer. TPS is roughly 50% of CPS.
>1000 CPS is more than plenty these days
Insane comment. That's only 500 TPS and even VISA is calibrated for 65 000 TPS, even though they are not designed to cover the unbanked and do micro-payments, as your Nano NF scammers claim regarding Nano.
usa.visa.com
Only reason why you have ever heard about Nano is that they lied about their 7000 tps, when BTC was clogged in Dec 2017. Pic. Why did Nano scammers lie about their tps?
Here is sad reality. Not the promised 7000 tps they lied about, but a meager 75 tps. Rougly 1% of what the Nano dev scammers promised. What a joke. Then you have Nano dev's criminal involvment with Bitgrail.
Nano Heading for Disaster – Dirty Deals with BitGrail
archive.is
Nano and Bitgrail leaders scammed over $100 million from Bitgrail
archive.is
Nano was pushed by Italian scammers and lying devs. A clear pump and dump.
>Why Raiblocks (Nano) Will End as a Pump & Dump
youtube.com
nano is pajet coin
>Here is sad reality. Not the promised 7000 tps they lied about, but a meager 75 tps. Rougly 1% of what the Nano dev scammers promised. What a joke
Pic.
get the fuck out you scamming italian piece of shit
Stop guys I'm not from Reddit, I only participate here as it's anonymous. I invested in ETH back in 2016, then now today in NANO and ALGO for example.
> CPS is not the same as TPS, Nano scammer. TPS is roughly 50% of CPS.
Are you dumb? "Confirmations Per Second (CPS) is the preferred measure of Nano scalability because TPS is a per-node measurement that can vary significantly. CPS is the rate at which the network as a whole confirms transactions, which is what really matters." CPS Insane comment. That's only 500 TPS and even VISA is calibrated for 65 000 TPS, even though they are not designed to cover the unbanked and do micro-payments
What, you think it's not good to bother with a 1000 TPS decentralized layer 1 when BTC is
It is so cheap to attack this network for a well capitalized group, especially if an asic is invented. Just flood the network to its max capacity and watch as the dynamic proof of work adjusts upward to the point that honest users can't get their transactions through without outsourcing the proof of work. The whole feeless thing immediately breaks down when you can exploit the proof of work
Stop lying, ignorant Nano scammer.
"Remember that even just 50 TPS (100 CPS)"
forum.nano.org
Only Nano morons compare with old tech BTC. They have something that you don't: security. Your scam project has no chance against newer tech projects like Solana, future ETH 2.0 with one million TPS, etc etc.
Nano is not decentralized. Protocol updates happen frequently from an extremely small dev community, and proof of stake has never been demonstrated to be decentralized in the wild by any coin. All your stakers just end up on exchanges and they capture the network. In bitcoin at least there is somewhat of a checks and balances system between node operators and miners ( see user activated soft fork drama) and the extent of a 51% attack is limited only to censoring and not protocol violations due to a robust set of nodes, and transaction fees mitigate the censorship possibility because attacker only gets the dwindling block reward
Lying, ignorant Nano findom cucks like you are so annoying. Go back to /r/NanoCircleJerk with your scam.
Illusions and more illusions.
Bitcoin is backed only by people believing burning energy and fees is what secures a network. This is dumb.
> proof of stake has never been demonstrated to be decentralized in the wild by any coin
Proof of stakes works, because that's how the worlds currently works. Highest stakes decide the network, period. Mining gives the same results than proof of stake, but with extra steps, confusing everyone. People think making computers producing millions of hashes per minute is what makes a currency decentralized, wtf. I guess that's what happens when non-techies get involved with that.
NANO IS decentralized.
What's your argument? And what argument would that be, that is different than saying Ethereum 2.0 is not decentralized?
> Protocol updates happen frequently from an extremely small dev community
You lost absolutely your entire credibility.
Do you think Bitcoin never updated it's protocol? What you said is EXACTLY the same fucking situation than Bitcoin in its early years, and I was fucking there.
LMAO
Enjoy not ever using your brain guys
>muh toxic bitcoin community
the only reason any other "community" is nicer is because that's a more effective strategy to shill their shitcoin scam is to be "nice"... None of the shitcoins have a reason to hate one another, but all resent the king and by extension bitcoiners who have continued to be right about bitcoin's dominance. If a bitcoiner explains what something is either shit or just not going to be able to rival bitcoin, we're called big toxic meanies. Part of the appeal of a sovereign money like this is that one doesn't have to play politics either, so a lot of the OGs in bitcoin give a shit about being diplomatic like a politician would be.
*don't give a shit about being diplomatic
Are you so stupid that you don't know about Nano's rabid anti-trump, anti-nationalist, open borders and Jewish grifter Zack Shapiro.
Fall guy and fired after Nano's fraud and involvement with Italian scammers were exposed. Here inform yourself:
Team NANO - Sex, Fraud, Corruption and Satanists
warosu.org
Yeah i would say ethereum 2.0 isn't decentralized either so nice try. What happens with proof of stake is that normal people won't do it, and exchanges will. Since there is no checks and balances from regular users the network gets captured and controlled by a small group of insiders.
In bitcoin miners cannot capture the network because they are limited to following the protocol due to users running full nodes or their blocks are orphaned. The most they can do is censor but transaction fees means that some miner will still include your transaction.
As for dev stuff goes, in the early days bitcoin did update a lot but that is slowing down and each update is getting massive amounts of technical review and debate. Nano is nowhere close to that stage and outside of a small handful of people barely anyone works on the protocol. So obviously it is more centralized. Not saying it won't improve in the future if more people learn it, but world isn't going to wait around for a science project to prove itself right now
Nano has the worst community in crypto, with the lowest IQ, pic related
You insulting me is kind of a random non-sequitur to my comment regarding one specific thing he said... I bought XRB when it was under a dollar and made 60k off it in 2017, but no I don't remember who this guy is nor do I care. Nano ain't ever going to moon again, and it amuses me I've probably made way more off it than anyone who holds it today and believes in it.
I don't even know know what happened with all the shitgrail lawsuits and what not, going into 2018 I forgot about it completely. Luckily I bought from Mercatox or whatever the fuck it was called... Funny at the time I thought I was going with the shittiest and shadier of the two exchanges.. lol
I mean the bitgrail buyers getting so utterly and completely btfo tore the "community" apart, most everyone who fucked by shitgrail partly blamed the devs and just started to attack the project which they previously were shilling. It was absolutely brutal and one of the most epic implosions of a crypto. Those former shitgrail buyers who got ripped off salted the earth against nano ever regaining credibility or popularity amongst shitcoiners.
> In bitcoin miners cannot capture the network because they are limited to following the protocol due to users running full nodes or their blocks are orphaned. The most they can do is censor but transaction fees means that some miner will still include your transaction.
This is the core of the "btc maximalist propaganda" IMO.
Validators of Algorand or Ethereum (for example) are also limited to following the protocol, with mining or no mining.
Basically that, a consensus always happens fundamentally at the same level, wheter it stems from finding a solution to a hashing problem (mining) or just voting securely on transactions.
Mining and cryptographic hashes doesn't magically make a network resilient AF.
In Nano, validators have exactly the same power than in Bitcoin, they can censor if they collude, but if most of the network is honest (logical assumption made by 100% of all decentralized projects) they will just vote to prevent any double spending. (By the way, a large part of the NANO FUD is that there is no double spending prevention - which is a lie , it never happened so far)