Understanding sexual marketplace

Was it women's idea to commoditize and package their main asset (sex) for sale? Seems kind of stupid - before the current sexual liberation, sex was in high demand and in very short supply unless you were willing to commit to a woman.

Today it's the exact opposite situation - an equal or declining demand for sex but there is an oversupply of sexual gratification, and it's never been cheaper or more readily available.

How will this end for women and society in general? Marriage rates are already on the decline and I don't see that improving unless the sex supply dwindles once again.

Attached: 1583712670031.jpg (800x1002, 103.38K)

it works exactly like claiming haircomb token marketplace, you commit, and you hope you get what's yours

It's really simple you just sage threads like this

Sometimes I feel like the trends in the world can be explained by the increasing availability and growing social acceptance of short term gratification.

100-200 years ago you'd have to go out to have sex and you'd have to keep it under wraps or fuck a hooker in a back alley. On top of that you had culture and religious institutions enforcing monogamy.

Fast forward to today and this option is much more available, almost completely socially acceptable and to top it off even making money off it is becoming socially acceptable.

I don't even blame women for wanting to interrupt their miserable existence with an orgasm or buying some trinket that will give them a moments happiness. They do not know any better. Half the incels resenting them for it would be doing the same thing if they had the same options.

do you think in the close future (like 10 years from now) prostitution will finally be legalized and de-stigmatized?

like imagine dad gifting 1 day with an escort to his 18yo son, the simp/incel problem would be instantly fixed

female vagina is not a commodity that seeks dollars
female vagina is a commodity that seeks 10/10 facial aesthetic male sperm

your entire premise is wrong op

Anyone wanna make gay porn together?

How is the premise wrong? Sex used to only be a packaged commodity for prostitutes in the past. Sexual relationships at one point was hidden behind lock and key - only getting to know a woman and marrying her would allow you to get the treasure.

The female vagina is not seeking dollars, those that control it seek dollars. Women (or i posit SOMEONE) has changed the rules such that this once scarce commodity is now freely available and is cheaper than ever. Why would they cheapen something that used to be so precious and scarce? Pussy was once gold and now is copper.

>Was it women's idea to commoditize and package their main asset (sex) for sale? Seems kind of stupid
Why? Say you have an in-demand asset (your body), and you can exchange this asset (sex) for other forms of value (money, attention) that interest you, and still keep your asset (you can have sex more than once). Why wouldn't you? In fact, I would argue the opposite - that it would be stupid not to.

>Today it's the exact opposite situation - an equal or declining demand for sex
What are you basing this claim on? I'm seeing a higher demand for sex than ever before - such that people are paying out massive amounts just for pictures of people engaging in sex (onlyfans).

>How will this end for women
Perfectly fine. Clearly there is little interest (except by incels) of putting a stop to this voluntary exchange.

> and society in general?
Also fine. Sounds like are under the mistaken assumption that hasn't happened in society in the past, and we still have a society.

Attached: 1582747822199.jpg (890x1329, 206.51K)

All I know is that a good VN plus the right toys are almost as good as a woman already. I can fuck teen girls after saving the world and they always love me and we always cum at the same time. When VR gets good women are screwed.

>right toys
elaborate

>1900
>woman forced to marry ugly man because he is hardworking, stable and can provide for a family
>2020
>woman gets money from state so she can fuck 10/10 face chads without having to worry about commitment or financial stability
the pussy got exactly what it wanted

Attached: D8AE42CF-1332-48B7-ABC8-FCF4D02A4426.jpg (2155x3000, 1014.96K)

I think it should. There is already a decriminalization process for drugs, I don't see why sex shouldn't be next. It should have been first to be honest.

Look, women do the best they can to keep the value of pussy high. This is why their hivemind "sisterhood" shames women for being "too easy", or for not being insufferable feminists like the rest.

but the fact is they have this hunk of flesh that can generate infinite value for them sitting between their legs, so its difficult for them to individually resist breaking rank.

in a world where everything is commodified and where promiscuity is encouraged, its no surprise that this behavior occurs. motherhood and family has been denigrated and all status seems to derive from material possession, and female "empowerment" is held up as an objective good. so why wouldn't they prostitute themselves when everything around them encourages and rewards it?

Prostitution is never going to be legalised. OnlyFans, Tinder, pornography, etc. flourish because men have become overexposed to sexual impulses and are habitually sexually frustrated in modern society. It's the sugar of the mind, they load us up with it so that we continue to consoom it.
Prostitution, ironically, gives men back some of that power back by being able to choose when they feel sexual release. It's still not great (the only true solution is long-term relationships by two people who love each other) but it dampens the endless sexual hunger. That's why it'll never be legalised, and the women that are employed by it will always be viewed as traitors by other women.

prostitution is legal in lots of cunts
germany, straya and netherlands to name a few

This.

Quite the opposite. You don’t understand female hypergamy. Majority of women are attracted to the top 20% of men. Pussy may be copper as you put it for chads but the other 80% of men are struggling for scraps. This is creating a situation where more and more men are becoming incels and/or beta cucks as well as higher rates of single motherhood.

yeah, but it's still universally considered to be a thing for losers who can't get laid

mostly in America. I believe in Europe its considered a lot more normal.

>but it's still universally considered to be a thing for losers who can't get laid
>meanwhile onlyfans
times changed, buddy

you worry about that, I will be busy getting my dick sucked

Yeah man. It’s easy. It’s great. It’ll happen everywhere else soon

cope, it's a fact. chads don't pay for pussy

It seems to me soon the Uniswap will meet real competitors on the DeFi market. It seems to me, the Dymmax (dymmax.com) has all odds to rise even higher tothemoon. What do you think?

Attached: D10 (3).jpg (1312x1620, 287.82K)

this paid memes are so fucking bad, like i pity those who actually pay the pajeets

pedophiles in this thread

>people who get stuff for free don't pay for it

good insight

So you’re saying in the future all women will be prostitutes and everything is gonna be fine with that. Also there are more and more incels every time, you say only them care about this, well when they’re 50% of the male population it will be significant.

This

Nah

What does this mean for ugly women?

your sjw fake feminism is showing. go back