I know this shit is the next link but can't it moon faster, or at least break its previous ath...

I know this shit is the next link but can't it moon faster, or at least break its previous ath? I've been holding this shit for 3 months and I barely made a profit so far.
We have a working product with a real usecase, a growing adoption, we are shilled by Vitalik himself, and this piece of shit won't moon while literal pajeet rugpull moon before our eyes.
It's not fair bros

Attached: 1597646761036.jpg (701x424, 225.88K)

The team is all tech and very little marketing, therefore its gunna be stable growth over many years rather than short pump and dumps. This is the way

our iron hands will rewarded, all it takes is another case to reach popularity

Just keep accumulating user. When it moons you're going to be kicking yourself for not buying more anyway.

What do you mean?

Suicide stack?

50k

That really doesn't make sense when you're talking about PNK, or LINK for that matter. The make it stack for PNK should be tied in some way to staking it on cases, ie, how many you need to utterly dominate some obscure court in 2030 such that your vote decides which side wins or loses and you never lose your PNK to voting wrong on a case. LINK should be tied to the amount necessary to operate your own node/oracle 100%.

For both tokens you should just be accumulating as much as you can every time you get paid.

>implying any user on biz has the knowledge to be a juror on cases that have good returns
>implying any user on biz is going to get the opportunity to be a juror on cases that he is knowledgeable about i.e nothing
i feel sorry for you guys

I have experience as a JAP-ENG translator, I think there's a court for that.

how many people on biz do you think learned to speak gook? probably more than any other language, you're going to be staking your tokens to get onto cases that everyone else is trying to get into, while the actual smart people make money

I'm planning to be a juror on the french-eng translation court

Attached: images.jpg (631x486, 35.02K)

Even Zig Forums has very very few posters good enough to translate. I'm expecting the court to be short on jurors until PNK has widespread adoption, at least in internet communities, at which point it'll be flooded with tons of weebs and people who took one year back in college or high school. Then after a year or two of that I expect smart contracts to take off for translation groups to replace patreon/subscribestar once the copyright holders realize that they can go after TL groups' funding, not just where the material gets posted.

10k

This is the way

The fact that you can “dominate” court cases should show you the product is flawed

It's actually false, it's built in that the same adresses won't be picked if they are picked too often. Besides, if you vote against other jurors, you lose credibility (probability to be picked again) and pnk, there's no incentive to do it.

By the way, the jurors are anonymous, good luck bribing someone on your eBay dispute if you don't even know who the jurors are.

kleros is good kleros is great i surrender my will as of this date

This is the way

What is a good system for you? And what can make the token price growing? Seems like I should tell you smth about RBC

> ROI has reached more than 400% for a month


The team will add the instant trades services very soon, so I advise you to use before the huge pump!

Tfw only up 161% this month

>next
>link
kek
>Be edgy internet troll
>run around dozens of communities telling them pnk is the next LINK
>dozens upon dozens of get rich quick jeets fall for it
>dump it

>3months complaining
I’ve been holding since February, who cares. Buy accumulate and hodl. If you sell this for less than $1 you’re unironically mentally handicapped

Attached: 9B67FF4F-4686-45D0-84C1-DF9239576C92.png (750x1334, 532.95K)

Did they already implement that? From reading the book my understanding is that it's possible for more than one of your pinakion to get selected at random for the same court case and you wind up with multiple votes. They handwaved it away but it's theoretically possible for a whale to stake some ridiculous amount of PNK in a shallow court and wind up getting multiple votes. With three jurors picked, if you get two votes, you are the majority. With 7 jurors, if you get 2 or 3 votes, basically whichever side you go with is vastly more likely to win even if you pick at random. Of course, you're still incentivized to vote honestly, but even so you're still maximizing your odds of voting "correctly" and accumulating jurors fees (because now for the effort of judging one case, you're getting paid 2 or 3 times the juror fees).

Attached: 20201204_174634.jpg (720x1031, 148.29K)

I bought a few million PNK earlier on. I didn’t really believe in this product until a few weeks ago. I got cycled as a juror once a few months ago, but lately I’m getting calls here once a week to sit on some cases. I actually really like it a lot, it’s like fiver of the courts. But we get some good cases

It's 250k you stupid, late poorfags.

Attached: 1596118263588.jpg (546x639, 51.59K)

This is the way.

All their products so far have been laughably useless. They are trying to demonstrate functions way too early, and the only thing holding them back is the lack of interest in DeFi. Curate is arguably useful at this point but Linguo should have been released a year from now.

The real takeoff is going to be when they take over small claims for a small real world jurisdiction. But there's also going to be a huge takeoff when it starts getting incorporated into real world ADR and arbitration agreements. There only thing holding the project back is the inability to screen jurors by what judicial system they're a citizen of. If there was a way to restrict jurors to individual states or regions (like a county in the US), it could basically wipe out the backlogs of most justice systems, all you need at that point is a judge to rubber stamp the rulings once they're made and make them state official.

>If there was a way to restrict jurors to individual states or regions (like a county in the US), it could basically wipe out the backlogs of most justice systems, all you need at that point is a judge to rubber stamp the rulings once they're made and make them state official.
I'm not an (American) lawyer, is that needed in USA? Where I live parties to a dispute can simply agree to use arbitration, and the method of arbitration is also something they can decide upon by consent. If they really wanted they could agree to settle by coin toss. Is there some law in USA that prevents the parties from deciding the kind of ADR that will be used to settle disputes?

they admit that fringe cases like you described will happen, but that is also why there is an appeal process