Be greedy when others are fearful
Other urls found in this thread:
twitter.com
twitter.com
>warren buffet
but others are greedy right now
this
Also meh, projects come and go. And I'd rather have just BTC. Or another well-performing alt that performs well with a strong anti-correlation to BTC swings.
Like LINK.
sv is already sinking bch is sure to follow hey are really the same project
not with BCH most undervalued in top 10 right now
Grayscale, a trillion dolllar fund. they buy BTC BCH and a few others. They do NOT buy BSV.
Paypal. they list BTC BCH ETH and LTC. they do NOT list BSV.
if you look at market reach. BCH is a lot more penetrated and has more entry and exit points.
if you look at tech advancement then BCH has gone through great developments. A lot of projects are being build on and around it (memo.cash for example, twitter on BCH)
low fees means it can be used as a currency for those in need in failing countries. A venezuelan person isn't going to pay the big fees to send around bitcoin core. it can go up to a months worth of wage for some of the poorest. they use BCH or others.
if you have noticed. BCH is in the top 10 and it will stay there. 3000tx sec was reached on testnet and are in the pipe. with great many new compression and improvement techniques.
BTC with 1 mb blocks will unironically stay crippled.
Do you think large exchanges suspending margin trading will be bullish for bch? I can only imagine them doing this out of concern for high fees.
Binance has brought back 75x margin cross on BCH though. either way Bitcoin core having only 1mb blocks will forever be bullish for BCH. At one point I will convert all my BTC to alts. and a big part will be for BCH cause I actually use it. you know. I don't use BTC. High fees, no zero conf. the fear of it getting stuck in critical times (in 2017 some people had to wait weeks before their btc was deposited on an exchange.) ...
>BCH is a lot more penetrated
who cares? both bch and sv only ever make sense if btc somehow magically fails and at that point the world realizes it absolutely needs bitcoin.
fat chance of that.
I thought there was going to be another fork of BCH?
it failed miserably
>who cares? both bch and sv only ever make sense if btc somehow magically fails and at that point the world realizes it absolutely needs bitcoin.
poor people that have bad national currencies that keep them the poorest care about transacting cheaply. (hint theres many more poor people than rich)
>> BTC magically fails.
if already has. cause i don't use it. I buy it hold it until "number go up" and that's it. it isn't a currency. it doesn't flow. and this will eventually catch up to it. its value will diminish against other crypto who are usable. at one point BTC had 95pct of the market cap of cryptocurrencies. this has steadily fallen since 1MB blocks keeps it unusable for the majority of the world.
Look at how mental this is. BCHABC is finished
>twitter.com
BCH is the only Bitcoin that has constantly people trying to fork. Weird how devs dont even care about BTC anymore
a fork is free speech in action. a certain group wanted to implement tax build in to the protocol. they hve forked of but their coin is essentially worthless and no one really lists it. it will go the path of bitcoin gold or diamond.
>poor people
will have access to billions of shitcoins also facebook libra and other stable coins they have absolutely zero need for bitcoin.
Wanna know your opinion about crypto incubator duckdao.io
Has anyone following it in it? What do you think about their Duck Card game with investment tools?
bch is not in any way bitcoin. it inherited all the burden but none of the benefits from the protocol. way to go full retard.
lmao go hold dollars then. idiot
frankly it surprised me... but what's more surprising is even tho the abc network secured non of the hash the node count is almost equal to bchn.
which means to me nobody fucking running bch nodes besides the 100 devs and the exchanges and miners. nobody.
I didn't say it's THE Bitcoin, learn reading comprehension
It is the only Bitcoin that has been in the spotlight of every fork though. It was there for BCH/BTC, it was there for BCH/BSV, it was now there for BCH/BCHA
i'm all in on bitcoin you know the real one that's doing +360% on average annually
still you are insinuating it's sort of bitcoin it's not. bitcoin is all about the consensus and bch broke it deliberately and clearly. it's an alt that sucks ass.
I can make an ETH token and name it Bitcoin Shitcoin (BSC) and then call it as a Bitcoin in Zig Forums. wtf are you trying to say
Getting triggered over naming conventions? This is literally some leftist bullshit.
you could but you would be a lying jeet
Meh, I'll probably start mining for BCH then, but I'm not going to dump more cash into it just because it shares the same name
mining...
uh, have an algo that switches automatically between BCH/BSV/BTC for whichever is most profitable that day. Absolutely no need to choose a coin if you are mining
also lol at the leftist argument bitcoin is a brand that deserves protection from scammers and frauds who try to bank on it's name recognition to promote their shitcoins. and i'm not saying legally fuck legislation altogether i'm saying in the public domain conversation like we are having here.
i will state it a billion times if i have to bcash has less to do with the original bitcoin than fucking litecoin. and sv is a fork of bcash twice removed shitfork of a shitfork.
could have been different... unlimited could have secured majority hash and the greater consensus. i was a very vocal advocate for increasing block size because i knew the second layer scaling will be a longer process.
but later i regretted this support with the rise of the parasitic chains spamming bitcoin block space with garbage.
sage this shit u fags
Your comments are starting to get a bit incomprehensible. Take some deep breaths.
i have been doing 12 hours of work a day for more than a week now, so could be, but i think you are full of shit just ran out of arguments.
What's your angle?