Ok Kleros-heads

uniswap sir

>www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_WP_Dispute_Resolution_for_Blockchain_2020.pdf
oh, maybe (probably?)
the video upload date is today but I guess it was probably live earlier
thanks user

Attached: 1607537621664.jpg (250x250, 32.45K)

>they're either about to kingmake or btfo kleros
>Juries vs. game theory: Many of the blockchain-based dispute resolution mechanisms that have been
proposed involve jurors deciding, not based on the merits of each party’s position but based on a prediction
of how other jurors will vote.19 While this may be acceptable for anonymized disputes in low-risk situations, it is
unlikely to be adopted by enterprise users because of the inherent uncertainties in a dispute resolution process
that could be based on matters other than the merits of a case.
sirs we are btfo sell it all quickly my god we are not going to make it

With Kleros, the jurors do consider the merits of each party's position though. The game theory part isn't the only reason it works.

Attached: 1607624914419.jpg (1671x1061, 529.67K)

youtube.com/watch?v=unRldLdllZ8

Goodbye sirs

on first glance they don't really btfo or kingmake (although it is good that kleros/aragon are mentioned)
this just seems to be mapping the problem rather than offering the solution

It's probably just going to be integrating chainlink powered oracles with the existing legal system, not like Kleros at all. What she's describing is (if I understand correctly):
Dispute -> Gov't Justice System -> Oracle -> Blockchain

Whereas Kleros is entirely different:
Smart Contract w/Kleros clause -> Dispute -> Kleros Court Decision -> Smart Contract -> Execution based on Kleros Court Decision

They have entirely different markets, in my opinion. However, Kleros does have huge growth potential to take over the IRL arbitration market which is as simple as generating a template smart contract that complies with existing arbitration law, but has both parties agree that Kleros court will act as the arbiter and make the final call. Taking over small claims court would be a little harder and require IRL courts to adapt to Kleros and agree to enforce Kleros decisions, but they might be willing to do so to efficiently deal with backlogged cases in certain jurisdictions.

Attached: 1601935433720.png (708x502, 149.14K)

HOLY FUCK, user I WAS LISTENING TO THIS TOO

When i heard "contract dispute resolution" i shot up. We are all going to make it

Attached: 1599518475181.jpg (500x617, 71.5K)

Yeah. Though I'd say it's positive for blockchain-based dispute resolution that they're discussing it and taking it seriously.

Attached: federico.png (484x223, 43.74K)

Attached: resolution.png (1013x466, 57.58K)

>http
Checked, basically we are going to make it ?

Attached: 652.jpg (250x250, 13.71K)

gooodbyeeee
life is shorrrtt

Nevermind, just saw the paper was posted and skimmed it. They cited the Kleros short paper but clearly didn't understand why it works, probably because they didn't understand what Schelling points are and how they apply to the game theory or history of random jury selection from Ancient Athens. Such unfounded claims will be resolved in time as Kleros gains a track record for fair decisions the same way Bitcoin fudders stopped claiming it was insecure after years of no hacks.

click the link user its safe, the world economic forum cites the kleros white paper in their paper

ahhhh I got hacked by Schwab and he took all my linkies

Who's the lady in the top right corner talking about the paper?

Attached: resootality.jpg (1133x706, 202.47K)

try starting the video from the beginning
she's one of the authors from the wef/chainlink whitepaper

> While this may be acceptable for anonymized disputes in low-risk situations, it is
unlikely to be adopted by enterprise users because of the inherent uncertainties in a dispute resolution process
that could be based on matters other than the merits of a case.
Sirs I think they're dabbing on us

Attached: 1607472593220.png (960x640, 225.72K)