This kills the Linktard

You did sell, right?

Attached: 634643463464.png (631x645, 789.56K)

its solving itself by crashing the price

the pic they used is trippy af

Wawa wewa

about the price of a cup of coffee

That's what real security costs. But that's okay, docusign is only going to get fucked as soon as someone starts fraudulently signing shit using their technology and they're found at fault. Meanwhile secure private keys and PGP signatures have been around forever and they're free, but that's okay, docusign has a pretty website! Fuck em.

the ants in the maze are us

>not using zoracles

>T sigs and arbitrum

Good thing off-chain reporting solves this

>unicorns and fairy dust

Now *this* is copeposting

Attached: 2535235235233.png (171x242, 115.82K)

That has never happened and never will

Blame gas costs. It will change once Arbitrum is live later this month.

Yeah blockchain tech...not middleware.....I see what you faggots did there. LINK 10000 cope more.

Retards on here actually believed people would pay a fat Russian $50 to ask him the weather instead of using google. Lmao.

This desu

This is bullish!

All it takes is one disgruntled employee or one very clever hacker. APTs are a thing.

this isn't a trans friendly board faggot

This just keeps getting funner! Anyway, hope you only invested what you could afford to lose.

Attached: 6346346436.png (489x442, 308.18K)

hackers aren't a thing prove me wrong

Attached: 1585523932870.png (1000x536, 758.86K)

Yes, and reading the newspaper via the internet was prohibitively expensive in 1992.

>trippy af

Don’t write like a zoomer nigger

Kek the problem isn't blockchain, it's LINK! It's a shitcoin. There are, at a minimum, 4 oracle projects that are better. But congrats to Sergey for showing us how not to do it. Pictured: the Chainlink of automobiles.

Attached: 656445645646.jpg (1000x667, 112.97K)

Naturally you won’t name them.

Isn't he talking about using a blockchain based infrastructure for the services DocuSign offers? That is, he's comparing DocuSign's centralized provenance model with doing the same thing on a decentralized ledger, which would certainly be much more expensive and also not be needed if we trust DocuSign with maintaining the ledger.
That is a totally different thing from providing access to their ledger via Chainlink oracles. While posters who think anything that exists on the blockchain won't need Chainlink Oracles are missing the entire game theoretical aspect of Chainlink, this news could nevertheless be seen as slightly in favor of Chainlink, as it seems DocuSign aren't in a hurry to put their data on a publicly accessible blockchain (so even those smart contract developers who don't understand link will not have the choice to forgo an Oracle and query the blockchain directly).

>gas costs are too high
Yes, we've been over this. It's being solved. Try to keep up OP

If you knew the first thing about chainlink you would know that this is not true. Like it fundamentally is not true and makes no sense. So anything the retard says doesn't matter

Bullish for XRP because no PoW